Manning Headed to Denver

[Blick]

I do think the Denver defense is a good defense, and will benefit from the same type of TOP they benefited under with Tebow, because Manning has proved to be the best in the business at masking soft defenses by extending drives, something he did for a decade in Indy.

This is confusing. You think Denver is a good defense, and believe they will benefit from the same type of TOP that they had with Tebow...when they were the 20th ranked defense. Then, you talk about Manning's ability to mask soft defenses. So is Denver's defense soft or good?

Your best skill players not named Bowe are all coming back from injuries that were catastrophic and it's only an assumption at this point to say they will be 100% of what they were before the injuries.

I's only an assumption that they won't be back 100% as well. It's 2012, glen. Let's not act like KC's guys are all going to be like Robert Edwards.

[Blick]

Moeaki, Charles and Berry will all be coming back from torn ACLs... It's pretty widely known that the ACL is a two-year recovery process.

If all three come back and are the same exact guys they were in 2010 then I'm going to change my primary physician to whomever is the Chiefs head trainer because that guy is a freaking miracle worker.

It's more like one year, especially for the level of athlete we're talking about here. It also helps that they're all young.

I don't know who takes 2 years to recover from an ACL anymore.

[Warner2BruceTD]

This is confusing. You think Denver is a good defense, and believe they will benefit from the same type of TOP that they had with Tebow...when they were the 20th ranked defense. Then, you talk about Manning's ability to mask soft defenses. So is Denver's defense soft or good?

I watched the games, I don't care about rank.

The Denver defense was a mess under Orton. Look at the turnover rates and time of possession differences under Tebow.

The Denver defense played very well once Tebow took over, because he protected the ball and kept them off the field. This is a similar formula that Manning has used for years in Indy, extending drives and eating up clock to help his undersized, built to rush the passer defenses.

[Blick]

I watched the games, I don't care about rank.

The Denver defense was a mess under Orton. Look at the turnover rates and time of possession differences under Tebow.

The Denver defense played very well once Tebow took over, because he protected the ball and kept them off the field. This is a similar formula that Manning has used for years in Indy, extending drives and eating up clock to help his undersized, built to rush the passer defenses.

To me, that isn't a sign of a good defense.

"They're a good defense, but they need the offense to hide them on the sideline."

The sign of a good defense should be playing well despite what the offense is doing...like KC did with the bums they trotted out at QB.

[FUSE]

Anytime you can extend drives and let your defense rest on the sidelines, it is a good thing. The point is Manning most likely barring some weird alternate reality won't have too many 3 and outs like Tebow or Orton, and then which will lead to Denver's defense resting more and being able to hold teams better. They did a good job in terms of points once Tebow took over with the exception of a few games(NE, Minn, Det)

You dont always have to score in 2 minutes. Its more like a marathon not a sprint. Longer drives for your offense means your defense rests and the other defense is on the field longer and could have better chances late in the game when the other defense is tired

[ralaw]

Manning got $95 million over five years? Geessh!

[ZoneBlitz]

How is it an out? I defended everything Tebow did because he was a Bronco, plain and simple...

The same way I defended Hochuli's call when Cutler clearly fumbled the ball against the Chargers and the same way I defended Brandon Marshall every time he got caught beating a woman while he was here too.

That is exactly what I'm saying.

I get enough reality in the real world. Sports fandom is my escape, and I will not let petty issues like the truth ruin what is supposed to be something fun for me.

Basically you're just homer-trolling the NFL forum.

[ralaw]

The years are a nice way to be able to pro-rate the signing bonus when he walks away after two or three without destroying our cap.

I would also assume much of that is back loaded but I can't say for certain.

I believe it is front loaded, as to get the most value while Manning is still productive. ESPN radio said $56 million would be guaranteed the first 3 years.

[LiquidLarry2GhostWF]

Denver, IMO, isn't an instant Super Bowl winner with Manning.

They really need to bring in some of Manning's teammates...those teammates just so happen to FIT with what the Broncos need.

I think Jeff Saturday is the most important. He knows Manning's calls and cadences and will be fundamental to getting that offensive line, which is young, and looking pretty good, but could use a center (JD Walton is "ok") and fits right in. I think they could use a first round pick on a player like David DeCastro to shore up the rest of the offensive line because protecting Manning should be Denver's #1 priority.

Also out there, Dallas Clark, a much needed position player at TE. Also Jacob Tamme. Daniel Fells and Virgil Green are very upgradable players. Clark and Tamme do that in an instant.

The Broncos could use depth at running back and a back like Addai could come in and be a "third" running back option in Denver behind McGahee and a rookie speed back (maybe a Lamar Miller?). Knows the blocking schemes and could be valuable in getting the rest of the backs up to par.

By signing the Colts castaways, they become more of a Super Bowl contender because they A) fill needs and B) make a seamless transition to a Manning offense.

[FUSE]

Basically you're just homer-trolling the NFL forum.

At least he is adding something to the conversation, unlike you with is just ranking and raving about trolling.

So either add something to the conversation or


Liquid
- I think they are planning on bringing in Saturday, Stokley(rather not, hes old for a wr), and Clark(would rather have Jacob Tamme, younger version of Clark). I think they could draft a rb in the 2nd rnd who could take over for mcgahee.

Didn't realize until yesterday but Fells(Pats) and Rosario(Chargers) are gone. So they will definitely need a TE, especially with Green on a 4 game suspension.

[Bear Pand]

Denver went from suck for Luck to a deep playoff run with Tebow, who as we all know is the worst QB to ever live (eye roll). Manning makes any team an instant SB contender, so this should be easy. Assuming health, they are my SB favorite in the AFC.

Not the favorite yet, I still think they'll need more help especially at RB.

Def the AFC West favorite and a playoff team.

Also out there, Dallas Clark, a much needed position player at TE. Also Jacob Tamme. Daniel Fells and Virgil Green are very upgradable players. Clark and Tamme do that in an instant.

I have no faith in Clark anymore. Older now, can't stay healthy... He's not terrible but I don't think he'd be a huge pickup for them.

[Warner2BruceTD]

Very fair contract, with the front loaded money, and the ability for Denver to void the entire deal if Manning has more neck issues.

Give Manning credit here, he could have held these teams over a barrel, but he was very fair. This is a guy who clearly has a drive to win. This wasn't about recouping lost money.

[ralaw]

Trolling would mean that I was fucking around with you guys and didn't really believe anything I was saying.

So, your entire belief system is based on the roster moves the Broncos make? I'm amazed at the ability of some fans to argue one stance to no end and totally reverse that stance based on a roster move. In a way it tells me that you never really believed anything you said about Tebow. It seems to me the truth should be the truth regardless of the jersey a player is wearing. However, the word fan does derive from the word fanatic.

[Archer]

Denver, IMO, isn't an instant Super Bowl winner with Manning.

They really need to bring in some of Manning's teammates...those teammates just so happen to FIT with what the Broncos need.

I think Jeff Saturday is the most important. He knows Manning's calls and cadences and will be fundamental to getting that offensive line, which is young, and looking pretty good, but could use a center (JD Walton is "ok") and fits right in. I think they could use a first round pick on a player like David DeCastro to shore up the rest of the offensive line because protecting Manning should be Denver's #1 priority.

Also out there, Dallas Clark, a much needed position player at TE. Also Jacob Tamme. Daniel Fells and Virgil Green are very upgradable players. Clark and Tamme do that in an instant.

The Broncos could use depth at running back and a back like Addai could come in and be a "third" running back option in Denver behind McGahee and a rookie speed back (maybe a Lamar Miller?). Knows the blocking schemes and could be valuable in getting the rest of the backs up to par.

By signing the Colts castaways, they become more of a Super Bowl contender because they A) fill needs and B) make a seamless transition to a Manning offense.

Only problem with signing Addai/Clark/Saturday is the injuries and age of the players.

Clark was getting injured in Manning's last healthy year and continued to get hurt last year and seemingly struggled to even get open when he was. (I think Tamme may be a better option if you want somebody who Manning trusts)

Addai has been picking up injuries since his rookie year. He's an underrated RB and Manning loves him but I think Denver would find it hard to trust that he'll be available for an entire season.

Saturday's performance has been dropping year in year out but at least he has managed to stay mostly healthy and Manning can trust him. I think he'd still be a decent option.

[Champ]

Isn't the center the most important position according manning menus the skill positions?

Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk