Jonathan Vilma sues Goodell for defamation

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • FirstTimer
    Freeman Error

    • Feb 2009
    • 18729

    Jonathan Vilma sues Goodell for defamation



    NEW ORLEANS -- Suspended Saints linebacker Jonathan Vilma filed a defamation lawsuit Thursday against NFL commissioner Roger Goodell.

    The suit in U.S. District Court in New Orleans claims Goodell has made false statements about Vilma while discussing the NFL's bounty investigation of the New Orleans Saints.


    Goodell has said Vilma was a leader of the team's bounty program that put up thousands of dollars for big hits on opposing teams' star players from 2009-11, including on then-Arizona quarterback Kurt Warner and then-Minnesota quarterback Brett Favre during the playoffs in 2010.

    "Commissioner Goodell opted to make very public and unfortunately erroneous allegations against Jonathan," said Vilma's attorney, Peter Ginsberg. "By making these false and public statements, he has significantly harmed Jonathan's reputation and ability to make a living.

    "By suing commissioner Goodell in court, Jonathan opted to use a fair playing field where he has procedural rights and protections to remedy the harm Commissioner Goodell has done to him," Ginsberg added.

    Vilma wrote on his Twitter account that, "As I've said before..I NEVER PAID, NOR INTENDED TO PAY ANY AMOUNT OF MONEY, TO ANY PLAYER FOR INTENTIONALLY HURTING AN OPPONENT."

    Goodell has suspended Vilma for the entire season. Vilma and three other players who received shorter suspensions -- defensive end Will Smith, defensive lineman Anthony Hargrove and linebacker Scott Fujita -- all have appealed their punishments. Hargrove now plays for Green Bay while Fujita is with Cleveland.

    "We have not yet reviewed the filing," NFL spokesman Greg Aiello said. "However, our commitment to player safety and the integrity of the game is our main consideration. We recognize that not everyone will agree with decisions that need to be made."

    Vilma's lawsuit, which is expected to be heard by Judge Ginger Berrigan, asks for unspecified monetary damages.

    The players' association has said that the league has refused to turn over what the union would view as hard evidence that Vilma or the other sanctioned players tried to intentionally injure targeted opponents or sponsored such behavior on the field.

    Ginsberg has echoed those complaints and said the federal lawsuit could force the NFL's hand.

    "It is certainly the case that in court, Jonathan will have a right to see whatever it is that commissioner Goodell has been hiding from us and what commissioner Goodell contends gave him a basis to make these false allegations," Ginsberg said. "We will have a fair and neutral judge to preside over the dispute rather than contending with the executioner also being the person making the final decision."

    Just when I thought the Saints couldn't turn this into MORE of a clown show.............
  • Tailback U
    No substitute 4 strength.
    • Nov 2008
    • 10282

    #2
    Good for Vilma, if he actually is innocent. If not then this shouldn't last long and he is a complete moron. Show the evidence and let everyone move on from on this.

    Comment

    • KNUBB
      WHITE RONDO
      • Jun 2009
      • 7973

      #3
      The evidence is definitely coming out since this is now in the federal courts.


      Comment

      • Houston
        Back home
        • Oct 2008
        • 21231

        #4
        Go ahead, still not playing next year

        Comment

        • st lickem
          smut peddler
          • Apr 2012
          • 168

          #5
          now the facts will come out. If he's guilty throw the book at him. If he's not, let him play.
          sigpic

          Comment

          • RosettaStoned
            Throbbing Tebowner
            • Oct 2008
            • 9951

            #6
            Lmao @ Saints fans now saying the facts will come out.... Worst fans. Scummiest team.
            So, metaphorically speaking, our physiology basically has the universe mapped out and you're thinking it needs to be taught addition & subtraction.

            -Alan Aragon

            Comment

            • st lickem
              smut peddler
              • Apr 2012
              • 168

              #7
              yes, I want to see actual facts. I want to see the evidence. Lets see how it plays out.
              sigpic

              Comment

              • ryne candy
                Aggie C/O '01
                • Feb 2009
                • 4355

                #8
                Thrown out by judge....didn't agree with Goodell but no wrongdoing occurred (in terms of defamation).

                New Orleans Saints linebacker Jonathan Vilma's defamation lawsuit against NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell in connection with the bounty case was dismissed by a federal judge on Thursday.

                U.S. District Judge Ginger Berrigan in New Orleans ruled in favor of Goodell's motion to dismiss Vilma's complaint, which was filed in May and set out 11 claims. Vilma had argued that Goodell made false statements, tarnishing the player's reputation, in connection with the league's investigation of what it determined was a system that offered cash bonuses to Saints players for big hits from 2009-11.

                ''Even though this matter has been pending only since May ... it feels as protracted and painful as the Saints season itself, and calls for closure,'' Berrigan wrote in her decision. ''The Court nonetheless believes that had this matter been handled in a less heavy handed way, with greater fairness toward the players and the pressures they face, this litigation and the related cases would not have been necessary.''

                Goodell initially suspended Vilma for all of the 2012 season - although he wound up being able to play while appealing - and three other players received shorter bans: Saints defensive end Will Smith and two former Saints, Cleveland linebacker Scott Fujita and free agent defensive lineman Anthony Hargrove. But Paul Tagliabue, Goodell's predecessor as commissioner, heard a final round of player appeals and threw out the suspensions last month.

                NFL spokesman Greg Aiello said neither he nor Goodell would have any comment Thursday about Berrigan's ruling.

                Peter Ginsberg, a lawyer for Vilma, wrote in an email: ''We are obviously disappointed, strongly believe that the CBA does not give anyone - including a commissioner - a license to misrepresent and to manufacture facts, especially at the expense of another person's reputation - and are considering our options.''

                Berrigan wrote that ''Vilma maintains that Goodell is responsible for the allegedly offending statements in his individual capacity.'' The judge rejected that as ''unpersuasive,'' saying: ''The Court finds that all of the allegedly offensive statements were made by Goodell as Commissioner of the NFL in conjunction with the investigation resulting in the now well-known discipline against Vilma and others associated with the Saints.''

                Vilma's lawsuit pointed to six statements made by Goodell - including in NFL news releases, memos to the league's 32 teams, and an interview with the NFL Network.

                ''While the Court is extremely disturbed by the fundamental lack of due process in Goodell's denying the players the identities of and the right to confront their accusers, that was substantially rectified later in the process,'' Berrigan wrote. ''So while the process was initially procedurally flawed, the statements were ultimately found to have enough support to defeat the defamation claims.''

                Comment

                Working...