If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If you are having trouble accessing your account and don't remember your password, email help@virtualsportsnetwork.com and i'll get you an updated password for 2024.
I still maintain Duece should have thrown it forward, out of bounds, for an incomplete pass. Would have possibly resulted in an ineligible man downfield penalty (or intentional grounding obviously) but there was a chance at taking less of a yardage hit.
I still maintain Duece should have thrown it forward, out of bounds, for an incomplete pass. Would have possibly resulted in an ineligible man downfield penalty (or intentional grounding obviously) but there was a chance at taking less of a yardage hit.
I still maintain Duece should have thrown it forward, out of bounds, for an incomplete pass. Would have possibly resulted in an ineligible man downfield penalty (or intentional grounding obviously) but there was a chance at taking less of a yardage hit.
He would have had to thrown it past the line of scrimmage for it not to have been an intentional grounding penalty. And the intentional grounding penalty would have been a "spot of the foul" penalty with loss of down, so McCallister wouldn't have been saving any yardage.
He would have had to thrown it past the line of scrimmage for it not to have been an intentional grounding penalty. And the intentional grounding penalty would have been a "spot of the foul" penalty with loss of down, so McCallister wouldn't have been saving any yardage.
Yeah, I just think it was worth a shot rather than just giving up the yardage. Let's say there is a 10% chance of Duece throwing it far enough, if he does, that's a 26 yard swing. If he doesn't it's the same loss of yardage. The ultimate "nothing to lose" proposition.
Yeah, I just think it was worth a shot rather than just giving up the yardage. Let's say there is a 10% chance of Duece throwing it far enough, if he does, that's a 26 yard swing. If he doesn't it's the same loss of yardage. The ultimate "nothing to lose" proposition.
Still a decent chance it will be intentional grounding if there is no receiver in the area. And there is a possibility of an INT. McCallister should have done a quick kick and punted the ball 50 yards downfield.
Still a decent chance it will be intentional grounding if there is no receiver in the area. And there is a possibility of an INT. McCallister should have done a quick kick and punted the ball 50 yards downfield.
Eh, at that point might as well dropkick and go for the points.
Still a decent chance it will be intentional grounding if there is no receiver in the area. And there is a possibility of an INT. McCallister should have done a quick kick and punted the ball 50 yards downfield.
Lets say a ball carrier loses control of the ball behind the line of scrimmage, and accidentally kicks it forward with his calf.
Tweet
Comment