What did we learn about the Bears from the Detroit game?
Collapse
X
-
My argument:
The Lions saved themselves from just another disappointing year, like this year, by starting hot early and a crazy amount of important injuries to the Bears. One game does not disprove that. Either you admit the Vikings and Titans are obviously better this year(which they are not), or your argument is garbage(which it is).
Jahvid Best clearly deserved MVP last year since he was so important like you've stated. The Lions have been one of the worst teams in the league since their first loss and continue to show it this year. The Lions had the better streak, and the Bears were the better team.
No idea why I'm arguing with you though...everyone knows that goes no where with your ego and bias.Comment
-
Originally posted by terrible argumentand a crazy amount of important injuries to the Bears.
Originally posted by garbage argument is garbageEither you admit the Vikings and Titans are obviously better this year(which they are not), or your argument is garbage(which it is).
Originally posted by heatandpackersare#1!Jahvid Best clearly deserved MVP last year since he was so important like you've stated.
The Lions have been one of the worst teams in the league since their first loss and continue to show it this year.
The 2011 NFL season stats per game for Jahvid Best of the Detroit Lions on ESPN. Includes full stats, per opponent, for regular and postseason.
Originally posted by derpThe Lions had the better streak, and the Bears were the better team.
No idea why I'm arguing with you though...everyone knows that goes no where with your ego and bias.
Originally posted by Vince LobotomyOh and BTW, I would absolutely love to say the Lions were the better team but it's just simply untrue. The Bears are worth hating as a legit rival, while the Lions haven't been good enough in my lifetime to even give a fuck about.Comment
-
arguing for this lions team. Smith, Bell, and Leshoure when he's played have been decent enough in the running game this year to make up for Best being out. Bests ONLY good rushing game was against the Bears, so using his absence as a reason for the Lions being a bad team doesn't make any sense. He was more of a receiving threat out of the backfield than anything else. He never had more than 80 yards rushing in any other game ever.
The fact is teams figured out if you take away Staffords ability to chuck it up to CJ then he's a mediocre QB at best. The Lions can't run, don't throw very well, don't stop the run, and only stop the pass if they get a pass rush. They aren't a good team and only made the playoffs last year because BOTH of the star players on the bears offense missed the end of last season.Comment
-
Nice counter argument. There is no argument that says that without a running back that can break a big run, the passing game isn't as dangerous. It's evident in the fact that he played 6 games last year and they haven't been the same since. If you would've understood that the first time, I wouldn't have had to waste my time. And Saluki, Primetime hates homers, so knock it off. ;)Comment
-
Nice counter argument. There is no argument that says that without a running back that can break a big run, the passing game isn't as dangerous. It's evident in the fact that he played 6 games last year and they haven't been the same since. If you would've understood that the first time, I wouldn't have had to waste my time. And Saluki, Primetime hates homers, so knock it off. ;)
Sent from my HTC myTouch 4g using Tapatalk 2Comment
-
Comment
Comment