Blind BCS Poll

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jayrock
    mini MJ
    • Apr 2012
    • 1828

    Originally posted by JeremyHight
    People hate Notre Dame because of you.
    This isn't about ND. It's about the overrated SEC.

    Read also: I don't give a shit

    Comment

    • Primetime
      Thank You Prince
      • Nov 2008
      • 17526

      Jayrock provides a good argument in this thread. This gun' be good.

      Comment

      • NAHSTE
        Probably owns the site
        • Feb 2009
        • 22233

        Originally posted by Jayrock
        You're wrong. The entire SEC is laughably overrated this year.
        Originally posted by Jayrock
        This isn't about what conference is best... because obviously the SEC is. That doesn't change the fact that Georgia, Florida, USCe, aTm, and Miss State are horrendously overrated. This is about why teams like Clemson, Fl St., USCe, etc. aren't ranked above them.
        Originally posted by Jayrock

        I think Fl St. will beat Florida. There is no doubt in my mind Clemson will beat South Carolina.
        Originally posted by Jayrock
        My point is the entire SEC is overrated. I'm not denying A&M is a legit team, but the entire conference bias is incredible. These teams don't play anyone, they beat each other, but stay ranked in the top 9. It's unreal. Nobody was talking about A&M other than you until today. Suddenly they are a top 10 team?
        Sup.

        Comment

        • Jayrock
          mini MJ
          • Apr 2012
          • 1828

          Originally posted by NAHSTE
          Sup.
          Fair enough, they got the Ws. I thought Clemson would beat USCe, but they pooped the bed. Florida needed a cheap shot on EJ Manuel before they could run away with the win. FL St. was not the same after that shot and had all momentum before it.

          It still doesn't explain why the SEC should have been ranked higher at those points during the season.

          Comment

          • NAHSTE
            Probably owns the site
            • Feb 2009
            • 22233

            Originally posted by Jayrock
            It still doesn't explain why the SEC should have been ranked higher at those points during the season.


            THEY ARE RANKED HIGHER BECAUSE THEY ARE KNOWN TO BE BETTER TEAMS

            Comment

            • Warner2BruceTD
              2011 Poster Of The Year
              • Mar 2009
              • 26142

              Teams that I have little doubt are better than ND and would beat them pretty easily in a championship game on a neutral field:

              Alabama
              LSU
              Texas A&M
              Georgia
              Florida
              Florida St
              USC w/Barkley
              Oregon
              Kansas St
              South Carolina
              Ohio St


              Teams I think are not significantly better, or in some cases worse, than ND and certainly could beat them on a neutral field:

              UCLA
              Oklahoma
              Penn St
              Stanford
              Oklahoma St
              West Virginia
              Baylor
              Oregon St
              Pitt
              Rutgers
              Louisville
              Wisconsin
              Nebraska
              Texas
              Boise St
              Clemson
              TCU
              BYU

              Now, you may want to gripe about a team or two on one or both of these lists. That's fine, i'm not interested in breaking down Oklahoma St vs ND. The point here, is I can't recall a weaker potential national champion. I'm not saying they don't belong in the game, because i'm a big proponent of winning the games you play and I think their schedule was good enough, so going undefeated should matter, but does anybody really think this is a great team?

              Comment

              • Jayrock
                mini MJ
                • Apr 2012
                • 1828

                Originally posted by Warner2BruceTD
                Teams that I have little doubt are better than ND and would beat them pretty easily in a championship game on a neutral field:

                Alabama
                LSU
                Texas A&M
                Georgia
                Florida
                Florida St
                USC w/Barkley
                Oregon
                Kansas St
                South Carolina
                Ohio St


                Teams I think are not significantly better, or in some cases worse, than ND and certainly could beat them on a neutral field:

                UCLA
                Oklahoma
                Penn St
                Stanford
                Oklahoma St
                West Virginia
                Baylor
                Oregon St
                Pitt
                Rutgers
                Louisville
                Wisconsin
                Nebraska
                Texas
                Boise St
                Clemson
                TCU
                BYU

                Now, you may want to gripe about a team or two on one or both of these lists. That's fine, i'm not interested in breaking down Oklahoma St vs ND. The point here, is I can't recall a weaker potential national champion. I'm not saying they don't belong in the game, because i'm a big proponent of winning the games you play and I think their schedule was good enough, so going undefeated should matter, but does anybody really think this is a great team?
                ND 30 Alabama 13

                Count it.

                Comment

                • Saluki
                  Ball So Hard
                  • Oct 2008
                  • 9445

                  Originally posted by Jayrock
                  ND 30 Alabama 13

                  Count it.
                  I like this matchup for ND, but no way they put up 30 maybe more like 20-13

                  Sent from my HTC myTouch 4g using Tapatalk 2

                  Comment

                  • FirstTimer
                    Freeman Error

                    • Feb 2009
                    • 18729

                    Originally posted by Warner2BruceTD
                    Teams that I have little doubt are better than ND and would beat them pretty easily in a championship game on a neutral field:

                    Alabama
                    LSU
                    Texas A&M
                    Georgia
                    Florida
                    Florida St
                    USC w/Barkley
                    Oregon
                    Kansas St
                    South Carolina
                    Ohio St


                    Teams I think are not significantly better, or in some cases worse, than ND and certainly could beat them on a neutral field:

                    UCLA
                    Oklahoma
                    Penn St
                    Stanford
                    Oklahoma St
                    West Virginia
                    Baylor
                    Oregon St
                    Pitt
                    Rutgers
                    Louisville
                    Wisconsin
                    Nebraska
                    Texas
                    Boise St
                    Clemson
                    TCU
                    BYU

                    Now, you may want to gripe about a team or two on one or both of these lists. That's fine, i'm not interested in breaking down Oklahoma St vs ND. The point here, is I can't recall a weaker potential national champion. I'm not saying they don't belong in the game, because i'm a big proponent of winning the games you play and I think their schedule was good enough, so going undefeated should matter, but does anybody really think this is a great team?
                    I don't think there are any "great teams" in CFB this year to be honest.

                    Your list is overall laughable as to who would beat them easily but whatever.

                    Comment

                    • NAHSTE
                      Probably owns the site
                      • Feb 2009
                      • 22233

                      Originally posted by FirstTimer
                      Your list is overall laughable as to who would beat them easily but whatever.
                      True, forgot the DORES.

                      Comment

                      • Jayrock
                        mini MJ
                        • Apr 2012
                        • 1828

                        Give this a read



                        Let's say this up front: The Southeastern Conference has earned its towering superiority complex.
                        The smugness is based on fact, the arrogance grounded in truth. The proof is in the hardware, and six consecutive crystal footballs don't lie. It is the best college football conference in the land.

                        But occasionally arrogance leads to blindness, or at least severe myopia. And for all the SEC elitists guaranteeing a blowout by whoever wins its league against Notre Dame in the BCS championship game, I'm here to offer an eye test.

                        Look at the facts, get over the regional bias and acknowledge that someone outside of Dixie might actually be good at football.

                        My friend Clay Travis, who runs the excellent SEC blog, "Outkick the Coverage," was the voice of SEC arrogance Sunday morning on Twitter. Quoth Clay: "Notre Dame will be destroyed by either Alabama or Georgia. Seventh best team in SEC. At best."

                        Let me repeat that I'm a fan of Clay's and enjoy his work, but this is ridiculous. Notre Dame may indeed lose the national title game, but I don't foresee a blowout and an Irish victory would not be an outlandish outcome (especially if the opponent is Georgia).

                        And anyone who believes Notre Dame would be the seventh-best team in the SEC needs to get out more.

                        The gist of this argument is that the Irish could not have played anywhere near the schedule of an SEC team. Unfortunately, it's completely false. Here's the reality, stacking all 12 games on the Irish ledger alongside Alabama's and Georgia's and using the Sagarin Ratings as a measuring stick:

                        Best opponent played: Notre Dame hosted Stanford (eighth in Sagarin), Alabama hosted Texas A&M (seventh), Georgia played Florida (fourth) at a neutral site. The Irish and Bulldogs both won close games. The Crimson Tide lost at home. Most impressive of the three: Georgia.

                        Second-best opponent: Notre Dame visited Oklahoma (ninth). Alabama visited LSU (11th). Georgia visited South Carolina (10th). The Irish won by 17 points, the Tide won by four in the final minute, the Bulldogs lost by four touchdowns. Most impressive of the three: Notre Dame.

                        Third-best opponent: Notre Dame played USC (16th) on the road, never trailed and won by nine. Alabama played Michigan (20th) at a neutral site, never trailed and won by 27. Georgia hosted Vanderbilt (29th) and won by 45. Most impressive of the three: Alabama.

                        Fourth-best opponent: Notre Dame played Michigan (20th) at home and won by a touchdown. Alabama played Mississippi (33rd) on the road and won by 19. Georgia hosted Mississippi (33rd) and won by 27. All three won. Most impressive of the three: Notre Dame.

                        Fifth-best opponent: Notre Dame hosted BYU (37th) and won by three. Alabama hosted Mississippi State (36th) and won by 31. Georgia visited Missouri (43rd) and won by 21. All three won. Most impressive of the three: Alabama.

                        Sixth-best opponent: Notre Dame visited Michigan State (39th) and won by 17. Alabama visited Missouri (43rd) and won by 32. Georgia visited Tennessee (54th) and won by seven. Most impressive of the three: Notre Dame.

                        Seventh-best opponent: Notre Dame played Miami (52nd) on a neutral field and won by 38. Alabama visited Tennessee (54th) and won by 31. Georgia hosted Georgia Tech (63rd) and won by 32. Most impressive of the three: Notre Dame.

                        Eighth-best opponent: Notre Dame hosted Purdue (62nd) and won by three. Alabama visited Arkansas (65th) and won by 49. Georgia visited Auburn (84th) and won by 38. Most impressive of the three: Alabama.

                        Ninth-best opponent: Notre Dame hosted Pittsburgh (66th) and won by three in triple overtime. Alabama hosted Western Kentucky (82nd) and won by 35. Georgia visited Kentucky (92nd) and won by five. Most impressive of the three: Notre Dame.

                        Tenth-best opponent: Notre Dame played Navy (73rd) at a neutral site and won by 40. Alabama hosted Auburn (84th) and won by 49. Georgia hosted Georgia Southern (99th) and won by 31. Most impressive of the three: Notre Dame.

                        Eleventh-best opponent: Notre Dame hosted Wake Forest (113th) and won by 38. Alabama hosted Florida Atlantic (127th) and won by 33. Georgia hosted Florida Atlantic (127th) and won by 36. Most impressive of the three: Notre Dame.

                        Worst opponent: Notre Dame visited Boston College (121st) and won by 15. Alabama hosted Western Carolina (204th) and won by 49. Georgia hosted Buffalo (135th) and won by 22. Most impressive of the three: Notre Dame.

                        Eight times out of 12, the Irish have had the most impressive performance when assessing comparable opponents. Notre Dame is 2-0 against the Sagarin top 10, whereas Alabama is 0-1 and Georgia is 1-1. Notre Dame is 4-0 against the Sagarin top 20, whereas Alabama is 2-1 and Georgia is 1-1.

                        So don't say the Irish haven't been seasoned by a schedule every bit as difficult – no, more difficult – than the SEC top dogs. And they've had far fewer games where they just had to show up to win.

                        Five of Georgia's 11 victories are over objectively terrible opponents – teams ranked 80th or lower nationally by Sagarin. Alabama has four victories over teams ranked 80th or lower. Notre Dame only two.

                        A lot of people point to the Irish vulnerability against the likes of Purdue and Pittsburgh as evidence they are Not SEC Tough. But Georgia fans who white-knuckled through scary wins over Tennessee or Kentucky – two teams so disappointing they fired their coaches – know that a good team can struggle on a given Saturday. Alabama is the only one of the three to dispatch overmatched opponents without a peep of protest.

                        The myth perpetuated by SEC fans is that every week is such a bloodbath, nobody from outside the league could withstand the grind. Yet in the month of November, the average Sagarin rating of Georgia's opponents was 70th. After opening against Michigan, Alabama didn't play anyone in Sagarin's top 30 for the next seven games.

                        Notre Dame didn't go more than three straight games without playing a Sagarin top 20 team.

                        It's easy to say the Irish can't match up with the SEC, not as easy to prove. The ultimate proof will be on the field Jan. 7, but until then SEC fans would be wise to tone down the towering arrogance.

                        Comment

                        • seaplus
                          Posts a lot
                          • Apr 2009
                          • 4869

                          Originally posted by NAHSTE


                          THEY ARE RANKED HIGHER BECAUSE THEY ARE KNOWN TO BE BETTER TEAMS
                          known to be better teams? you sound like the ACC refs who say they study game film to know who they should and shouldn't be calling fouls on. watch the damn games and decide there. fuck history and what is generally known. shit changes
                          *<|8-D

                          Comment

                          • NAHSTE
                            Probably owns the site
                            • Feb 2009
                            • 22233

                            Originally posted by seaplus
                            known to be better teams? you sound like the ACC refs who say they study game film to know who they should and shouldn't be calling fouls on. watch the damn games and decide there. fuck history and what is generally known. shit changes

                            It's subjective polling, based on perception. LOL at "forget what is generally known" ...

                            Comment

                            • seaplus
                              Posts a lot
                              • Apr 2009
                              • 4869

                              Originally posted by NAHSTE

                              It's subjective polling, based on perception. LOL at "forget what is generally known" ...
                              opinions based on recent events (games from all of this year) to decide rankings is obviously okay with me. what i have a beef with is using irrelevant events (from past years) to make a decision ... i thought i made that clear by using the word "history"

                              i didn't bother to read a lot of the previous posts so if i interpreted your post wrong ... oh well. i still feel strongly about the subject and this felt like a great time to vent about those damn ACC basketball refs
                              *<|8-D

                              Comment

                              • Jayrock
                                mini MJ
                                • Apr 2012
                                • 1828

                                SEC DEFENSES SO GOOD SEC SPEED NOBODY CAN COMPETE....


                                .....conferences best two teams put up 30 points on each other.

                                Comment

                                Working...