Frank Gore fined $10,500 for wearing socks too low

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BigBucs
    Unpretentious
    • May 2009
    • 12758

    Frank Gore fined $10,500 for wearing socks too low

    How can player safety be top priority when Brady gets a 10k fine for his slide while Gore gets fined 500 more for a uniform violation? The NFL is a joke.

    Frank Gore fined $10,500 for wearing socks too low



    We sometimes forget the amount that professional athletes get fined for various infractions is a massive amount of money in the real world. Some safety will deliver an illegal hit and be rung up with a big fine, and we kind of overlook that the amount could be used to buy a Mercedes.

    So try to contextualize this bit of news: San Francisco 49ers running back Frank Gore was fined $10,500 for wearing his socks too low during the NFC championship game. ESPN's Adam Schefter reported the news:

    Adam Schefter ✔ @AdamSchefter

    Not made up as much as it sounds like it: 49ers RB Frank Gore fined $10,500 today for wearing his socks too low in NFC Championship Game.
    Let that sink in. NFL players are required to wear their socks high to meet with the bottom of the uniform pants. Gore wore his socks about a foot too low down his leg, and for this, the NFL is going to take TEN THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS from him.
    Did you even notice Gore's low socks against Atlanta on Sunday? Would you have noticed in the picture above had the headline not tipped you off to look? Does it matter to you if you did? Probably not. And for that, Gore paid enough money to send a family on a Hawaiian cruise. Just a guess, but the fashion statement probably wasn't worth the money for Gore.

    In fairness, this can't be Gore's first warning from the NFL's "sock police." The league generally doesn't give out massive fines on a first offense, and they're on the field before the game looking for violations and will try to let the player know if he needs to fix something to avoid any punishment. Gore very likely ignored many warnings before the big fine came down. And the NFL isn't wrong to want to keep its uniform standards, or it opens itself up to players modifying the uniform however they want.

    But still, in a real life way, fining a a guy more than $10,000 because his socks weren't above his knees seems excessive. Who knows how much the league might make him pay if his socks aren't right on Super Bowl Sunday.




  • ram29jackson
    Noob
    • Nov 2008
    • 0

    #2
    its more interesting that Pollard wasnt fined for the hit on Ridley

    Comment

    • Aso
      The Serious House
      • Nov 2008
      • 11137

      #3
      Originally posted by ram29jackson
      its more interesting that Pollard wasnt fined for the hit on Ridley
      Apparently that was a completely legal hit. I guess he wasn't considered defenseless? But what's interesting is Gore was fined more for his socks than for Brady's slide towards Reed's knee.

      Comment

      • Youk
        Posts too much
        • Feb 2009
        • 7998

        #4
        Good, I'm glad they are stopping these guys from flying off the edge.

        Comment

        • kmanharris
          Seven
          • Oct 2008
          • 6427

          #5
          Originally posted by ram29jackson
          its more interesting that Pollard wasnt fined for the hit on Ridley
          why would they have fined him? Ridley initiated the helmet to helmet contact by lowering his head.

          Comment

          • JeremyHight
            I wish I was Scrubs
            • Feb 2009
            • 4063

            #6
            Originally posted by ram29jackson
            its more interesting that Pollard wasnt fined for the hit on Ridley
            Since when is hitting a runningback high when he is carrying the ball a penalty?

            Comment

            • Aso
              The Serious House
              • Nov 2008
              • 11137

              #7
              Originally posted by JeremyHight
              Since when is hitting a runningback high when he is carrying the ball a penalty?
              It was helmet to helmet which should always make you wonder with todays rules. Do you not remember James Harrison's hit on Josh Cribbs as well as other examples around the league?

              Comment

              • ThunderHorse
                Grind.
                • Nov 2008
                • 2702

                #8
                Ridley brought that on himself. There's no way that's a penalty. He wasn't defensless in the slightest and he made a mental decision to try and play big man with Pollard and he lost.

                I'm afraid that people will look at hits like that, which I absolutely love about football, and say that they need to take out any contact above the shoulders in the rules because of player safety. It's downhill from there. I've already noticed some defensive players in this league have stopped trying to make contact above the waist on pass defense plays and they've just started going for the knees.

                Next thing you know the NFL will say no contact below the knee cap and no contact above the shoulders. And at that point we might as well strip all the pads, take out the forward pass, and just start playing Rugby.

                Comment

                • kmanharris
                  Seven
                  • Oct 2008
                  • 6427

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Aso21Raiders
                  It was helmet to helmet which should always make you wonder with todays rules. Do you not remember James Harrison's hit on Josh Cribbs as well as other examples around the league?
                  Here's the play. This play and the Ridley play are COMPLETELY different.



                  Harrison led with his head and aimed for Cribbs' head while Cribbs didn't see him coming. The flag was not for a hit to a defenseless receiver.

                  Ridley saw Pollard coming AND lowered his head himself before the contact. He initiated the helmet to helmet.

                  Comment

                  Working...