Packers set to release Charles Woodson

[Primetime]

Hard to get stats when people are avoiding your side of the field

Cuz they just loved throwing the Charles over the years too. Keep trying here though.

[KINGOFOOTBALL]

Bailey was not more consistent than Woodson. Bailey had two stellar years in the middle of his career. Othan than that, he didn't have more than 3 INTs in any season since 2001. Easy to say stats don't matter when he gets absolutely killed by every measurable stat in the book, and Charles did it in less games.

Well that about wraps it up. The second a guy starts arguing CBs and only wants to talk about stats youre dealing with the clueless. Please look up some pancake block numbers to tell me how Leonard Davis was better than Steve Hutchinson.
Im glad you agree with Glenbino that Asante Samuel > Charles Woodson. I mean we gotta stick with the stats right ?

[Primetime]

Well that about wraps it up. The second a guy starts arguing CBs and only wants to talk about stats youre dealing with the clueless. Please look up some pancake block numbers to tell me how Leonard Davis was better than Steve Hutchinson.
Im glad you agree with Glenbino that Asante Samuel > Charles Woodson. I mean we gotta stick with the stats right ?

Charles numbers hump Samuel's too, but let's take every stat out of the game because being a game changing playmaker somehow is terrible compared to a coverage corner.

[Realist]

Cuz they just loved throwing the Charles over the years too. Keep trying here though.

Guess you think he is better than Deion Sanders was too right?

[Primetime]

Deion Sanders was a first-ballot HoFer. This whole thing started because KoF questioned whether or not Woodson was even a HoFer, which he clearly, clearly is.

[KINGOFOOTBALL]

Charles numbers hump Samuel's too, but let's take every stat out of the game because being a game changing playmaker somehow is terrible compared to a coverage corner.

Even with your sole argument being stats you suck at this. Samuels "out intercepted him" in half the seasons theyve had in common , has a ton more passes defended and simply butt rapes Woodson when comparing first ten years of career.

Seriously you suck at this.

[Primetime]

Even with your sole argument being stats you suck at this. Samuels "out intercepted him" in half the seasons theyve had in common , has a ton more passes defended and simply butt rapes Woodson when comparing first ten years of career.

Seriously you suck at this.

Okay. Here it comes...

Let's give them the same amount of games at 206.

Asante: 70 INT, 8 TD, 8 FF, 4 FR, 574 Tackles, 225 PD, 0 Sacks
Chalres: 55 INT, 12 TD, 29 FF, 11 FR, 934 Tackles, 135 PD, 17 Sacks

If you want to put in added value (I'm not big on the stat): Charles 134, Asante 121

Through the career, again, Charles kills it.

[KINGOFOOTBALL]

Okay. Here it comes...

Let's give them the same amount of games at 206.

Asante: 70 INT, 8 TD, 8 FF, 4 FR, 574 Tackles, 225 PD, 0 Sacks
Chalres: 55 INT, 12 TD, 29 FF, 11 FR, 934 Tackles, 135 PD, 17 Sacks

If you want to put in added value (I'm not big on the stat): Charles 134, Asante 121

Through the career, again, Charles kills it.

That bolded stat isnt even right. And I have no idea what this added stat is...is that bubble gums chewed , white girls fucked ??

[Primetime]

That bolded stat isnt even right. And I have no idea what this added stat is...is that bubble gums chewed , white girls fucked ??

206/146*50 = 70.5 This isn't rocket science KoF.

[ralaw]

Woodson vs Bailey is an interesting debate, but I think common consensus was that Bailey was better. Bailey is a first ballot HOFer, but I can see the back end of Woodson's Oakland career hurting him. I think Woodson is a HOFer, but he is going to have to wait.

[KINGOFOOTBALL]

206/146*50 = 70.5 This isn't rocket science KoF.

Thats not any kind of science. Did you really just project statistics to compare CBs ?
Then you take your concoction and tell me that a guy with 15 more INTs and 100 more passes defended who you project as the 3rd all time in INT in NFL history ....is the lesser CB ?
All the time arguing that I should be comparing them statistically ?

Maybe you should hang out here for awhile.

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/

[leaffan]

Thats not any kind of science. Did you really just project statistics to compare CBs ?
Then you take your concoction and tell me that a guy with 15 more INTs and 100 more passes defended who you project as the 3rd all time in INT in NFL history ....is the lesser CB ?
All the time arguing that I should be comparing them statistically ?

Maybe you should hang out here for awhile.
http://www.footballoutsiders.com/

Was going to post footballoutsiders

Beauty website that I wish I paid for the subscrition because it would shit all over primetime right now just based off the minimal stats we can see.

[Primetime]

Thats not any kind of science. Did you really just project statistics to compare CBs ?
Then you take your concoction and tell me that a guy with 15 more INTs and 100 more passes defended who you project as the 3rd all time in INT in NFL history ....is the lesser CB ?
All the time arguing that I should be comparing them statistically ?

Maybe you should hang out here for awhile.
http://www.footballoutsiders.com/

It's called a proportion. You can't possibly be this dumb.

Asante is great at INTs and PD. Charles is great at literally everything a CB does.

[leaffan]

It's called a proportion. You can't possibly be this dumb.

Asante is great at INTs and PD. Charles is great at literally everything a CB does.

Proportions simply don't work when it comes to DB stats and they certaintly don't even work for your arguement because your using the wrong stats.

[Primetime]

Proportions simply don't work when it comes to DB stats and they certaintly don't even work for your arguement because your using the wrong stats.

Please provide the fake stats you would like me to use instead. The only point is that Woodson is a more productive player, which is obvious but dense skulls don't get it.