Best & Worst Colleges for Converting Elite Recruits into NFL Draft Picks

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Atlas
    BRACK FRIDAY BUNDURU!!!!!
    • Feb 2010
    • 7949

    Best & Worst Colleges for Converting Elite Recruits into NFL Draft Picks

    Best & Worst Colleges for Converting Elite Recruits into NFL Draft Picks


    By mtripat
    Thursday, April 25th, 2013

    CLICK HERE FOR OUR SERIES ON CONVERTING COLLEGE BASKETBALL TALENT INTO NBA PICKS.
    CLICK HERE FOR OUR SERIES ON BEST COLLEGE BASKETBALL FAN BASES.
    WE WILL BE LAUNCHING A SERIES OF POSTS RELATED TO COLLEGE FOOTBALL STARTING IN JULY. PLEASE FOLLOW@SPORTSMKTPROF FOR UPDATES.
    As a follow-up to our previous post, we would like to provide a more complete view of the best and worst colleges based on converting elite recruits into NFL Draft picks (number of draft picks divided by the number of four and five star recruits). This study considers the last six NFL drafts, and examines the top sixty schools in terms of relevant recruiting cycles over the past twelve years. We exclude schools that have not produced a single draft pick in the 2007-2012 period or that have less than four elite recruits over the relevant recruiting cycles.
    Since there have been a considerable number of inquiries, it should be noted that the University of Alabama finished in the middle of the pack. While the table above is produced from a rather straight-forward statistical analysis (descriptive statistics for each school), we would like to stress that our main results are derived from multiple linear regression models. The key result is the significant negative relationship between the number of four-star prospects and the draft conversion rate of high ranked prospect. It is also worth noting that while we focused on the ratio of draft picks to elite recruits we also conducted a number of other analyses that focused on alternative measures of draft success such as the number of Day 1 or First round picks per elite recruit. Our key finding was replicated across the various models.

    By Dr. Mike Lewis & Dr. Manish Tripathi, Emory University 2013

    #5



  • Golden Taters
    RIP West
    • Jul 2009
    • 6640

    #2
    Well at least we're number 1 in something....but Wazzu doesn't get "elite recruits" so I'm pretty confused.

    Comment

    • Pitty
      Death, Taxes, Jeff Capel
      • Feb 2009
      • 7541

      #3
      Pitt.

      Comment

      • jaxjaggywires
        Eradicator!!
        • Feb 2009
        • 1693

        #4
        So, the schools who get the highest number of top recruits are the worst statistically at getting them drafted? Seems to be a factor of those blue chippers not being able to cut it in competition with the other talent, whereas schools who don't tend to get a lot of top HS stars tend to focus on them.

        No real surprise here...
        ...in my pants
        Fred Taylor for the HOF!
        Facebook - Twitter

        Comment

        • NAHSTE
          Probably owns the site
          • Feb 2009
          • 22233

          #5
          Questionable methodology.

          Comment

          Working...