Vick THINKS he is entitled to $10,000,000.00 per year

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Point Blank
    Needs a hobby
    • Oct 2008
    • 14184

    #46
    Originally posted by Senser81
    All of them. DirectTV has been around for a few years now. What is your point?
    Are you a Falcons fan or something?

    And I had to ask. Most people just went by what they seen on SportsCenter and not what ACTUALLY happened in the games. And yes it does matter..

    Comment

    • Senser81
      VSN Poster of the Year
      • Feb 2009
      • 12804

      #47
      Originally posted by Hokie
      Just keep on bringing up arguments about things no one has said Senser. Keep them coming.
      Why did you thank killgod's post? He was ripping on you.

      Comment

      • Senser81
        VSN Poster of the Year
        • Feb 2009
        • 12804

        #48
        Originally posted by Point Blankâ„¢
        Are you a Falcons fan or something?

        And I had to ask. Most people just went by what they seen on SportsCenter and not what ACTUALLY happened in the games. And yes it does matter..
        So you have no point? I'm discussing football here, not ESPN programming.

        Comment

        • ThunderHorse
          Grind.
          • Nov 2008
          • 2702

          #49
          This isn't even a discussion...

          It's one guy shitting on a great football player because he obviously is bitter or just flat out doesn't like him.

          Comment

          • Point Blank
            Needs a hobby
            • Oct 2008
            • 14184

            #50
            Originally posted by userpikk187
            I'm never going to hate on a player unless he's Tom Brady, and I'm physically incapable of having any type of love towards Tom Brady, because I'm a Colts fan. but when you watch Atlanta play, you see the real season they are so successful is because of they're superb ability to effectively run the football, and when that was shut down in the playoff game in Arizona, despite Ryan throwing 2 TD passes, they still couldn't win the game.
            You're right but despite Ryan playing more like a rookie and Turner getting shut down, we still had a chance to win that game. I won't go into all that though. If you watched the game you know what I'm talking about.

            Comment

            • ThunderHorse
              Grind.
              • Nov 2008
              • 2702

              #51
              Originally posted by Point Blankâ„¢
              You're right but despite Ryan playing more like a rookie and Turner getting shut down, we still had a chance to win that game. I won't go into all that though. If you watched the game you know what I'm talking about.
              Its incredible if you think about it.

              Atlanta really SHOULD have won that game, even when Turner had been shut down and Ryan had done average, if not well considering how young he is.

              But what's really incredible about it is, this was a 4-12 team last year, that probably should have been playing in the Super Bowl.

              Comment

              • Senser81
                VSN Poster of the Year
                • Feb 2009
                • 12804

                #52
                Originally posted by userpikk187
                but for those thinking that Matt Ryan's impact on the Falcons is purely the reason that had such a successfull year the season, not to mention they put the flourishing passing game on his shoulders along with, and this is the first I've ever heard anyone say this, the running game also. it isn't true.
                Thats not what I said, so I don't know who 'those' are. Matt Ryan being able to throw the football had an effect on Roddy White and Michael Jenkins...that was my point. Your point was that the increased production of White and Jenkins was coincidental, or due to Michael Turner being a running threat (as if Vick wasn't a running threat when he played).

                Comment

                • Point Blank
                  Needs a hobby
                  • Oct 2008
                  • 14184

                  #53
                  Originally posted by Senser81
                  So you have no point? I'm discussing football here, not ESPN programming.
                  I will rephrase what I said. Usually when the dumb ass Vick haters, hate on Michael Vick they have no idea what the fuck they're talking about. They just see the highlights/stats on TV and automatically assume that he played like shit when they don't what actually went down in the game. That's my point. I asked YOU to see if you was one of those people. Catch my drift?..

                  Comment

                  • Senser81
                    VSN Poster of the Year
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 12804

                    #54
                    Originally posted by Hokie
                    Go fight a Michael Vick cardboard cut out
                    I thought I was already fighting two Michael Vick cardboard cut outs?

                    Comment

                    • Point Blank
                      Needs a hobby
                      • Oct 2008
                      • 14184

                      #55
                      Originally posted by Hokie
                      Brooking!! Good ridance. Wasn't the only problem, but he was awful in coverage.
                      That's exactly what I was aiming at :laugh:

                      Comment

                      • LiquidLarry2GhostWF
                        Highwayman
                        • Feb 2009
                        • 15428

                        #56
                        I'm on board with senser...Mike Vick was pretty bad as a quarterback. In hindsight, I'm sure the owner of the Falcons wouldn't have things any other way, then they are now. He has a franchise QB, one of the better young teams in football, and none of the drama that surrounded Vick...aka good pub.

                        I wouldn't give Vick much more than a back up job and a vets minimum salary upon his return. Been gone form the game and incarcerated for 2 years now...he had little skill as a QB before and he won't be the fastest guy on the field anymore.

                        Comment

                        • ThunderHorse
                          Grind.
                          • Nov 2008
                          • 2702

                          #57
                          Originally posted by Senser81
                          Thats not what I said, so I don't know who 'those' are. Matt Ryan being able to throw the football had an effect on Roddy White and Michael Jenkins...that was my point. Your point was that the increased production of White and Jenkins was coincidental, or due to Michael Turner being a running threat (as if Vick wasn't a running threat when he played).
                          I never said it was coincidental, I said that coincidence could be a possibility. I also said that the possibility of it being coincidental is extremely minute, and more probably, not likely.

                          But your last little bit there is nothing more then a sad attempt to help your argument.

                          We know there is a big difference between a running QB and a Runningback, we also have already confirmed that Matt Ryan is a better quarterback then Michael Vick, meaning he obviously can step up and throw a pass accurately, and not worry about tucking the ball and scrambling in meaningless situations.

                          Vick's running threat is completely different from Turner's running threat. and you know that.

                          Comment

                          • Senser81
                            VSN Poster of the Year
                            • Feb 2009
                            • 12804

                            #58
                            Originally posted by Point Blankâ„¢
                            I will rephrase what I said. Usually when the dumb ass Vick haters, hate on Michael Vick they have no idea what the fuck they're talking about. They just see the highlights/stats on TV and automatically assume that he played like shit when they don't what actually went down in the game. That's my point. I asked YOU to see if you was one of those people. Catch my drift?..
                            As I said before, I am not one of those people. I obviously have an idea as to what the fuck I am talking about. Perhaps you should have directed this question to Hokie and userpikk?

                            So, again, you have no point?

                            Comment

                            • ThunderHorse
                              Grind.
                              • Nov 2008
                              • 2702

                              #59
                              I mean, shit, I'm sorry that if Matt Ryan walks into the room I don't get on my knees and offer to suck his dick like you apparently do.

                              But I've always been just as critical towards Vick's quarterback play when it comes to throwing the ball.

                              I didn't know defending a great player made you a "cut out", but I guess I'm a cut out of a lot of guys in the league who were great players.

                              Comment

                              • Point Blank
                                Needs a hobby
                                • Oct 2008
                                • 14184

                                #60
                                Originally posted by Senser81
                                As I said before, I am not one of those people. I obviously have an idea as to what the fuck I am talking about. Perhaps you should have directed this question to Hokie and userpikk?

                                So, again, you have no point?
                                You didn't answer the damn question the first time. It was a yes or no question. No need for the extra shit.

                                Comment

                                Working...