You thought Ramses Barden was a big WR..

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rayman
    Spic 'n Spanish
    • Feb 2009
    • 4626

    #31
    Originally posted by Tailback U
    I assume you're talking about Turner, and I can't disagree, as I don't think Turner will be a good pro WR at all.

    All I'm saying is that I find it funny when guys are "high" on guys they have never seen play over guys who they have seen play. Especially when the guy they haven't seen play padded his stats against pop warner competition.

    They're basically just listening to Kiper and McShay's hype and falling for it and then claiming it as their own, "I'm really high on Ramses Barden." No, you're not, you just believe what everyone else is saying because you haven't even seen the guy play one full game.
    I'm talking about Barden, although Turner fits the description some as well. At least Turner did it against the best competition.

    Best case scenario is that Barden becomes some sort of beast after a 3 year learning curve, but I don't see it. He's a novelty.

    Could be a pretty good TE, though.



    Comment

    • Berowsk
      Fuck Bitches, Get Wawa.
      • Oct 2008
      • 8860

      #32
      Originally posted by Tailback U
      If Kyle Orton was still there to throw him bombs this guy would have been unstoppable.

      fail for the wrong team.
      sigpic

      Comment

      • Tailback U
        No substitute 4 strength.
        • Nov 2008
        • 10282

        #33
        Originally posted by BEROWSK
        fail for the wrong team.
        Oops. I mixed the giant WRs up. Ingraham was the 6'9" WR for Purdue. He graduated a few years ago though, I think.

        I just really wanted to post that ridiculous cartoon picture of Orton.

        Comment

        • Rayman
          Spic 'n Spanish
          • Feb 2009
          • 4626

          #34
          Those Purdue cartoons were all hilarious though.



          Comment

          Working...