Guida vs Pettis is what's wrong with MMA

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Liquidrob
    Izzy is a bum
    • Feb 2009
    • 11785

    Guida vs Pettis is what's wrong with MMA

    So, what did guida actually do to win? Did he land more strikes? Did he have any sub attempts? What did he do to win?

    Pettis landing more strikes from the bottom and actually controlled guida more from the bottom with wrist control and sub attempts, even his brief time on top was better than clays entire time on top

    MMA is scored like garbage, it's killing the sport, exciting, innovative fighters 'lose' because of crappy judging and no one cares
    Liquidrob's Top 10 Fighters Rankings


    The 10 Fighters Who Changed The Game

  • SHOGUN
    4 WR 1 RB 0 TE. 24/7/365.
    • Jul 2009
    • 11416

    #2
    Didn't you know, rob? Takedowns and shoulder shrugs finish fights.

     
    "Sometimes I just want to be with my family and watch movie and eat some popcorn. But when I step on the mat I know there is no other place I'd rather be." - Marcelo Garcia

    Comment

    • EmpireWF
      Giants in the Super Bowl
      • Mar 2009
      • 24082

      #3
      Active guards would be nice if they scored them better...but in the end, Guida controlled the fight. Pettis couldn't defend the takedowns and was only in a dominant position momentarily in the final round. IIRC, he only came close once or twice with subs, but Guida quickly fended them off and returned to maintaining his control.

      With the way the rules are now, the result was correct.

      Obviously takedowns are given a lot of credit compared to fighting off your back, but everyone knows this.


      Comment

      • CrimsonGhost56
        True Blue
        • Feb 2009
        • 5981

        #4
        i think this is also another example why there needs to be 5 round fights for main events

        Comment

        • Liquidrob
          Izzy is a bum
          • Feb 2009
          • 11785

          #5
          Originally posted by EmpireWF
          Active guards would be nice if they scored them better...but in the end, Guida controlled the fight. Pettis couldn't defend the takedowns and was only in a dominant position momentarily in the final round. IIRC, he only came close once or twice with subs, but Guida quickly fended them off and returned to maintaining his control.

          With the way the rules are now, the result was correct.

          Obviously takedowns are given a lot of credit compared to fighting off your back, but everyone knows this.
          What did he control?

          Pettis did more what he wanted than clay did, pettis landed strikes and went for subs, guida did nothing he wanted to do, no strikes landed and no sub attempts
          Liquidrob's Top 10 Fighters Rankings


          The 10 Fighters Who Changed The Game

          Comment

          • Liquidrob
            Izzy is a bum
            • Feb 2009
            • 11785

            #6
            Originally posted by CrimsonGhost56
            i think this is also another example why there needs to be 5 round fights for main events
            Another one of my issues, even worse for pettis because he was the champ of a zuffa org, kid got screwed
            Liquidrob's Top 10 Fighters Rankings


            The 10 Fighters Who Changed The Game

            Comment

            • CrimsonGhost56
              True Blue
              • Feb 2009
              • 5981

              #7
              pettis really did get hosed from start to finish. i never wanted to see edgar-maynard 3 even though i thought the second fight was good. there's too many contenders waiting to go to a rubber match with two of the blandest personalities in the sport. should of been edgar-pettis after the draw and maynard could of waited his turn.

              Comment

              • Liquidrob
                Izzy is a bum
                • Feb 2009
                • 11785

                #8
                It seems that the only 'effective' ground fighting can be from the top position, something has to be changed, just like the torres/mighty mouse fight, torres had reversals, sweeps, sub attempts, what did MM do? Got takedowns?

                This is not a wrestling match, it's a fight
                Liquidrob's Top 10 Fighters Rankings


                The 10 Fighters Who Changed The Game

                Comment

                • Liquidrob
                  Izzy is a bum
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 11785

                  #9
                  Bas weighs ins

                  @BasRuttenMMA said:

                  I am not taking anything away from Guida, he did what he needs to do and actually has no choice to do something different. But, Pettis was attacking on his feet, and he was attacking on the ground, non stop. There should be something done with refereeing, otherwise we are gonna see way more of these fights, we are already seeing some. If somebody takes you down, but can't really get the better of the person he took down, they, at least, shouldn't count that takedown.

                  Its what I have been saying for a long time, if somebody takes you down and just holds you, they should count that takedown AGAINST him. Now, this was of course not the case with Guida, so you can give him the takedown, but on the ground, all the attacks (pretty much) came from Pettis, I am just saying, that should count for something as well.

                  People say, "Yeah, but submission escapes should count for something as well", yes, but NEVER more then the submission attacks.

                  Like I said in an earlier tweet, if somebody attacks on the feet, and the other one just defends, and only "once a while" throws something back. Then , even when the person who attacks doesn't land a strike, HE is the aggressor, and in a striking match, HE will win the fight if it goes to a decision.
                  In a ground fight, the guy who goes for submissions should be awarded more then the guy who defends them and only "once a while" tries one of his own, exactly the same as standing.

                  That's my thought about this whole thing, again, I don't wanna take something away from Guida, he played a smart game, but it needs to be said.

                  Godspeed and Party on!!
                  Liquidrob's Top 10 Fighters Rankings


                  The 10 Fighters Who Changed The Game

                  Comment

                  • Warner2BruceTD
                    2011 Poster Of The Year
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 26142

                    #10
                    There is nothing that can be done until the judging gets more sophisticated. Its a young sport, and the judging is way behind in the evolutional curve.

                    I think they need to get more retired fighters and refs involved in the judging process. Most of these judges are either old boxing or kickboxing judges. Thats absurd. Give me Pat Miletich, Bas Rutten, and Mario Yamazaki and tell Nelson Hamilton & Cecil Peoples to get lost.

                    Comment

                    • EmpireWF
                      Giants in the Super Bowl
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 24082

                      #11


                      Comment

                      • LiquidLarry2GhostWF
                        Highwayman
                        • Feb 2009
                        • 15429

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Liquidrob
                        So, what did guida actually do to win? Did he land more strikes? Did he have any sub attempts? What did he do to win?

                        Pettis landing more strikes from the bottom and actually controlled guida more from the bottom with wrist control and sub attempts, even his brief time on top was better than clays entire time on top

                        MMA is scored like garbage, it's killing the sport, exciting, innovative fighters 'lose' because of crappy judging and no one cares
                        I think the real issue is the boxing like scoring to MMA bouts.

                        This method has been going on forever, so, everyone is used to it and it leads to not enough 10-7's, 10-8's, and 10-10's rounds.

                        Comment

                        • Liquidrob
                          Izzy is a bum
                          • Feb 2009
                          • 11785

                          #13
                          The guard is a nuetral position, jugdes don't understand it, of course 'points' should be rewarded for the takedown is that TD actually leads to something, but if all you do is stay on to and do no damage, don't pass or whatever it should be negated if the guy on bottom is striking, getting near subs, being active, hugging isnt scoring

                          Look at MM vs Torres, MM got the TD, Torres swept him, what did that TD get? nothing, TD's do no damage unless it's a slam and even that's not damaging for the most part
                          Liquidrob's Top 10 Fighters Rankings


                          The 10 Fighters Who Changed The Game

                          Comment

                          • SHOGUN
                            4 WR 1 RB 0 TE. 24/7/365.
                            • Jul 2009
                            • 11416

                            #14

                            Did guida land one punch in the second round

                            I might wrestle some dudes but guida didn't attempt to pass guard one time a whole new level of dry humping
                            When Ben Askren calls you out, you know shit is serious.

                             
                            "Sometimes I just want to be with my family and watch movie and eat some popcorn. But when I step on the mat I know there is no other place I'd rather be." - Marcelo Garcia

                            Comment

                            • EmpireWF
                              Giants in the Super Bowl
                              • Mar 2009
                              • 24082

                              #15
                              Originally posted by SHOGUN
                              http://twitter.com/#!/benaskren
                              When Ben Askren calls you out, you know shit is serious.
                              :ohmy:

                              :cookiesmug:

                              :doorrofl:



                              Comment

                              Working...