OK there is always a conflict of interest for someone somewhere This is strictly opinionated if you look at Reggie Miller I believe he has a list with Bill Russell at PF, there are no set rules or guidlines to where you play a guy. Not even in the NBA.
Yeah but then there is the reality of the position the guy actually played.
I mean at U of I they had Head, Brown, Williams all of which PG's then Powell and Augustin... Where was the C on the team.
College motion offense =/= NBA. Technically Williams was the point as he handled the ball most often. Brown was the 2 and Head was the 3. Powell 4 and Augustine 5.
I think Lebron has the abilities of a PG, So I put him there. Mike and Kobe can switch off at the 2 and 3 all night long hell mike even played a lil SF when you had a line up of Kerr, Harper, Jordan, Pippen, Kukoc on the floor which happened quite a bit.
Actually it didn't happen "quite" a bit, but a player adjusting on the floor for a short stretch to play the 3 is not the same as acutally playing the position on a consistant basis over a
20 year career Why is this so hard to understand?
No one has ever viewed MJ as a SF. No one ever calls Bill Russell one of the greatest "power fowards of all time". No one. You know why? Because the position they played 99% of the time was SG and C.
Yeah Lebron handled the ball a lot for a SF but he still isn't the PG on the Cavs. No one thinks that. At best he is a "point forward" like what Pippen was a lot but still Pippen is always listed as a SF because that's where he played.
Now for the whole Larry Bird him not being capable of playing PF is like telling Dirk he cant either Bird could do everything. This convo is pointless on who cant play what position and who cant there were no set guidelines for this.
You're an idiot. No one ever said Bird wasn't capable of playing the PF position. No one. What was said was it's moronic to say Bird played PF for the Celtics when McHale was the PF, and Bird rarely played the position. It's even dumber to make a lineup with Bird at the PF(a position he rarely if ever played) and then not list Tim Duncan there saying Tim Duncan isn't a "pure PF" when he
actually played the position.
Nice job missing the point.
Oh and BTW from a Bull fan Jordan was no the dominate ball handler (Bringing the Ball up) Pip was, Jordan did do it at times but Pip was the main ballhandler
Thank you captain obvious. No one ever said Jordan was the "dominate ball handler". All that was said was that he brought the ball up quite a bit. Which he did. But that still didn't make him the PG.
Here's a new all-time starting 5 based on all these idiots logic:
PG: Yao Ming- Went behind his back once in the open court. Karazy dribbles!
SG: Manute Bol- I remember him shooting 3's a few times.
SF: Tim Duncan- Awesome bank shot. Not a pure PF but a hell of a SF
PF: Michael Jordan- I remember him posting up a lot.
C: John Starks- Scrappy inside guy. Dunked on Horace Grant.