Look, you nimrod, I'm going to say this one last time, so hopefully you can wrap your puny little mind around it: you brought this up and purported it as fact. And, since YOU are the one that brought it up as fact, when YOU are asked to show proof of said fact (saying that you think it was broadcast on some radio station somewhere at some point in time isn't proof, numnuts), it is YOUR responsibility to provide said proof, otherwise it can no longer be considered as fact in the context of the debate (or in any context, really). That's how debates/arguments over disputed facts work, and it's how they have worked for a long long time.
If you CAN'T or REFUSE to provide a factual backing for your claims, then there is no choice but to revert back to what I implied earlier: you are some kind of retard of a Yankees fan that made a completely unfounded claim about the importance of the Yankees-Red Sox series to everybody everywhere, and made that claim to justify actual facts (you remember those, right?) reported. Then, after being called out to answer for and provide proof of those things you purported to facts, you resorted to the tired old claim of "being too busy" or "too good" to answer to someone on a message board.
And since you have yet to find and link us to any type of media outlet outlining ANYTHING that would help your cause, I must assume that you are as such that I described above.
.
