LiquidLarry2GhostWF
Highwayman
Not really. WCW pre-Nitro wasnt all that much different than TNA today.
-WCW was losing money pre-Nitro. TNA is (slightly) profitable in 2009.
-WCW had very strong tv exposure and tons of support from Turner. TNA has good tv exposure, and tons of support from Spike.
-WCW had a very talented roster, that most felt was more talented than the 1995 WWF roster. TNA has a very talented roster, that many feel is better than the WWE roster.
-WCW aquired Hulk Hogan, TNA aquired Hulk Hogan.
The only real difference between the two, is WCW had a very loyal and decades long established fan base of southern wrestling fans. TNA has the same couple of million people who watch Impact every week, and the same couple thousand people who buy the PPV's. So they are working with a much, much smaller base audience.
You forgot money...biggest difference between WCW and TNA is money behind it...Turner would put an infinite amount of money behind WCW, including infinite amounts of TV time on his own channels...he could basically bring in any of the WWF's guys (and did...Hogan, Savage, Luger, Nash, Hall, Madusa, Bret Hart eventually...some of the biggest names in wrestling.)...and had the money to keep their own guys Sting and later guys like Goldberg.
TNA can't compete like that...they can't get those kind of names in their company (Hogan of '10 isn't quite the same as Hogan in '95)...
While TNA's general landscape has some semblance of early WCW, its booking is more closely resembling very late WCW.