Rams interested in Vick?

[BUCK3YE5]

But he's even worse now than he was then..........

LOL so are you saying he was bad?

 

[FirstTimer]

LOL so are you saying he was bad?

He was overrated as fuck and nothing more than an average QB. He's worse now.

 

[BUCK3YE5]

lmao

 

[FirstTimer]

lmao

Nice counter argument. Dumb ass.

So are you saying Vick was actually good? He never did anything of real note other than run for 1000 yards which is a meaningless stat for a QB because it's nearly impossible for a QB to lose rushing yardage when he drops back to pass seeing as sacks come off of his passing yardage....Plus the previous record was held by Bobby Douglass and outside of marrying a playboy bunny Douglass did nothing of note during his time in the NFL.

 

[mcstl25]

Nice counter argument. Dumb ass.

So are you saying Vick was actually good? He never did anything of real note other than run for 1000 yards which is a meaningless stat for a QB because it's nearly impossible for a QB to lose rushing yardage when he drops back to pass seeing as sacks come off of his passing yardage....Plus the previous record was held by Bobby Douglass and outside of marrying a playboy bunny Douglass did nothing of note during his time in the NFL.

Say what you will about Vick, but as a starter he was 10 games over .500. He may be a average to below average QB, but his teams won more than lost with him as the starter. If Vick came to St. Louis and won 6 games next year they'd have a parade for him at the end of the year.

I don't particularly want Vick in St. Louis, but after winning a total of 6 games the past 3 years, I say why the hell not. I've been a Bulger supporter, but his time is over with. If the Rams draft a QB in the 2nd round and bring Vick in for a year or two, I'd be okay with that.

 

[FirstTimer]

Say what you will about Vick, but as a starter he was 10 games over .500. but his teams won more than lost with him as the starter.

Grossman was 19-12 as a starter and went to a Super Bowl.

Plus Vick's record as a starter was actually getting worse each of his last three seasons.

I don't particularly want Vick in St. Louis, but after winning a total of 6 games the past 3 years, I say why the hell not. I've been a Bulger supporter, but his time is over with. If the Rams draft a QB in the 2nd round and bring Vick in for a year or two, I'd be okay with that.

I'll give you Lovie Smith back for Stephen Jackson

 

[mcstl25]

Grossman was 19-12 as a starter and went to a Super Bowl.

Plus Vick's record as a starter was actually getting worse each of his last three seasons.


I'll give you Lovie Smith back for Stephen Jackson

I'd probably take Grossman in St. Louis as well!

If the Rams had a top 25 QB I would say hell no to Vick. However, after winning six games in the last three years, something has to change. Remember, a two win season next year would actually be a sign of improvement!

 

[Nukleopatra]

53.7% completion %.
75.9 QB rating.

And that's when he didn't suck.

 

[Esjay]

lmao

You are such a dumb fuck. I understand you're like 13 and grew up at a time all of your little dicked friends were running around talking about how great Vick was, but please, learn something about football before you ever post in the NFL section again.

 

[Esjay]

its no secret that he was never a great qb but hes a great rb with a good ability to throw and i would love to see him start for a team again. really what have the rams to lose after a 1 win season. they need somebody who fills a stadium and brings some excitement back to the franchise and everybody who says vick wasnt a great football player just doesnt know anything about football. dont give me qb stats now but he led the league in yards per carry as a qb in atlanta

Makes perfect sense. Let's totally disregard the most important statistics for his position, in favor of his rushing totals which are nothing more than a bonus. Anyone who THINKS Vick was a great football player doesn't know anything about football. Vick was capable of being an exciting player who made a highlight reel play each game. People are enamored with his big arm and speed because of how fun it is to watch .. except it will never lead any team to any substantial success. You don't even know if he still has the speed/open field ability! He spent 2 years in prison. I'd say he's most likely not as explosive.

Take him in Oakland and lose for another 7-8 years. I'll be laughing my ass off while QB's who can throw the football (you know, what they're required to do) continually win the Super Bowl and the Raiders pick in the top 10.

I guess I should give you a break. You have Bruce Gradkowski as your avatar, you wouldn't know good QB play if it snuck up behind you and stuck it's cock in your keister.

 

[steeljake]

i love how all these vick dick riders come out and try to use his win/lose record only as proof he is anything but a glorified running back. vick had arm strength and speed, thats it. he couldn't read a d, he had little if any accuarcy and his work ethic was a well know issue.

 

[Bear Pand]

There's no one to throw to in St. Louis anyway, they'd probably be better off installing the triple option with Vick and Jackson.

 

[Esjay]

never said that hes the same michael vick he was in atlanta because he isnt but im pretty sure hes more productive than bulger was for them this year.

So are the majority of the starting QB's in the NFL. What are you really saying?

Even still, Bulger completed 56 percent of his passes and was playing behind one of the worst offensive lines I have ever seen in my life without a single receiver worth a piece of dog shit. Vick on the Rams would be a whole lot of him running for his life and begging Steven Jackson to take the ball.

 

[Esjay]

what i said in my previous post. the rams need somebody who fills the stadium and brings some excitement back to a boring team and vick obviously does that

I don't see fans filling a stadium to see one player who is a shell of his former self while the team goes 1-15/2-14 every season. But that's just me.

 

[BUCK3YE5]

I'm not sayin he was good but he wasn't bad

 

[steeljake]

I'm not sayin he was good but he wasn't bad

stfu. please.

 

[Yawkey Way]

i do agree with a point made earlier that trying out the Vick experiment does allow them to not reach on a QB like Clausen or Bradford in the draft who really do not warrant a first overall selection. Being able to draft Suh would help immensely to the defense, Spags always had a good defensive line when he was in New York so I would assume he would try to build that again in St. Louis.

 

[steeljake]

the rams will take suh, this is almost a no brainer. if bulger is really finished and as w2b pointed out his contract is an issue, then vick may not be a bad choice as a hold over. but for idiots like buckeye to suggest he is some kind of a winner is just stupid.

 

[NAHSTE]

the rams will take suh, this is almost a no brainer. if bulger is really finished and as w2b pointed out his contract is an issue, then vick may not be a bad choice as a hold over. but for idiots like buckeye to suggest he is some kind of a winner is just stupid.

Better career win % than Jay Cutler, was better than Brees prior to this year. He may not be a good QB, but he's more of a "winner" than Marc Bulger/insert rookie QB here.

 

[packersfan4eva]

I think the Rams are better off either taking a quarterback in the second/third round or trading to get another 1st round pick and then taking a quarterback.