Shayne/Nukleopatra's forum bet.

[GoChargers]

There will be a Ben Roethlisberger tracking thread tomorrow.

Just have to find my old Roethlisberger stuff. Already got it all written out, from high school up until last season.

Give me 4 hours and Philip Rivers will be joining the party.

 

[SHOGUN]

My bad, dude.

I forgive you. Just keep it in one or two threads from now on.

Half of those threads Nukleheadpatra started himself, and took/trolledover. Blame him for it. Personally it's been a hoot for me over here.

I do blame him for it, but it takes two to tango. The bickering was cute at first but now it's tired as fuck.

If I was bashing Vincent Jackson or Brandon Marshall, Sho would be thanking me.

Dude is biased as fuck, I'm telling you.

:rofl:

 

[Shayn•Da•Pain]

Give me 4 hours and Philip Rivers will be joining the party.

Fuck it...I'm no Tim "Teabager" Tebow fan but this has to happen.

I'm also calling for Flacco/Ryans if it's not already out there. I haven't really checked.

 

[GoChargers]

Fuck it...I'm no Tim "Teabager" Tebow fan but this has to happen.

I'm also calling for Flacco/Ryans if it's not already out there. I haven't really checked.

I do remember a Ryan vs Flacco thread. I don't see the point of that though, neither will be making the playoffs this season so should not crack any top 10 list.

... I'd take Flacco.

 

[Shayn•Da•Pain]

I do remember a Ryan vs Flacco thread. I don't see the point of that though, neither will be making the playoffs this season so should not crack any top 10 list.

... I'd take Flacco.

Yeah I'm in the Flacco > Ryan camp myself. I just like that kid more.

 

[Nukleopatra]

Today 05:16 AMShaynDaPain
Four out of Six 1,000 yard receivers that have played with Kurt, had their best statistical seasons without Warner.

Unless you post the win/loss record of those four players without Kurt Warner, this point is really invalid. My argument isn't about stats - any person who knows me, knows what I think about stats. My argument, is that none of these players who played with Kurt Warner, have won anything without him. I mean, hell, Faulk had decent stats in Indy, but he didn't help them win anything. If he had, he would have probably retired as a Colt.

The only way for you to prove me wrong, is if Torry Holt wins a couple playoff games as a Jag (lol,) or that Arizona continues to strive once Warner retires (Again, lol.)

Drew Brees has great stats... Drew Brees has 1 playoff win in 8 seasons.

Two completely different arguments... and no matter how much you try, the only way for you to ever win this one, is if one of those incompetent fools, wins something without #13 leading the way.

So, really, Sho Gun made the best argument in this thread. Just give the fuck up and move on, and maybe eventually down the road, you'll end up being right.

Or you can come back with the expected - ''well warner hasn't won anything without them either'' nonsense. But that would completely go against your previous case for Holt/Bruce and Faulk, since Warner has a division title and NFC Championship without them, so I know you won't go that route.... Get it? Route? Larry Fitzgerald? lmao.

 

[Nukleopatra]

Yeah. I can just imagine what long winded horseshit you're writing right now.. Probably about how awesome Larry Fitzgerald's 100 yard games, without Kurt Warner, were... And how Issac Bruce put up 1700 yards, which resulted in a below .500 record, or how Faulk's decline in yardage wasn't do to losing Kurt Warner, he was just getting..... old.

Or maybe how Larry Fitzgerald's long reception so far this year is 27 yards, or is it Spiderman? That's worse than Kellen Winslow, or is he Spiderman now? I'm all confused and shit now, due to sleep deprivation. So, I'm going to call it a night, put you on ignore, and I'll talk to you again, when Larry Fitzgerald can put up a 100 yard game without Kurt Warner.. I'll spare you the whole, winning thing, since that's never going to fucking happen, at least without Kurt Warner. Since your case is based on useless stats, we can use that.

100 yards... without Kurt Warner... and you win.

Good luck.

 

[Shayn•Da•Pain]

Unless you post the win/loss record of those four players without Kurt Warner, this point is really invalid. My argument isn't about stats - any person who knows me, knows what I think about stats. My argument, is that none of these players who played with Kurt Warner, have won anything without him. I mean, hell, Faulk had decent stats in Indy, but he didn't help them win anything. If he had, he would have probably retired as a Colt.

The only way for you to prove me wrong, is if Torry Holt wins a couple playoff games as a Jag (lol,) or that Arizona continues to strive once Warner retires (Again, lol.)

Drew Brees has great stats... Drew Brees has 1 playoff win in 8 seasons.

Two completely different arguments... and no matter how much you try, the only way for you to ever win this one, is if one of those incompetent fools, wins something without #13 leading the way.

So, really, Sho Gun made the best argument in this thread. Just give the fuck up and move on, and maybe eventually down the road, you'll end up being right.

Or you can come back with the expected - ''well warner hasn't won anything without them either'' nonsense. But that would completely go against your previous case for Holt/Bruce and Faulk, since Warner has a division title and NFC Championship without them, so I know you won't go that route.... Get it? Route? Larry Fitzgerald? lmao.

Toomer played with Warner in New York. He's has five 1,000 yard seasons, all without Warner Just sayin'.
Toomer's career regular season record = 99-79-1 Just sayin'.
Toomer is 6-5 in the playoffs. Just sayin'.
Toomer has 1 Super Bowl ring, same as Warner. Just sayin'.
Bruce and Holt made the playoffs twice without Warner. Just sayin'.

:yep:

You already lost this bet, I thought you knew.

Josh Mccown is also responsible for, I think two of Larry Fizgeralds three 100 yard games, prior to Kurt Warner. Three 100 yard games in 32 NFL starts, prior to Kurt Warner.. Again, I'm impressed. How Larry hasn't won MVP yet, is beyond me.

Leinart also threw 172 yards to Larry back in '06. It's already happened.
:yep:

 

[Nukleopatra]

I can't even believe how fast my Kurt Warner thread turned into one giant fucking fail. It's not bad enough Shayne posted in the motherfucker, but it also includes a picture of Mark fucking Duper. I mean, who the fuck even remembers Mark Duper, anyway? Talk about a useless fucking hack, who was carried by some David Hasselhoff looking has-been, who couldn't even win a fucking super bowl. Trent Dilfer won a super bowl with worse WRs.

The only thing my thread needs now, is if Doug Williams illiterate fucking ass, learns how to log onto a computer, and find his way in there.

''I wuz betta thin jay scrader, nuk, I thru fer 340 yurds in a soper bowl.''

 

[Shayn•Da•Pain]

I can't even believe how fast my Kurt Warner thread turned into one giant fucking fail. It's not bad enough Shayne posted in the motherfucker, but it also includes a picture of Mark fucking Duper. I mean, who the fuck even remembers Mark Duper, anyway? Talk about a useless fucking hack, who was carried by some David Hasselhoff looking has-been, who couldn't even win a fucking super bowl. Trent Dilfer won a super bowl with worse WRs.

The only thing my thread needs now, is if Doug Williams illiterate fucking ass, learns how to log onto a computer, and find his way in there.

''I wuz betta thin jay scrader, nuk, I thru fer 340 yurds in a soper bowl.''

Didn't you remember, bring up, and post Duper's picture? I sure the fuck didn't.

And Dilfer winning a super bowl only proves the "teams win super bowls, not QB's" argument.

 

[Nukleopatra]

ShaynDaPain
This message is hidden because ShaynDaPain is on your ignore list.

Dude, it's not an actual bet. I put you on ignore because, A: Your sig lags up my computer, which isn't your fault, I know, since my comp is a piece of shit. And, B: You remind me of Larry Fitzgerald, minus the fortune, fame, and hall of fame quarterback to carry you.

If your argument is that Fitzgerald, Holt, Bruce put up useless stats, which haven't lead to postseason success without Kurt Warner - then you win. Which is more than I can say for any of them, ya know?

One man carries that football team. He wears #13. That's the only argument I give a damn about. If you can somehow prove me wrong on that, then my little heart will be crushed. Truth will be revealed come 2011.

Until then, enjoy the show.

You already lost this bet, I thought you knew.

Leinart also threw 172 yards to Larry back in '06. It's already happened.

Yeah. Um, look at the poll options, numbnuts. Do you see any option that says ''1978'' or whenever the fuck Fitzgerald finally broke 100 yards after his rookie season? Nah, you don't, unless, of course, you're related to Doug Williams.

100 yards, no Warner - you win. Let it begin. Of course, even after he does manage to do it, I'll be married with 3 kids, and fucking my next door neighbor, and far too busy to be on VSN, so it's pretty much irrelevant anyway.