Warner2BruceTD
2011 Poster Of The Year
You bank that money to spend at a later date once those younger guys are playing well in the majors. I'd rather have a few less wins at the expense of $70 million, as that makes it easier to stomach overspending for a FA or two in three years when my team is ready to compete again.
Again, nowhere in my posts did I advocate "overspending" or adding $70M to the payroll.
The Mets did nothing to add to the current team. Zero. Zilch. Nothing.
If you recall, I was in support of moving Dickey while his value was highest, I had no problem with that move. But you can restock the farm and add pieces to the current team. There were bargains to be had this offseason, Michael Bourn was one example, and he was reportedly waiting for the Mets to shit or get off the pot for a couple of weeks before he moved on and signed with the Indians.
There is no "sound reason" to open up with a $30M payroll on opening day. Especially with two wild cards where just about everybody has hope unless you are truly terrible. My gripe with the Mets isnt that they aren't running with the Yankees & Dodgers payroll wise, or that they've traded veterans, my gripe is they haven't done a thing to improve the current product. I'm not saying they should have signed Josh Hamilton. But at least throw the fans a bone and add some cheap pieces and act like you're trying to compete.