Super Bowl XLVII: San Francisco 49ers vs Baltimore Ravens

[ram29jackson]

You are the stupidest human being on the face of this planet, and I'm reminded of it every time you post.

You are ignorant and disrespectful. Its sports, If I'm wrong I realy dont care because it means nothing LOL. But the fact is the kid aint nothing but hype until this game is over and quite frankly I am incredibly smarter than you because I'm not a homer fan who insults strangers over the internet in such a childish fashion.

I have found in my years of wisdom which far surpass yours that there is a easy common denominator in most big games like this. And this time he is that.

the game is based on his succeeding or or not. 8 lifetime games is not a Super Bowl ready player and shouldnt be considered as such.

 

[trojan49er]

Sooo...hold on. Until he wins the Superbowl he's all hype? How about that Dan Marino guy? Guess he's all hype too. Or Peyton Manning pre-2007, Elway pre-98. As for Terry Bradshaw? 3 Superbowl rings. Dude must be the GOAT. Brad Johnson and Trent Dilfer? Hall of Fame locks, they won a Superbowl. And, clearly, the only player on the field that matters is the QB. Obviously whatever team has the better QB wins every time. Dumb logic is dumb and saying that the more experienced QB wins is flawed and narrow minded. Not to mention, playing in the Superbowl is a totally different ballgame. Neither QB has played in a Superbowl before.


Oh, and as a side note. When you're trying to say you're smarter than someone else, be grammatically correct in doing so. Otherwise, it kind of defeats the purpose.

 

[Warner2BruceTD]

Sooo...hold on. Until he wins the Superbowl he's all hype? How about that Dan Marino guy? Guess he's all hype too. Or Peyton Manning pre-2007, Elway pre-98. As for Terry Bradshaw? 3 Superbowl rings. Dude must be the GOAT. Brad Johnson and Trent Dilfer? Hall of Fame locks, they won a Superbowl. And, clearly, the only player on the field that matters is the QB. Obviously whatever team has the better QB wins every time. Dumb logic is dumb and saying that the more experienced QB wins is flawed and narrow minded. Not to mention, playing in the Superbowl is a totally different ballgame. Neither QB has played in a Superbowl before.

There are plenty of people, smart people, who pretty much break down the NFL in this manner and see nothing wrong with it. Which is part of the reason i've grown tired of talking about the league.

People were talking about Eli Manning as a lock hall of famer after his second SB win, based solely on the fact that he's won two SB's. And they may be right, which is insanity, because there is no way Eli Manning is an all time great QB. But he has those SB wins, and for some people winning/losing the SB is a zero sum deal that requires no further analysis.

And it has extended itself beyond just lazy QB analysis. People blasting the Falcons for being "losers", despite being a very successful team over the Ryan/Smith era. Matt Ryan isn't a "winner", even though he threw for something like 400 yards and 3 TD's in the NFC title loss. Talk that Smith might have to be fired, which is mental. But the NFL culture is no SB's = nothing else matters.

It's so lazy to break things down this way. It just makes me tired arguing against it. RINGS, bro, RINGS.

 

[ram29jackson]

Sooo...hold on. Until he wins the Superbowl he's all hype? How about that Dan Marino guy? Guess he's all hype too. Or Peyton Manning pre-2007, Elway pre-98. As for Terry Bradshaw? 3 Superbowl rings. Dude must be the GOAT. Brad Johnson and Trent Dilfer? Hall of Fame locks, they won a Superbowl. And, clearly, the only player on the field that matters is the QB. Obviously whatever team has the better QB wins every time. Dumb logic is dumb and saying that the more experienced QB wins is flawed and narrow minded. Not to mention, playing in the Superbowl is a totally different ballgame. Neither QB has played in a Superbowl before.


Oh, and as a side note. When you're trying to say you're smarter than someone else, be grammatically correct in doing so. Otherwise, it kind of defeats the purpose.

what the hell does Dan Marino ( and the rest of your examples) have to do with a 9 game starter ? Nothing.
you are bringing up pointless examples that have nothing to with this. In this game alone is a 8 game starter and that make him the weakest link.
Thats all there is to it.

 

[ram29jackson]

You are the stupidest human being on the face of this planet, and I'm reminded of it every time you post.

Did you forget I'm the only one who said all rookie QBs would be eliminated in the playoffs before the Super Bowl ? Well, thats actually what happened so that would actually make me smarter then everyone :smug:

 

[Palooza]

Did you forget I'm the only one who said all rookie QBs would be eliminated in the playoffs before the Super Bowl ? Well, thats actually what happened so that would actually make me smarter then everyone :smug:

The only one? Whaaaaa? Who thought the Colts, Skins or Seahawks would make the Super Bowl?

 

[Cornelius]

Did you forget I'm the only one who said all rookie QBs would be eliminated in the playoffs before the Super Bowl ? Well, thats actually what happened so that would actually make me smarter then everyone :smug:

THAN everyone. Jesus Christ, you are an idiot.

 

[ram29jackson]

THAN everyone. Jesus Christ, you are an idiot.

nope

 

[Tailback U]

Lol 2 rookies played against each other. The other played for the colts, who nobody picked to come out of the AFC.

Great prediction there rams, you really went on a limb and showed everyone your football genius. Just like when you said Rodgers and the Packers would expose Kaep and the Niners...or how you said Brady and the Pats would beat the Ravens, and the Matt Ryan led Falcons would stop the Niners..oh wait...

 

[ram29jackson]

Lol 2 rookies played against each other. The other played for the colts, who nobody picked to come out of the AFC.

Great prediction there rams, you really went on a limb and showed everyone your football genius. Just like when you said Rodgers and the Packers would expose Kaep and the Niners...oh wait...

lets see.... A SeaHawks fan thought I was nuts, he was wrong. I cant help them eliminating eachother, thats not my problem. And I remember people picking the Colts to beat the Ravens.

I put it in print , no one else did. Win for me. Dont Worry, Kaep will be on the losing team in the Super Bowl.

 

Like I give a flying horses fajita if I'm wrong LOL. At least I'm getting something going on here. Everyone is non committal with their stupid- "gee it will be a good game, who knows who might win bla bla bla, so and so's run game bla bla bla."
an 8 game starter who cant do a decent interview without saying; "Well, like...and like you know" at the beginning of every sentence. And you think he's winning the leagues biggest game?
They wont let him run on them and you think he is getting a pass off against a team who beat the best passers in the history of the game 2 weeks in a row ?

 

[JimLeavy59]

 

[ram29jackson]

Jim Harbaugh is stiff at these SB interviews

 

[Warner2BruceTD]

r29j is a proven SB savant, doubt him and pay the price

im on team r29j

 

[ram29jackson]

r29j is a proven SB savant, doubt him and pay the price

im on team r29j

 

[ram29jackson]

 

[ram29jackson]

 

[x0xHumblex0x]

the 2 weeks inbetween really sucks......
go back to 1 week format

 

[Cornelius]

ramjackson has gone full retard in this thread..

 

[Villain]

it will only be impossible to predict if the inexperienced QB does well.

You're right. Flacco has never been here before so he'll be a real wild card.

 

[EmpireWF]

There are plenty of people, smart people, who pretty much break down the NFL in this manner and see nothing wrong with it. Which is part of the reason i've grown tired of talking about the league.

People were talking about Eli Manning as a lock hall of famer after his second SB win, based solely on the fact that he's won two SB's. And they may be right, which is insanity, because there is no way Eli Manning is an all time great QB. But he has those SB wins, and for some people winning/losing the SB is a zero sum deal that requires no further analysis.

And it has extended itself beyond just lazy QB analysis. People blasting the Falcons for being "losers", despite being a very successful team over the Ryan/Smith era. Matt Ryan isn't a "winner", even though he threw for something like 400 yards and 3 TD's in the NFC title loss. Talk that Smith might have to be fired, which is mental. But the NFL culture is no SB's = nothing else matters.

It's so lazy to break things down this way. It just makes me tired arguing against it. RINGS, bro, RINGS.

Marv Levy says amen.