thoughts on Erin Andrews?

[Houston]

some people seem to be missing a glaring point. she watched Sherman interview with another media outlet and he did the same rant with them. it took place 30 seconds prior to her interview. So when he did the same rant with her, she had no reason to be surprised because she just watched it, then got a hug, then interviewed him.

Since you somehow cant decipher the gif that you posted, read Warner's post, he already addressed that.

 

[ram29jackson]

Sherman still does steroids

 

[Hitman]

It's obvious that Andrews and Sherman are currently fucking. She responded like a concerned girlfriend.

:tiptoe:

 

[ram29jackson]

It's obvious that Andrews and Sherman are currently fucking. She responded like a concerned girlfriend.

:tiptoe:

I prefer Jay Mohr's rendition of her being a gossipy, popular,spoiled debutant high school kid trying to start something

 

[KINGOFOOTBALL]

Are any women sports reporters "good". I never pay attention to what any of them say.

 

[Warner2BruceTD]

I prefer Jay Mohr's rendition of her being a gossipy, popular,spoiled debutant high school kid trying to start something

I love how people are somehow blaming the vapid sideline interviewer for the shameful, orchestrated behavior of the asshole attention whore.

It's like slut shaming without flat out calling her a whore. It's just as bad as calling Sherman a thug to imply the word nigger. Except in her case, she did absolutely nothing to instigate it, which was Sherman's m.o. all along.

 

[JimLeavy59]

Warner seems to take what Sherman did personally, he must of been embarrassed by someone like Sherman when he played high school football granted thats only if he ever hit the field.

 

[Warner2BruceTD]

Warner seems to take what Sherman did personally, he must of been embarrassed by someone like Sherman when he played high school football granted thats only if he ever hit the field.

If you know anything about my posting history you would know that I am not a fan of taunting or showboating. Especially orchestrated displays of attention grabbing along the lines of Sherman or T.O.

I'm not sure if taking it personally is the right description, but it does irritate me as a sports fan. Actually, people defending it is what really irritates me. Call it "get off my lawn" if you like, but a heavy proliferation of this stuff would be damaging to sports.

 

[Maynard]

Since you somehow cant decipher the gif that you posted, read Warner's post, he already addressed that.

nobody care what warner thinks. he is on the same level as ramjackson. he makes a point, its proven false, then he pretends he never made that point.

 

[ryne candy]

I prefer Jay Mohr's rendition of her being a gossipy, popular,spoiled debutant high school kid trying to start something

You lost me at Jay Mohr. I'm a fan of Rome but could never listen to his show, when Mohr was hosting. He was on a local radio station a couple of years ago, while promoting some television show and got upset (hung up on them). They told him he was using old jokes....he didn't take it so kindly.

 

[ram29jackson]

You lost me at Jay Mohr. I'm a fan of Rome but could never listen to his show, when Mohr was hosting. He was on a local radio station a couple of years ago, while promoting some television show and got upset (hung up on them). They told him he was using old jokes....he didn't take it so kindly.

he's a friend of Rome's and an accomplished writer/comedian,actor with a national show. So what if certain entertainment mediums are repetitive? its the biz. I respect him and like his over all personality and some of his body of work.

its more tolerable that that Rome-whats your take- crap from callers

 

[Villain]

Jay Mohr's show is fine.

 

[ram29jackson]

Jay Mohr's show is fine.

but PMS is better !

 

[wr50l]

Almost all sports broadcasters are pure and utter shit. There are a few good guys in there pretty much designed to keep the clowns somewhat on the right track. Who did Andrews kick back to in the Fox studio? I'm assuming it was a handful of retarded former player clowns right?

On that note, it must suck to be a woman in sports broadcasting. You pretty much get to the top (national network) and find yourself pinned to the sideline for inane interviews with a pretty small set of possible answers, all generic and not worth listening to. And your air time is limited to about 30 seconds sandwiched between the "experts" joking around.

 

[ram29jackson]

Almost all sports broadcasters are pure and utter shit. There are a few good guys in there pretty much designed to keep the clowns somewhat on the right track. Who did Andrews kick back to in the Fox studio? I'm assuming it was a handful of retarded former player clowns right?

On that note, it must suck to be a woman in sports broadcasting. You pretty much get to the top (national network) and find yourself pinned to the sideline for inane interviews with a pretty small set of possible answers, all generic and not worth listening to. And your air time is limited to about 30 seconds sandwiched between the "experts" joking around.

how is that a bad thing ? you got hired for your looks and make lots of money for doing really unimportant crap in short spurts.

I prefer that to men's college football and basketball games hiring females to do play by play which happens far too often now.

 

[NAHSTE]

I prefer that to men's college football and basketball games hiring females to do play by play which happens far too often now.

What's the problem with this? If they can do the job, they can do the job. It's not 1957 get this sexist shit outta here, chief.

 

[Houston]

Almost all sports broadcasters are pure and utter shit. There are a few good guys in there pretty much designed to keep the clowns somewhat on the right track. Who did Andrews kick back to in the Fox studio? I'm assuming it was a handful of retarded former player clowns right?

On that note, it must suck to be a woman in sports broadcasting. You pretty much get to the top (national network) and find yourself pinned to the sideline for inane interviews with a pretty small set of possible answers, all generic and not worth listening to. And your air time is limited to about 30 seconds sandwiched between the "experts" joking around.

This is along the lines of what I was thinking. These sideline reports are interviewing people on basic, mundane, and in the end irrelevant stuff. This isn't exactly Nixon in '77 where we need someone to grill them with hard hitting questions.

 

[ram29jackson]

What's the problem with this? If they can do the job, they can do the job. It's not 1957 get this sexist shit outta here, chief.

it doesn't have crap to do with sexism. Its preference pure and simple. I watch men's sports to be in a man's world. I don't want to hear a deep, butchy female voice doing play by play for a man's game. Go do the girl college basketball games where you belong.

I don't care if they can do the job, I just don't want to hear it

 

[Warner2BruceTD]

What's the problem with this? If they can do the job, they can do the job. It's not 1957 get this sexist shit outta here, chief.

This entire thread is sexist. Sherman acted like a mental case, but somehow it's being spun as Andrews fault. If that was Sal Pal or Jim Gray holding the mic, this thread doesn't exist.

 

[SuperKevin]

She's better than like 90% of the guys ESPN rolls out on their 3d and 4th teams