Complete Player Ratings

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kia Kaha
    52Ray_Lewis
    • Dec 2008
    • 1075

    #31
    On the Ravens
    Am i dissapointed? Yes
    Am i going to bitch about it? No

    Beacuse there is no reason to because donny doesnt read these. he reads thoughts at OS but not here

    I am very unhappy with Jared Gaither, Kelly Gregg, Tavares Gooden, Dawan Landry and Frank Walker but after week 1 there be lots of changes so we will just get over it and wait and see ae. I love these new ratings system and if i csay i love them i shouldnt be saying that every player should be higher beacuse that would be contradicting myself lol

    Comment

    • ThunderHorse
      Grind.
      • Nov 2008
      • 2702

      #32
      Originally posted by Kia Kaha
      On the Ravens
      Am i dissapointed? Yes
      Am i going to bitch about it? No

      Beacuse there is no reason to because donny doesnt read these. he reads thoughts at OS but not here

      I am very unhappy with Jared Gaither, Kelly Gregg, Tavares Gooden, Dawan Landry and Frank Walker but after week 1 there be lots of changes so we will just get over it and wait and see ae. I love these new ratings system and if i csay i love them i shouldnt be saying that every player should be higher beacuse that would be contradicting myself lol
      well, you may not want to bitch about your team's, but I will about mine.

      I only have one real problem, 2 if I REALLY want to get into it, but one real problem.

      Gary Brackett is the only solid linebacker on the team, when Clint Session more then proved last year that he is THE best linebacker Indianapolis has seen in the last few years. Session is the hardest hitting linebacker on the team, the most athletic, and the only real linebacker that plays the position like a LINEBACKER and not a glorified safety.

      he's apparently rated a 65, along with Tyjuan Hagler, someone who hasn't done shit in the NFL.

      I guess EA doesn't bother watching Colt games. especially seeing as Joseph Addai is rated in the mid 80's, and if there was any rating to bitch about, it would be his, seeing as he was absolutely terrible last year... Offensive line play or not.

      Comment

      • Saluki
        Ball So Hard
        • Oct 2008
        • 9445

        #33
        I dunno why people get all up in arms about the 1st round of ratings anyway. The ratings are almost always changed again by the time the game goes out. The past two years there's been a roster update ready by the time you take the game out of the package. And the way they do them weekly I wouldn't put too much stock in these ratings.

        Comment

        • Rylo
          Corpse Disgracer
          • Oct 2008
          • 5666

          #34
          Figured the WR's would be terrible (wtf at Camarillo only 82 speed), but WOW at the D-Line being terrible for the Fins. smh

          Comment

          • Kia Kaha
            52Ray_Lewis
            • Dec 2008
            • 1075

            #35
            there is one thing i dont get about theses ratings, it is why the hell did the rookies manage to stay away from the streched ratings, i mean whats the deal with that

            Comment

            • Raidersabc123
              Wakka Wakka
              • Dec 2008
              • 5061

              #36
              Originally posted by Kia Kaha
              there is one thing i dont get about theses ratings, it is why the hell did the rookies manage to stay away from the streched ratings, i mean whats the deal with that
              I agree with the new ratings no rookie should be over 79
              THe MaDDeN GoD

              Comment

              • Tailback U
                No substitute 4 strength.
                • Nov 2008
                • 10282

                #37
                Yeah the rookies are overrated.

                I also don't understand how some guys speed stayed the same from last year while others speed decreased. Is the speed rating based on 40 times or game speed? DeSean Jackson and Eddie Royal both got slower but both had very good rookie seasons and their speed was the reason for the majority of their success.

                And Crabtree is rated higher than the both of them? That doesn't sit well with me.

                Comment

                • JMeist
                  Senior Member
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 1651

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Kia Kaha
                  On the Ravens
                  Am i dissapointed? Yes
                  Am i going to bitch about it? No

                  Beacuse there is no reason to because donny doesnt read these. he reads thoughts at OS but not here

                  I am very unhappy with Jared Gaither, Kelly Gregg, Tavares Gooden, Dawan Landry and Frank Walker but after week 1 there be lots of changes so we will just get over it and wait and see ae. I love these new ratings system and if i csay i love them i shouldnt be saying that every player should be higher beacuse that would be contradicting myself lol
                  I'll give you Landry, Gaither and Gregg...But Frank Walker? The guy is terrible.

                  Comment

                  • Goober
                    Needs a hobby
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 12270

                    #39
                    lol at Denver's dline, now I know Denver's dline sucks so they should all be low, but how is Elvis Dumervil not one of the top guys in the group, I mean he was a 88 last year (could be wrong) and now he's a 65. Dumervil had 5 sacks last year while starting all 16 games, while that bum Tim Crowder was sitting on the bench and only had 1 tackle and no sacks all year!!!! And somehow Crowder is rated higher. Ronald Fields is a fucking 71 and all he did was play special teams last year. What a joke.

                    Comment

                    • Saluki
                      Ball So Hard
                      • Oct 2008
                      • 9445

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Goblinslayer
                      lol at Denver's dline, now I know Denver's dline sucks so they should all be low, but how is Elvis Dumervil not one of the top guys in the group, I mean he was a 88 last year (could be wrong) and now he's a 65. Dumervil had 5 sacks last year while starting all 16 games, while that bum Tim Crowder was sitting on the bench and only had 1 tackle and no sacks all year!!!! And somehow Crowder is rated higher. Ronald Fields is a fucking 71 and all he did was play special teams last year. What a joke.
                      That's not really a very good argument, 5 sacks really isn't very good for 16 games, what EA is saying is that they think if Tim Crowder had the apx 1000 plays dumerville did he could have done slightly better than 5 sacks.

                      Comment

                      • Nukleopatra
                        Posts a lot
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 4365

                        #41
                        The Jags D-line is worse than the Rams?

                        Comment

                        • Kia Kaha
                          52Ray_Lewis
                          • Dec 2008
                          • 1075

                          #42
                          Originally posted by JustinMeister
                          I'll give you Landry, Gaither and Gregg...But Frank Walker? The guy is terrible.
                          yeah because a 60% forced incompletion rate which was one of the best in the league means you suck. He is a great nickel corner and IMo should atleast be a 65. scraping at what he is is ridiculous

                          Comment

                          • Hasselbeck
                            Jus' bout dat action boss
                            • Feb 2009
                            • 6175

                            #43
                            The fact that Aaron Curry is not a 250 makes me very leery of this game.
                            Originally posted by ram29jackson
                            I already said months ago that Seattle wasn't winning any SB

                            Comment

                            • ThunderHorse
                              Grind.
                              • Nov 2008
                              • 2702

                              #44
                              Originally posted by Hasselbeck
                              The fact that Aaron Curry is not a 250 makes me very leery of this game.
                              And on the seventh day, God created Aaron Curry

                              Comment

                              Working...