Somebody explain "Recruit Against" feature?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Hogle
    the franchise
    • Jul 2009
    • 479

    Somebody explain "Recruit Against" feature?

    it makes the recruit less interested in the team you're recruiting against, if you do it well
    sigpic
  • Golden Taters
    RIP West
    • Jul 2009
    • 6640

    #2
    Ok heres how you use it...

    Recruit against pitches that the recruit likes (Most, Very High, High) but only if the other school pitch prestige is low (C+ on down pretty much).

    - points= Good your doing it right
    + points= Bad your making the recruit like the other school more.

    For example.... Washington fucking sucks balls at everything. So their a C- on their pitches. I will recruit against the recruits pitches that he is most interested in. Maybe UW cheated again or something and now they have a pitch with an A. And the pitch with an A is a Most, Very High, or High. Dont recruit against for that pitch as it will only end up you recuiting for THEIR school. So if the pitch value is low but high importance to the recruit then recruit against. Usually it doesnt work well against high prestige teams so I would only suggest this for schools with low pitch values.

    What I usually do is recruit against and then recruit for your school if Im behind on a recruit so your making a move on the recruits top schools much faster.

    I hope that helps, and if your slow or something I could explain it better too. And if you still dont understand it then well you are retarded :D

    Comment

    • Warner2BruceTD
      2011 Poster Of The Year
      • Mar 2009
      • 26142

      #3
      Originally posted by Potatoes002
      Ok heres how you use it...

      Recruit against pitches that the recruit likes (Most, Very High, High) but only if the other school pitch prestige is low (C+ on down pretty much).

      - points= Good your doing it right
      + points= Bad your making the recruit like the other school more.

      For example.... Washington fucking sucks balls at everything. So their a C- on their pitches. I will recruit against the recruits pitches that he is most interested in. Maybe UW cheated again or something and now they have a pitch with an A. And the pitch with an A is a Most, Very High, or High. Dont recruit against for that pitch as it will only end up you recuiting for THEIR school. So if the pitch value is low but high importance to the recruit then recruit against. Usually it doesnt work well against high prestige teams so I would only suggest this for schools with low pitch values.

      What I usually do is recruit against and then recruit for your school if Im behind on a recruit so your making a move on the recruits top schools much faster.

      I hope that helps, and if your slow or something I could explain it better too. And if you still dont understand it then well you are retarded :D
      TREMENDOUS

      Comment

      • Golden Taters
        RIP West
        • Jul 2009
        • 6640

        #4
        Originally posted by BORN4CORN
        ummm... It's a joke of a feature. The end.
        No its not so leave.... :D

        Comment

        • Hogle
          the franchise
          • Jul 2009
          • 479

          #5
          I've even downplayed when their prestige for that pitch was B+, and it worked. Maybe mine was better than a B+, I don't know, but it may not have to be as low as C+
          sigpic

          Comment

          • Maynard
            stupid ass titles
            • Feb 2009
            • 17876

            #6
            there is alot of contradictory info on this. some saying + is good others saying - is good.

            but of all the info i have read, potato actually made the most sense. He confused me by saying washington sucks and then used UW as an example since i thought he was a UW fan :doh:

            Comment

            • Golden Taters
              RIP West
              • Jul 2009
              • 6640

              #7
              Originally posted by Maynard
              there is alot of contradictory info on this. some saying + is good others saying - is good.

              but of all the info i have read, potato actually made the most sense. He confused me by saying washington sucks and then used UW as an example since i thought he was a UW fan :doh:
              Yes -'s are bad, a developer backed me up on this and if you downplay some the other school is really good add +'s are added so you know its not working right.

              For the person who said they downplayed a B+ I just used C+ as an example its possible but its not that likely to downplay a high value pitch. IF you are able to downplay these it usually goes...... 0......-2......0........-2..........So it really isnt that effective.

              And BTW the Huskies suck dick and I will never root anyone on their team or anyone that goes to their shitty softball school.

              Comment

              • packersfan4eva
                Ryan Luxem
                • Dec 2008
                • 9052

                #8
                i use it whenever i discover that one of the recruit's interests is what a school is bad at, i downplay that school in that category. since i'm doing a chise with indiana, most school's are better than me, so i don't use it very often.

                Originally posted by Miggyfan99
                I would get fucked in the ass for WS tickets too... only if Miguel was playing though

                Comment

                • KnightNoles
                  Kdub #9
                  • Jul 2009
                  • 2409

                  #9
                  so when its in the recruit interest and you have + 2 +5 +7 does that mean its working for you or do you want something else?

                  Comment

                  • Golden Taters
                    RIP West
                    • Jul 2009
                    • 6640

                    #10
                    Originally posted by KnightNoles
                    so when its in the recruit interest and you have + 2 +5 +7 does that mean its working for you or do you want something else?
                    When your recruiting for YOUR school +'s are good.

                    When using the recruit against feature -'s are good.

                    Comment

                    • Maynard
                      stupid ass titles
                      • Feb 2009
                      • 17876

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Potatoes002
                      Yes -'s are bad, a developer backed me up on this and if you downplay some the other school is really good add +'s are added so you know its not working right.

                      For the person who said they downplayed a B+ I just used C+ as an example its possible but its not that likely to downplay a high value pitch. IF you are able to downplay these it usually goes...... 0......-2......0........-2..........So it really isnt that effective..
                      i dont care if its right or not, you are the only person to make sense when explaining it and thats good enough for me


                      Originally posted by Potatoes002
                      And BTW the Huskies suck dick and I will never root anyone on their team or anyone that goes to their shitty softball school.
                      haha....i knew you were a pullman fan and was hoping it would rile you up....anyone who roots for team named pullman is alright in my book

                      Comment

                      • KnightNoles
                        Kdub #9
                        • Jul 2009
                        • 2409

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Potatoes002
                        When your recruiting for YOUR school +'s are good.

                        When using the recruit against feature -'s are good.

                        Alright thanks, I knew + were good when recruiting for me, but I got some + when recruiting against and interest was going up for me and questionin it.

                        Thanks for clearing it up..

                        Comment

                        • Maynard
                          stupid ass titles
                          • Feb 2009
                          • 17876

                          #13
                          thanks again potato....i did some testing on you were 100% correct. i saw the - numbers, plus the recruit made a comment at the top of the screen that was obviously based on him being "sold" on the downplay option

                          Comment

                          • Golden Taters
                            RIP West
                            • Jul 2009
                            • 6640

                            #14
                            No problem guys.

                            Comment

                            Working...