TitanFall

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Atlas
    BRACK FRIDAY BUNDURU!!!!!
    • Feb 2010
    • 7949

    Comment

    • padman59
      Slayer of Demons
      • Mar 2009
      • 5709

      Not big or surprising news, but Titanfall is officially not going to PS4. It does sound like it was originally only a timed exclusive for the Xbox though.

      Comment

      • KNUBB
        WHITE RONDO
        • Jun 2009
        • 7973



        Comment

        • Swarley
          A Special Kind of Cat
          • Jul 2010
          • 11213

          Microsoft throwing that money at EA.

          Last edited by Swarley; 10-29-2013, 11:50 PM.

          Comment

          • Primetime
            Thank You Prince
            • Nov 2008
            • 17526

            Originally posted by padman59
            Not big or surprising news, but Titanfall is officially not going to PS4. It does sound like it was originally only a timed exclusive for the Xbox though.

            Comment

            • killgod
              OHHHH WHEN THE REDSSSSS
              • Oct 2008
              • 4714

              Titanfall: GOTY Edition. Can't wait.

              Comment

              • Atlas
                BRACK FRIDAY BUNDURU!!!!!
                • Feb 2010
                • 7949

                Comment

                • SethMode
                  Master of Mysticism
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 5754

                  I don't understand the relevance of MS paying for exclusivity, or why it always seems to be brought up (shockingly, it's never brought up for Sony exclusives). It's a product that has a lot of people excited, so why wouldn't MS want to make it so that you can only get it on console through them?

                  Comment

                  • Swarley
                    A Special Kind of Cat
                    • Jul 2010
                    • 11213

                    Originally posted by SethMode
                    I don't understand the relevance of MS paying for exclusivity, or why it always seems to be brought up (shockingly, it's never brought up for Sony exclusives). It's a product that has a lot of people excited, so why wouldn't MS want to make it so that you can only get it on console through them?
                    I think it's b/c there was so much hinting at it only being a timed exclusive, then at the last minute new news comes out about EA/Microsoft's deal. It just seems that with all that talk that Microsoft dropped off another truck of money to EA. By no means do I think it's bad, that game will sell quite a few consoles for them, so good for them.

                    As for the Sony comment, does Sony have any third party exclusives? That's why I think this gets more talk, b/c we don't see it that often anymore.

                    Comment

                    • SethMode
                      Master of Mysticism
                      • Feb 2009
                      • 5754

                      Originally posted by Swarley
                      I think it's b/c there was so much hinting at it only being a timed exclusive, then at the last minute new news comes out about EA/Microsoft's deal. It just seems that with all that talk that Microsoft dropped off another truck of money to EA. By no means do I think it's bad, that game will sell quite a few consoles for them, so good for them.

                      As for the Sony comment, does Sony have any third party exclusives? That's why I think this gets more talk, b/c we don't see it that often anymore.
                      Sony owns most of their studios, but I don't think that that's different. They just either bought or filled muiltiple studios with talent. It's not like every Sony studio is filled with Sony lifers that worked for the company and someone at Sony went "I have an idea for a studio. We shall name it Naughty Dog."

                      MS would own Respawn if they could, but I'm sure those guys aren't interested after the Activision debacle. I wasn't so much calling out your post, as much as I just see that chucked around like it's a bad thing (NeoGAF is the worst with this). With the bad blood MS has right now, they need to do everyhting they can, and I think barring some catastrophe, Titanfall is the only guaranteed hit that they are associated with.

                      Comment

                      • Primetime
                        Thank You Prince
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 17526

                        Originally posted by Swarley
                        I think it's b/c there was so much hinting at it only being a timed exclusive, then at the last minute new news comes out about EA/Microsoft's deal. It just seems that with all that talk that Microsoft dropped off another truck of money to EA. By no means do I think it's bad, that game will sell quite a few consoles for them, so good for them.

                        As for the Sony comment, does Sony have any third party exclusives? That's why I think this gets more talk, b/c we don't see it that often anymore.
                        Wasn't TLOU developed by Naughty Dog?

                        Comment

                        • SethMode
                          Master of Mysticism
                          • Feb 2009
                          • 5754

                          Originally posted by Primetime
                          Wasn't TLOU developed by Naughty Dog?
                          They're owned by Sony, so they're first party, but like I said in my post, I see very little difference. I would bet Sony the company has very little say in what Naughty Dog does creatively, and I would likewise bet that if a bunch of the Naughty Dog guys ever wanted to leave, there would be some pay raises going around.

                          Comment

                          • Swarley
                            A Special Kind of Cat
                            • Jul 2010
                            • 11213

                            Originally posted by SethMode
                            Sony owns most of their studios, but I don't think that that's different. They just either bought or filled muiltiple studios with talent. It's not like every Sony studio is filled with Sony lifers that worked for the company and someone at Sony went "I have an idea for a studio. We shall name it Naughty Dog."

                            MS would own Respawn if they could, but I'm sure those guys aren't interested after the Activision debacle. I wasn't so much calling out your post, as much as I just see that chucked around like it's a bad thing (NeoGAF is the worst with this). With the bad blood MS has right now, they need to do everyhting they can, and I think barring some catastrophe, Titanfall is the only guaranteed hit that they are associated with.
                            I'm not saying it's a huge difference. I just think this is why it gets a lot more coverage, b/c it's not something we see as often as we used to.


                            Originally posted by Primetime
                            Wasn't TLOU developed by Naughty Dog?
                            Yeah? They are a first party studio... Naughty Dog's games are published by Sony. TitanFall is being published by EA, not Microsoft.

                            Comment

                            • Atlas
                              BRACK FRIDAY BUNDURU!!!!!
                              • Feb 2010
                              • 7949

                              Comment

                              • jms493
                                Junior Member
                                • Feb 2009
                                • 11248



                                Comment

                                Working...