The Amazing Spiderman (2012)

[Cornelius]

Much obliged.

Holy fuck are TDK fanboys retarded. Glad you lump yourself in there. Goblinslayer is a special kind of retarded. He's proven himself to be a cool cat.

[Pitty]

Holy fuck are TDK fanboys retarded. Glad you lump yourself in there. Goblinslayer is a special kind of retarded. He's proven himself to be a cool cat.

TDK fanboy, lol. Nah I just groan people when they say retarded shit. Editing in TDK was bad? And I'm the jaded one, ho-kay.

[j.hen]

Get your stupid Batman arguments out of the spider-man thread.

[Cornelius]

TDK fanboy, lol. Nah I just groan people when they say retarded shit. Editing in TDK was bad? And I'm the jaded one, ho-kay.

Last thing I'll say about TDK for Jhen's sake. Yes, editing was terrible. Post Harvey party, Batman jumps off the roof and Joker just leaves? It was all over the place, man. I liked the movie. I didn't like it as much as Iron Man. That's completely not retarded, but you not being able to see what I'm talking about is.

[Pitty]

Last thing I'll say about TDK for Jhen's sake. Yes, editing was terrible. Post Harvey party, Batman jumps off the roof and Joker just leaves? It was all over the place, man. I liked the movie. I didn't like it as much as Iron Man. That's completely not retarded, but you not being able to see what I'm talking about is.

That's your example? First of all, this isn't editing, and what did you expect them to spend another 5 minutes with the joker joining in the soiree and drinking cosmos and appletinis? At that point it's not necessary for them to waste time displaying, for the umpteenth time, that the Joker can escape from any situation, it's called inference.

Iron Man is good, but come on now, it has just as many editing errors, but they're small and nearly irrelevant to the cinematic experience, which is the same with TDK.

Fuck your thread boundaries, since Atlas will be the first to tell you we need activities, but as far as the Spideman movie goes, I'm happy they actually have someone playing Peter Parker, one liners and all.

[Buzzman]

So excited for tonight.

[Palooza]

I'm going the 5th on my recovery day off - IMAX/3D.. the works.

[j.hen]

TOMORROW! IMAX 3D

[CCBrink]

TOMORROW! IMAX 3D

I'm going TONIGHT.

[j.hen]

Sits at a 74% right now. Most of the people on Rotten Tomatoes who don't like ASM are just retards who are loyal to Raimi's versions, somehow still like the first 3 movies even today and just can't get their head around why there wasn't a Spiderman 4 with that same piece of shit cast/director.

The only possible reason I can see people liking Raimi's shit stains over a movie that respects the comic book's origin is because these people weren't fans of spider-man or hardly even knew about the character before those movies came out. The first movies introduced people to the character and now the reboot is actually honoring the comics and not just taking the characters and doing the bare minimum with them (like in Raimi's)

I lol'd hard when people were actually getting mad that Peter Parker created web shooters in this movie and the web didn't just magically come out of his body. The point of the web shooters is to show that this Peter Parker kid is a fucking GENIUS. A trait of the character that was almost completely ignored or swept under the rug in the first trilogy.

[IamMedellin]

going tommorow

It better not suck, heard from reviews they tried to dark Knight it...but the trailer had Spidey delivering quips [which were sorely missing from Raimi's spidey]

And w0w Jhen...did u really hate Raimi's spidey that much?

[red33]

idk was ok i guess. It seemed like they wanted a whole new spiderman story while still paying homage to the original. Some parts were pretty stupid but maybe im just getting too old for movies like this where i have to pick apart so many things.

anyways it was better then 3 but 1 and 2 were so much better.

[stevsta]

emma stone


It was a good movie, but with a few tweaks could of been a way better spidey movie

(more spidey-sense,

 

keeping the promise (sets up mary-jane), cutting 3/4 of the showoff scenes at the school, more snarkiness

and in regards to the ending they should of just kept it towards the dark style they were building towards, even though emma stone was a great stacy

 

unless of course they are planning on really killing gwen stacy in the next one

[IamMedellin]

emma stone


It was a good movie, but with a few tweaks could of been a way better spidey movie

(more spidey-sense,

 

keeping the promise (sets up mary-jane), cutting 3/4 of the showoff scenes at the school, more snarkiness

and in regards to the ending they should of just kept it towards the dark style they were building towards, even though emma stone was a great stacy

 

unless of course they are planning on really killing gwen stacy in the next one

 

GWEN MUST DIE!!!!!!

for story's sake... cuz Emma Stone

oh and another thing

 

When casting MJ...

THIS IS MJ


not this

[Palooza]

Sits at a 74% right now. Most of the people on Rotten Tomatoes who don't like ASM are just retards who are loyal to Raimi's versions, somehow still like the first 3 movies even today and just can't get their head around why there wasn't a Spiderman 4 with that same piece of shit cast/director.

The only possible reason I can see people liking Raimi's shit stains over a movie that respects the comic book's origin is because these people weren't fans of spider-man or hardly even knew about the character before those movies came out. The first movies introduced people to the character and now the reboot is actually honoring the comics and not just taking the characters and doing the bare minimum with them (like in Raimi's)

I lol'd hard when people were actually getting mad that Peter Parker created web shooters in this movie and the web didn't just magically come out of his body. The point of the web shooters is to show that this Peter Parker kid is a fucking GENIUS. A trait of the character that was almost completely ignored or swept under the rug in the first trilogy.

ur a homer bro.