Originally posted by kaygdanimal
The Amazing Spiderman (2012)
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Madden4LifeDude, why you get so butthurt over someone hating your faglicious movie? Iron Man was clearly better. The hype surrounding your movie was about a dead dude, not the movie. Get over it.
Originally posted by Madden4Lifeuhmmmmm without Burton's batman, Nolan wouldn't have had a Batman.Comment
-
Originally posted by kaygdanimal
Batman Begins was good. Dark Knight was okay. I actually hated how Christian fucked with Batman's voice but I have to admit I liked the new Harvey Dent (Aaron Eckhart) over the Tommy Lee Jones casting back in Batman Forever. I'm going to have to go back and watch the first Batman from 1989 though because I didn't realize that Harvey Dent was even in that movie. I was too young at the time to pay attention.Comment
-
Originally posted by kaygdanimalGood to see some answers. I don't follow with the production. I tend to wait it out until I see the previews when I get to be surprised.
I liked Daredevil and thought it had potential. I'm not sure of the popular opinion of the movie but I know I liked it.
Thor was just a fucking badass in the comics and I liked the Greek gods from what I remember back during my younger years. I just think a movie based on Thor would be sweet.
As far as Green Lantern, I cannot WAIT.
Regarding the Captain, I was just surprised to see that a movie about him didn't come out post-9/11, you know, with the trend towards patriotism and all that jazz.
I think I saw a Captain America movie on Netflix a while back when browsing but just passed over it.
the new one is supposed to have Kirk's dad from the New Star Trek as CapComment
-
Comment
-
with a darker, more realistic undertone
1. There is no dark or "realistic" undertone to Spiderman. Spiderman has and always should be the reluctant campy hero. Sorry to break it to all of you but Spiderman 1 nailed Peter Parker/Spiderman. There was some creative freedom taken ((skipping gwen going straight to MJ , Organic web shooting)) both worked beautifully.The goblin costume was terrible though.
Ill admit Part 2 was blah...and 3 was trash. But thats Raimis fault for falling in love with the numbers and trying to appeal to the "chick flick" audience. Part 3 was a disaster because he took full control from writing up and destroyed one of the greatest villains in the marvel universe.
2. Batman doesnt have any damn super powers. You have to be gritty and realistic. Batman 1 was just that . The only campiness was the Jokers insanity. Even that was oscar worthy by Nicholson. Nolans take on Joker was different but the tones of both movies was the same as the first Batman. The further that franchise got from that the worse it got.
Having some gritty dirty hyper realistic Spiderman is utterly stupid. Why not just make the Hulk orange.
3. Iron Man was great. Downey was fantastic and the movie was every bit as good as Dark Knight. As "hyper realistic" as you can get about a guy flying around in a red and yellow robot suit.
4. Hollywood is fucking retarded. How do you "reboot" a movie thats 8 years old ,and spawned 2 sequels. Thats like Cameron rebooting Lord of the Rings.
Raimi absolutely screwed the franchise. Spiderman doesnt have great villains.
2 goblins , Lame ass sandman , Lizard.... only Doc Ock and Venom are worth any screen time.
Theres not much left unless you start crossing over to daredevil territory and have Kingpin show up.Best reason to have a license.
Comment
-
lol at Raimi screwing up Spiderman. He was the only reason the 1st two were good. The 3rd one, Sony fucking man raped him, forcing him to use Venom and sandman because they wanted money and they themselves re-wrote the script, and now after he wanted full contol back for Spiderman 4, they said fuck you, we dont want the vulture as the villian in the 4th. YOUR FRIED.
So dumb, i bet Raimi and John Malkovich would've created a great vulture. Then the 5th was all set up for The Professor becomin Lizard.Last edited by Buzzman; 01-13-2010, 06:21 PM.Comment
-
Comment
Comment