Worst Show Never to be Cancelled

[f16harm]

Lord knows, young people (people in general?) in the United States are known for their exceptionally good taste.

Then why is the 18-49 demo group the single most important factor in the television industry? Are you saying that the television industry has their own business wrong?

[Warner2BruceTD]

Big Bang Theory is another unfunny show that people mysteriously watch.

We all know most peole are simple minded dolts who enjoy drivel. So what other point are you trying to make, f16harm?

[Senser81]

Then why is the 18-49 demo group the single most important factor in the television industry? Are you saying that the television industry has their own business wrong?

Are you just trying to play devil's advocate, or are you really this dense?

[Warner2BruceTD]

Then why is the 18-49 demo group the single most important factor in the television industry? Are you saying that the television industry has their own business wrong?

Why are you comparing quality to ratings? There is often no correlation. People like simple entertainment sometimes.

[f16harm]

Big Bang Theory is another unfunny show that people mysteriously watch.

We all know most peole are simple minded dolts who enjoy drivel. So what other point are you trying to make, f16harm?

That this forum's view on most TV is nothing close to the norm and should be viewed with as much insight as a Kornstar homeristic NFL post. I mean, look at the butthurt folks over my initial comment on the first page regarding NBC shows. If young people (identical to those here) "liked" these shows....then their demo numbers wouldn't suck moose cock.

[SethMode]

Then why is the 18-49 demo group the single most important factor in the television industry? Are you saying that the television industry has their own business wrong?

No, but WANTING a group to watch a show and that group watching it aren't the same thing. Arrested Developments target demographic was that, yet no one watched it. It's not necessarily because what that group was watching was better. You keep holding onto ratings as if ratings means it's good television. My counter to that is that most people have poor taste, which is why some of the more critically successful shows either don't last or are supported by the network despite not so great ratings.

[SethMode]

That this forum's view on most TV is nothing close to the norm and should be viewed with as much insight as a Kornstar homeristic NFL post. I mean, look at the butthurt folks over my initial comment on the first page regarding NBC shows. If young people (identical to those here) "liked" these shows....then their demo numbers wouldn't suck moose cock.

You really are quite adept at making some astoundingly bad/pointless arguments sometimes f16harm. What point is it that you're missing? No one is arguing that these shows get good numbers, their arguing that good numbers don't make a good show.

And would you stop with the butthurt crap? No one here is butthurt over anything, except for maybe you. You're WAY too excited about ratings numbers for a dude that has nothing to do with the television industry.

[Warner2BruceTD]

That this forum's view on most TV is nothing close to the norm and should be viewed with as much insight as a Kornstar homeristic NFL post. I mean, look at the butthurt folks over my initial comment on the first page regarding NBC shows. If young people (identical to those here) "liked" these shows....then their demo numbers wouldn't suck moose cock.

Quite frankly, I often worry when my taste in tv/movies/music delves into "the norm".

[BrntO4Life]

That this forum's view on most TV is nothing close to the norm and should be viewed with as much insight as a Kornstar homeristic NFL post. I mean, look at the butthurt folks over my initial comment on the first page regarding NBC shows. If young people (identical to those here) "liked" these shows....then their demo numbers wouldn't suck moose cock.

The latest episode of The Office pulled a 7.87...

Unless you work for Nielsen, I'm unsure why you use ratings as a barometer for quality content.

And butthurt? I only REALLY like Parks & Rec. Are you already this bored? It's only 11 AM where I am.

[Warner2BruceTD]

It seems as though f16harm hates the NBC shows fare more than some of the guys here like them. He's passionate!

Maybe he's the guy watching Mike & Molly, america's #1 new "comedy".

[BrntO4Life]

It seems as though f16harm hates the NBC shows fare more than some of the guys here like them. He's passionate!

Maybe he's the guy watching Mike & Molly, america's #1 new "comedy".

My roommate got roped into attending the live taping of the pilot episode of Mike & Molly. When I asked him how it was, he could only slowly shake his head.

Later, he mentioned it being depressing because, while it was awful, he had a feeling it would be successful.

I imagine f16harm was there, laughing before the "applause" light came on.

Multi-cam sitcoms need to go die in a fire somewhere.

[f16harm]

Why are you comparing quality to ratings? There is often no correlation. People like simple entertainment sometimes.

No, but WANTING a group to watch a show and that group watching it aren't the same thing. Arrested Developments target demographic was that, yet no one watched it. It's not necessarily because what that group was watching was better. You keep holding onto ratings as if ratings means it's good television. My counter to that is that most people have poor taste, which is why some of the more critically successful shows either don't last or are supported by the network despite not so great ratings.

You really are quite adept at making some astoundingly bad/pointless arguments sometimes f16harm. What point is it that you're missing? No one is arguing that these shows get good numbers, their arguing that good numbers don't make a good show.

And would you stop with the butthurt crap? No one here is butthurt over anything, except for maybe you. You're WAY too excited about ratings numbers for a dude that has nothing to do with the television industry.

Quite frankly, I often worry when my taste in tv/movies/music delves into "the norm".

I think both of you guys are very naive, that's all I can say. Because obviously you guys have your own thoughts on the subject.

And SethMode, I understand you are going to go and waste a lot of money at UPenn to administer my doc's vaccinations each year, but please stop with the pompous inferences about knowing my personal life outside of MM or VSN or whatever the fuck we will call this community next month.

P.S. Brnt04Life, Office had 7.87 million viewers. It's demo was 4.0

[BrntO4Life]

your shit is not found to be funny by the young population in this country you seek, because even if total viewers were low, that demo number would be 3.0, 4.0, or 5.0 if young people found the show worth a dick

Office had 7.87 million viewers. It's demo was 4.0

:confused:

Loser4Life

[Senser81]

I think both of you guys are very naive, that's all I can say. Because obviously you guys have your own thoughts on the subject.

And SethMode, I understand you are going to go and waste a lot of money at UPenn to administer my doc's vaccinations each year, but please stop with the pompous inferences about knowing my personal life outside of MM or VSN or whatever the fuck we will call this community next month.

P.S. Loser4Life, Office had 7.87 million viewers. It's demo was 4.0

This post was better than Mike & Molly. I love the "I think you guys are naive...that's all I can say............but, on a side note, Sethmode you suck at life and Brnt you are a loser. Oh, VSN sucks dick."

[f16harm]

This post was better than Mike & Molly. I love the "I think you guys are naive...that's all I can say............but, on a side note, Sethmode you suck at life and Brnt you are a loser. Oh, VSN sucks dick."

I guess it's better than making up stories on VSN about having a wife. Isn't it time for Johnny's drum lesson, Mark?