Worst Show Never to be Cancelled

[f16harm]

But these are the same execs that lose sleep over ratings. Why would they lose sleep?

Because their whole role as execs is to create the lowest quality show that gets the highest number of viewers and demo....come on man, you think these schmucks know more than the guy on VSN who has taken some classes at school?

Don't use logic, just learn to VSN (a.k.a act like a know-it-all douchebag and have your e-buddies help you out by piling on the other person like Jenna Haze at a cock devouring contest)

[BrntO4Life]

still can't believe no one got it yet in post #82....did it need more puns?[/color]

I got it. I also gained an understanding of why you think NBC comedies suck. It wasn't funny.

As for my evidence, I just gave you a bevy of it. Contrary to popular belief, the numbers do sometimes lie.

[f16harm]

I got it. I also gained an understanding of why you think NBC comedies suck. It wasn't funny.

As for my evidence, I just gave you a bevy of it. Contrary to popular belief, the numbers do sometimes lie.

The fact you brainiacs are still trying to come up with interesting ways to prove to me that I should give a shit, CLEARLY (see what I did there) shows you didn't get it.

[Spidey]

Everybody needs to step back, read a conversation, and formulate their own opinions. F16 is spot on in all his arguments. Ratings do matter! Obviously a show with a higher rating will last longer on the air because it's getting ratings! How can you guys not see this?

Ratings also depict popularity, even better than sources such as IMDb or Rotten Tomatoes. Anything that lets a user base provide an opinion will have more people venting (or in this case, giving a bad review) than people logging on to say how great it was. 99% of the people surveyed in the "ratings" are watching the said show for entertainment. The mean rating will reflect some kind of discrepancy week to week, but there are people that are hired to relate ratings from week to week to determine how much an audience likes a show. Obviously, you all were not following the Jay Leno/Conan O'Brien debacle closely.

Lay off F16. Everybody is claiming that he made stupid points, but not once did he bring up any of the points that he was accused of. Just because everybody is hopping on him for expressing his viewpoints doesn't mean you have to, too. Think for yourself for once.



This is a very ironic post. First, you accuse F16 of being pompous, arrogant and self-delusional. After that, you proceed to say in another post (and even imply in this one!) that people who watch popular shows don't matter compared to what you think is "quality."

:henrypalm:

[BrntO4Life]

Because their whole roll as execs is to create the lowest quality show that gets the highest number of viewers and demo....come on man, you think these schmucks know more than the guy on VSN who has taken some classes at school?

...

And no, I haven't only taken classes. But I "won't mention specifics here" other than that I worked for someone who has made quite a few high-grossing films (some of them, quite shitty) and is currently guest-starring on one of those "NBC comedies that suck".

[Berowsk]

...

And no, I haven't only taken classes. But I "won't mention specifics here" other than that I worked for someone who has made quite a few high-grossing films (some of them, quite shitty) and is currently guest-starring on one of those "NBC comedies that suck".

[BrntO4Life]

The public opinion is highly reflected in the Nielson ratings. Don't be blind to that because all of your cronies disagree with F16.

And I will exit this inane argument with a question.

Since when is the "public opinion" a testament to quality? All it indicates are profits and what sells, which is what executives have been pushing on us for some time. Without getting all "J.Hen", what do you think social conditioning comes from?

Is banning gay marriage the best opinion because a majority believes in it?

You tell me to start thinking for myself whilst spouting facts about popular opinion. You're in the fucking herd and you don't even recognize it, but that's okay, because most don't.

[BrntO4Life]

Good. Looks like I made the hints simple enough.

[f16harm]

...

And no, I haven't only taken classes. But I "won't mention specifics here" other than that I worked for someone who has made quite a few high-grossing films (some of them, quite shitty) and is currently guest-starring on one of those "NBC comedies that suck".

good catch before the ninja edit. But you are still missing my point here. I don't know how else to put it. I don't think I can create another post that looks like it is trying to fit into the conversation at hand, but includes every ridiculous arguing point, even a pun back to the Beauty and the Beast posts by Larry.

However, Wheel of Fortune just started here on the East Coast. I'm going to go watch that...because it's ratings are great for a nightly game show, and I think it still has quality after all of these years. (how was that attempt? See post #14)

[Berowsk]

However, Wheel of Fortune just started here on the East Coast. I'm going to go watch that...because it's ratings are great for a nightly game show, and I think it still has quality after all of these years. (how was that attempt? See post #14)

[BrntO4Life]

good catch before the ninja edit. But you are still missing my point here. I don't know how else to put it. I don't think I can create another post that intends to fit in the conversation, that includes every arguing point, even a pun back to the Beauty and the Beast posts by Larry.

However, Wheel of Fortune just started here on the East Coast. I'm going to go watch that...because it's ratings are great for a nightly game show, and I think it still has quality after all of these years. (how was that attempt? See post #14)

If your posting activity had ratings, you'd be through the roof right now.

Doesn't make you a good poster though...


Enjoy Sajak. He's not better than Trebek, though. Even if more people watch.

[Berowsk]

And I will exit this inane argument with a question.

Since when is the "public opinion" a testament to quality? All it indicates are profits and what sells, which is what executives have been pushing on us for some time. Without getting all "J.Hen", what do you think social conditioning comes from?

Is banning gay marriage the best opinion because a majority believes in it?

You tell me to start thinking for myself whilst spouting facts about popular opinion. You're in the fucking herd and you don't even recognize it, but that's okay, because most don't.

Sorry, I didn't know it was still cool to practice Taboo. I never understood counterculture people like you. Usually, shit is popular because it's entertaining. Jersey Shore sucks, I refuse to watch it, but I know a hell of a lot of people that play drinking games with it and still follow the story.

We live in a democracy. Usually public opinion reflects popular opinion. If what's "good, quality entertainment" is decided by one person, well that'd be Facism! That's just not American.


"Yep."

[f16harm]

If your posting activity had ratings, you'd be through the roof right now.

Doesn't make you a good poster though...


Enjoy Sajak. He's not better than Trebek, though. Even if more people watch.

Obviously it was good enough to get you to argue for 6+ hours to someone who couldn't give a shit less.


Suck it, Trebek!

And I'm out......WINNING (Sheen, 20100).

[Berowsk]

Obviously it was good enough to get you to argue for 6+ hours to someone who couldn't give a shit less.


Suck it, Trebek!

And I'm out......WINNING (Sheen, 20100).

[killgod]

Obviously it was good enough to get you to argue for 6+ hours to someone who couldn't give a shit less.

If you didn't give a shit you would have quit 6 hours ago.

Try making sense fucknut.