Buttered Popcorn: Buzzmans Movie Review Thread Part II

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Buzzman
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2008
    • 6659

    #61
    Noah (2014)



    There was a time when I would have seen promotions of Noah and completely written it off. I hate religion and tend to enjoy telling people its voodoo. Why then would I be interested in the biblical retelling of the story of Noah? I’d like to think I have grown to watch any genre of film at this point, but I cannot lie and Darren Aronofsky behind the camera was the only real selling point for me. His previous work includes some of the most compelling forms of art and giving him a budget as massive as it was did enough to drag me to see his latest piece known as Noah.

    We all know the basic outline of the story of Noah and surprisingly this is a very paint by numbers interpretation that I didn’t expect to get from someone like Aronofsky, who loves to be anything but ordinary. He deviates a bit with certain aspects; mainly concerning the “Watchers” who are fallen angels who have been punished for trying to help humanity right their wrongs. You’re introduced to them early on and give the audience a pause for thought. You can’t help but wonder what you’re getting yourself into, but fairly quickly they become a casual part of the film as the building of the Ark comes surprisingly early on in the film. The CGI here is very spotty with a poor use of spontaneous forests sprouting from the ground and animals of all kinds traveling to enter the Ark. It’s something that nearly pulls you out of the experience. Everything up until this point is fairly mixed. I couldn’t tell if it was heading to a place I wanted it to see, but when it becomes a simpler film with its core cast surviving on the Ark, it finds a comfortable ground for the director.

    With time to finally calm down, Noah turns to its title character and lets Russell Crowe show off that he still has it that made him such a household name years ago. He faces the impossible question of man and its right to live on and it clearly eats at him. The power inside of him to choose between blind faith and his family isn’t an easy one nor does it hide from it. Aronofsky does his best to show the despicable acts of man and the punishment judged upon them, but without a harder rating, you only catch glimpse of what might have been. Unfortunately, many of the other characters are very underdeveloped and the film spends a bit too much time on a far too familiar plot involving a jealous son. That’s not to say there aren’t a slew of good performances here, especially by the woman, but this was never going to focus on them as this wasn’t there story, but it would have been a stronger film for it.

    There will no doubt be a wave of controversy with the film, but there shouldn’t be. It doesn’t come off as a preachy film with a hidden agenda but rather a mild action-adventure film with a hint of substance to it. In the hands of many other directors, it wouldn’t have had a chance, but as Aronofsky’s passion project, it could have done a lot worse. Noah isn’t the kind of film I want to see Aronofsky make in the future, but it’s a good enough hiccup in an otherwise great career.

    Grade: B-
    Last edited by Buzzman; 04-09-2014, 02:23 AM.

    Comment

    • Houston
      Back home
      • Oct 2008
      • 21231

      #62
      I'll ask you the same thing I'd ask The Bible.

      How did they fit all of those animals travel to the boat, how did they fit, and was there food?

      Comment

      • Buzzman
        Senior Member
        • Oct 2008
        • 6659

        #63
        Originally posted by Houston
        I have the same questions about this movie as I do the biblical tale.

        How did they fit all of those animals on the boat, and was there food?
        As with the tale, the movie doesn't care to answer your question.

        Comment

        • Houston
          Back home
          • Oct 2008
          • 21231

          #64
          Sounds like the kind of plot holes that deduct from a movie.

          Comment

          • Palooza
            Au Revoir, Shoshanna
            • Feb 2009
            • 14265

            #65
            Originally posted by Houston
            Sounds like the kind of plot holes that deduct from a movie.
            Sounds like you should see the movie before complaining about it.

            Comment

            • Buzzman
              Senior Member
              • Oct 2008
              • 6659

              #66
              The films way of dealing with the food is that the animals are put into a deep sleep. As for the space, its impossible for them all to fit, but when there are rock Angels building the actual Ark, the realistic possibility of them all fitting doesn't really seem like something I should care about.

              Comment

              • Houston
                Back home
                • Oct 2008
                • 21231

                #67
                Originally posted by Palooza
                Sounds like you should see the movie before complaining about it.


                Aronofsky generally bores me and nothing about Noah looks intriguing, I'll pass.

                Comment

                • Buzzman
                  Senior Member
                  • Oct 2008
                  • 6659

                  #68
                  You at least like The Wrestler?

                  Comment

                  • Palooza
                    Au Revoir, Shoshanna
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 14265

                    #69
                    Originally posted by Houston


                    Aronofsky generally bores me and nothing about Noah looks intriguing, I'll pass.
                    So you're concerning yourself with plot holes in a movie you don't care about and will never see. uhhh why?

                    Comment

                    • Houston
                      Back home
                      • Oct 2008
                      • 21231

                      #70
                      Originally posted by Palooza
                      So you're concerning yourself with plot holes in a movie you don't care about and will never see. uhhh why?
                      This movie is based on one of the most popular tales in human history, one that has large plot holes. I was interested in seeing how the writer/director dealt with them. That's why.

                      Comment

                      • Palooza
                        Au Revoir, Shoshanna
                        • Feb 2009
                        • 14265

                        #71
                        Originally posted by Houston
                        This movie is based on one of the most popular tales in human history, one that has large plot holes. I was interested in seeing how the writer/director dealt with them. That's why.
                        Then watch the movie.


                        Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                        Comment

                        • Buzzman
                          Senior Member
                          • Oct 2008
                          • 6659

                          #72
                          Enemy (2014)



                          Last year, Denis Villeneuve surprised audiences with his crime thriller Prisoners. The film seemed to come out of nowhere at the Toronto International Film Festival, with many claiming it the best film of the festival. Little did many realize that wasn’t his only collaboration with Jake Gyllenhaal that he brought to the festival; the other was Enemy. The two films couldn’t be any more different but they both showcase a talent in Villeneuve that we should start to anticipate from here on out.

                          As with many films nowadays, the story is a complex mystery told from the perspective of an unreliable source. You are never quite sure what’s going on as one viewer could interpret it in a completely different manner than another. You can say that with pretty much anything, but the difference here is that you will never determine who is right. In the most generic of ways to explain the basis of the movie, a teacher discovers a third rate actor that looks exactly like him. After digging further, the perception of reality is blurred creating a morale and complex transformation into a much different man. It’s a slow buildup and reveal, but it runs your brain afire. You question what you see, the order in which you see them, and whether it’s actually occurring. It’s a trip in the best way possible. You’ll never look at spiders the same again.

                          At the center of the film is the performance by Jake Gyllenhaal. He effortlessly plays two identical characters with ease despite the only difference between the two characters is their confidence and clothing. It’s just another impressive performance in a long underrated career for the actor. The two woman of the film are personal favorites in Melanie Laurent and Sarah Gordon. They aren’t given a whole lot to do but they are two very important pieces to the puzzle. They are as crucial to organizing the chaos as Gyllenhaal himself. It’s essentially a three actor piece, with strong performances throughout. And did I mention both actresses go full frontal and bask in their natural beauty? Boing!

                          My favorite kind of film is one that sticks with you in some form. That doesn’t mean the film is great or even good, but it leaves you thinking about it for days, even weeks at a time. Enemy does just that on top of being a great film. It’s one of the stronger films to come out this year and hopefully doesn’t get painfully overlooked. It accomplishes just as much if not more than Prisoners. When you see it come back and let’s talk about it. I still haven’t quite nailed down my thoughts on it.

                          Grade: B+
                          Last edited by Buzzman; 04-12-2014, 01:00 AM.

                          Comment

                          • Palooza
                            Au Revoir, Shoshanna
                            • Feb 2009
                            • 14265

                            #73
                            And did I mention both actresses go full frontal and bask in their natural beauty? Boing!


                            wat
                            wat

















                            wat

































































                            wat

                            Comment

                            • Buzzman
                              Senior Member
                              • Oct 2008
                              • 6659

                              #74
                              Laurent is definitely my dream girl.

                              Comment

                              • Palooza
                                Au Revoir, Shoshanna
                                • Feb 2009
                                • 14265

                                #75
                                Originally posted by Buzzman
                                Laurent is definitely my dream girl.

                                Comment

                                Working...