Oswalt to PHI: Waiting For Oswalt's Approval

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Warner2BruceTD
    2011 Poster Of The Year
    • Mar 2009
    • 26142

    #46
    Yeah, the more I think about it, its not even close. Phillies by a mile.

    Comment

    • NAHSTE
      Probably owns the site
      • Feb 2009
      • 22233

      #47
      Originally posted by Blade
      You know Hamels' ERA is .5 lower than your golden boy right?

      And 3 of your guys are over 4.0 ERA, so I still don't think we are equal, we have 3 Aces and 2 of them are having outstanding seasons and one is having a good one. Blanton is on his way to turning it around, he's going deep into games and managing his counts better.

      Phillies > Braves. And you DON'T have the best manager in the NL East. What's he done in the last 5 years? Except for setting a record for how many times he's been kicked out of a game.
      :bizzaro:

      Hamels is an ace?

      And LOL at Oswalt's debut. 3.5 now, but who's counting?

      Comment

      • Blade
        Walking SAM site
        • Feb 2009
        • 3739

        #48
        Originally posted by BobSmuggins
        :bizzaro:

        Hamels is an ace?

        And LOL at Oswalt's debut. 3.5 now, but who's counting?
        Keep living the Dirty South Fantasy Land. Hamel's is an ace period, last year he was hurt and exhausted from the previous year's 220+ innings, that's what happens the first time around, if you don't take care of yourself. Happened to Lee and Doc early in their careers. He is still an Ace on any staff in the MLB and you would want him in ATL so STFU.

        Good job knocking Oswalt too, because he woulda made that debut for you guys too, if you hadn't run out of money and would have acquired him.

        Comment

        • IamMedellin
          Everything Burns...
          • Nov 2008
          • 10910

          #49




          Comment

          • Hasselbeck
            Jus' bout dat action boss
            • Feb 2009
            • 6175

            #50
            The quality of competition Lee goes up against in the AL is much better than what Halladay sees now in the NL.

            But really they're both outstanding pitchers and Philly could have had both of them, now they have an overrated Roy Oswalt instead.
            Originally posted by ram29jackson
            I already said months ago that Seattle wasn't winning any SB

            Comment

            • SethMode
              Master of Mysticism
              • Feb 2009
              • 5754

              #51
              Originally posted by BobSmuggins
              :bizzaro:

              Hamels is an ace?

              And LOL at Oswalt's debut. 3.5 now, but who's counting?
              Come on dude, this is homerism talking.

              Comment

              • Yawkey Way
                Free World Leader
                • Oct 2008
                • 6731

                #52
                Wait, because he did it one season he is now considered an ace? We're allowed to give guys entire seasons to regroup after they do their job?

                I think the Phillies guys and Nahste need to find some middle ground here. In no way shape or form is Cole Hamels a bonafide ace, you don't think "ace" and think of Cole Hamels. Is he a good starting pitcher, yes, but is he an ace, that's largely debatable.

                Hamels ERA, WHIP, BABIP, and FIP are all worse than his 2008 season, and in this "year of the pitcher" his stats do not look as stellar next to a prototypical ace. So please, give me a break with Cole Hamels is an ace, hes not on that elite level yet.

                Comment

                • SethMode
                  Master of Mysticism
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 5754

                  #53
                  Originally posted by Yawkey Way
                  Wait, because he did it one season he is now considered an ace? We're allowed to give guys entire seasons to regroup after they do their job?

                  I think the Phillies guys and Nahste need to find some middle ground here. In no way shape or form is Cole Hamels a bonafide ace, you don't think "ace" and think of Cole Hamels. Is he a good starting pitcher, yes, but is he an ace, that's largely debatable.

                  Hamels ERA, WHIP, BABIP, and FIP are all worse than his 2008 season, and in this "year of the pitcher" his stats do not look as stellar next to a prototypical ace. So please, give me a break with Cole Hamels is an ace, hes not on that elite level yet.
                  I'm all for the middle ground. I wouldn't call him an ace, but ace is a stupid descriptor to begin with. I would merely look at Hamels as someone who has had a good season thus far, like most of, say, the Braves pitchers (outside of Hudson).

                  Honestly though, my comment was based more on the Oswalt part.

                  Comment

                  • NAHSTE
                    Probably owns the site
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 22233

                    #54
                    Originally posted by Yawkey Way
                    Wait, because he did it one season he is now considered an ace? We're allowed to give guys entire seasons to regroup after they do their job?

                    I think the Phillies guys and Nahste need to find some middle ground here. In no way shape or form is Cole Hamels a bonafide ace, you don't think "ace" and think of Cole Hamels. Is he a good starting pitcher, yes, but is he an ace, that's largely debatable.
                    Agreed.

                    Hamels ERA, WHIP, BABIP, and FIP are all worse than his 2008 season, and in this "year of the pitcher" his stats do not look as stellar next to a prototypical ace. So please, give me a break with Cole Hamels is an ace, hes not on that elite level
                    Agreed.

                    Comment

                    Working...