Most underrated player in baseball?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • nflman2033
    George Brett of VSN
    • Apr 2009
    • 2393

    #61
    Originally posted by FirstTimer
    Who ever said Dunn was a "great" baseball player?
    People enamored with his HR, OBP, OPS. The fact that people were putting him in the hall as soon as he hits 500 HR's which was inevitable since to quote W2B he was a mortal lock to hit 40 a year and has never had injury concerns.

    W2btd
    And I've told you before KGjr career may as well been over before setting foot in cincy I hitched about him all the time, not as much as Dunn because Dunn was in the lineup everyday KGjr was on the DL more than he wasn't.

    Comment

    • FirstTimer
      Freeman Error

      • Feb 2009
      • 18729

      #62
      Originally posted by nflman2033
      People enamored with his HR, OBP, OPS. The fact that people were putting him in the hall as soon as he hits 500 HR's which was inevitable since to quote W2B he was a mortal lock to hit 40 a year and has never had injury concerns.

      W2btd
      And I've told you before KGjr career may as well been over before setting foot in cincy I hitched about him all the time, not as much as Dunn because Dunn was in the lineup everyday KGjr was on the DL more than he wasn't.
      I don't think Fed ever labeled him as that. That's kind of my point. You're displacing all this Dunn rage onto Fed for no real reason.

      Comment

      • FedEx227
        Delivers
        • Mar 2009
        • 10454

        #63
        Originally posted by nflman2033
        Side note I love how "fans" dismiss batting average these days I mean last I knew the still award the batting title to the person with the highest batting average, not the highest slugging percentage or OPS. Avg was a good enough stat to rate Babe Ruth, Ted Williams, Joe Dimaggio, Lou Gehrig, Ty Cobb, Willing Mays, ect. but when we talk about Adam Dunn its an overrated stat that no one cares about.
        I think home runs were a big part of Babe Ruth's game, no?

        They also didn't let blacks in the game for a number of years too and it didn't seem to be a problem. Cap Anson was a great player without having to play against blacks.
        VoicesofWrestling.com

        Comment

        • nflman2033
          George Brett of VSN
          • Apr 2009
          • 2393

          #64
          Originally posted by FirstTimer
          I don't think Fed ever labeled him as that. That's kind of my point. You're displacing all this Dunn rage onto Fed for no real reason.
          I said he has always been overrated, and fed said otherwise maybe he is sad it disappointed the Dunn he got this year isn't the Dunn he was hoping for, but if you go back to my initial post in this thread I said unless he is so overrated that he's come all the way around to become underrated its a complete joke to call him underrated. Anyone who wants to contest to Dunn being anything but overrated will always be subject to my Dunn rage, I don't care if they are my favorites poster on here. I have always liked fed, everyone should be happy I am not unleashing my OSU losing rage.

          Comment

          • nflman2033
            George Brett of VSN
            • Apr 2009
            • 2393

            #65
            Originally posted by FedEx227
            I think home runs were a big part of Babe Ruth's game, no?
            Yeah one part, what's his career batting average, you are not proving anything here.

            Comment

            • FedEx227
              Delivers
              • Mar 2009
              • 10454

              #66
              Originally posted by nflman2033
              Yeah one part, what's his career batting average, you are not proving anything here.
              I don't know his career batting average because I couldn't give two shits about an antiqued, out of date statistic that is rarely used in any MLB front office.
              VoicesofWrestling.com

              Comment

              • FedEx227
                Delivers
                • Mar 2009
                • 10454

                #67
                Originally posted by nflman2033
                Your the one that brought up winning teams even though he's never played on one
                Because teams that win are routinely and consistently built using strong starting pitching, good bullpens and DUN DUN! OPS/power.
                VoicesofWrestling.com

                Comment

                • FirstTimer
                  Freeman Error

                  • Feb 2009
                  • 18729

                  #68
                  Originally posted by FedEx227
                  I don't know his career batting average because I couldn't give two shits about an antiqued, out of date statistic that is rarely used in any MLB front office.
                  Massive reach.

                  Comment

                  • nflman2033
                    George Brett of VSN
                    • Apr 2009
                    • 2393

                    #69
                    Originally posted by FedEx227
                    I don't know his career batting average because I couldn't give two shits about an antiqued, out of date statistic that is rarely used in any MLB front office.
                    Funny that they still award the guy with the highest batting average the batting title, seems like MLB would have done something about that.

                    For over 100 years the stat was relevant, I mean as relevant as stats are, now its meaningless.

                    Comment

                    • Warner2BruceTD
                      2011 Poster Of The Year
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 26142

                      #70
                      Originally posted by nflman2033
                      Yeah one part, what's his career batting average, you are not proving anything here.
                      Why would Dunn's batting average matter if he was consistently leading the Reds in OBA ever single year?

                      Sure, I would prefer a single over a walk in most situations, but the name of the game is reaching base!

                      Comment

                      • FedEx227
                        Delivers
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 10454

                        #71
                        Originally posted by nflman2033
                        Funny that they still award the guy with the highest batting average the batting title, seems like MLB would have done something about that.

                        For over 100 years the stat was relevant, I mean as relevant as stats are, now its meaningless.
                        Okay. Cool. It's what they did 100 years ago, so it must be the right thing.

                        You win.

                        I'm trying to nurse this sinus infection, do you know where I can get a bag of leeches?
                        VoicesofWrestling.com

                        Comment

                        • nflman2033
                          George Brett of VSN
                          • Apr 2009
                          • 2393

                          #72
                          Originally posted by Warner2BruceTD
                          Why would Dunn's batting average matter if he was consistently leading the Reds in OBA ever single year?

                          Sure, I would prefer a single over a walk in most situations, but the name of the game is reaching base!
                          At what point did I say his batting average was my sole reason for being overrated.

                          I threw it at the end knowing most peoples opinion on the stat is low.

                          Comment

                          • FedEx227
                            Delivers
                            • Mar 2009
                            • 10454

                            #73
                            Originally posted by FirstTimer
                            Massive reach.
                            Maybe, but there's not many front offices that DON'T employ MBAs these days.

                            Off the top of my head I can bet that Texas, San Diego, Boston (and now Chicago NL), Oakland, Seattle, Blue Jays and Tampa Bay are all teams that rarely, if ever worry about a players batting average.
                            VoicesofWrestling.com

                            Comment

                            • Warner2BruceTD
                              2011 Poster Of The Year
                              • Mar 2009
                              • 26142

                              #74
                              Originally posted by FedEx227
                              Maybe, but there's not many front offices that DON'T employ MBAs these days.

                              Off the top of my head I can bet that Texas, San Diego, Boston (and now Chicago NL), Oakland, Seattle, Blue Jays and Tampa Bay are all teams that rarely, if ever worry about a players batting average.
                              Mets, too

                              Comment

                              • nflman2033
                                George Brett of VSN
                                • Apr 2009
                                • 2393

                                #75
                                Originally posted by FedEx227
                                Okay. Cool. It's what they did 100 years ago, so it must be the right thing.

                                You win.

                                I'm trying to nurse this sinus infection, do you know where I can get a bag of leeches?
                                So baseball has advanced to the same degree as medicine in the last 100 years.

                                Comment

                                Working...