Deal is done: Greinke to Angels, sources say

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Woy
    RIP West
    • Dec 2008
    • 16372

    #31
    Originally posted by moneyman255
    What does this have to do with the trade? What better package did the Brewers have on the table? I actually really liked this trade for MIL value wise. Scouts think Segura can hit .300 with 20+ SB's as his ceiling with average D at SS. He is just learning the pos. as well. Pena/Hellweg both are solid prospects and can be a #2/#3 SP if they can command the strike zone. Hellweg went 5 IP, 1 H, 0 ER, 6 K in his AA debut , and Pena pitched yesterday and went 7 IP, 1 ER, 6 K as well in his last start. Segura is hitting .445 in 28 AB's so far and 4 SB's.

    With the new free agent comp. rules where teams only get 1 draft pick instead of 2 decreased the value quite a bit. We'll see how this turns out, but there was no way MIL could afford Greinke at 6/130+ which is what it could take to sign Greinke to an extension.



    ^ Shouts to MvP for the sick sig. GFX TEAM BACK

    .

    Comment

    • Villain
      [REDACTED]
      • May 2011
      • 7768

      #32
      Originally posted by ThomasTomasz
      My problem with the trade is that they didn't get any blue chip prospect. They've given quite a few away in recent seasons with the Greinke and Marcum deals. That compensation pick would actually have been better for them, at least in my mind.
      I don't think a "blue chip prospect" is a must for a 2-month rental. It's nice if you can get it, but how many people LOL at the SFG for giving up Zach Wheeler for Carlos Beltran?

      It's not really fair to compare the trade Milwaukee made to get Greinke and the trade they made to let him go. Greinke had different value in terms of team control.
      [REDACTED]

      Comment

      • FedEx227
        Delivers
        • Mar 2009
        • 10454

        #33
        Likewise, most GMs are smart enough now to realize the value of a cost-controlled prospect vs. a rental player, no matter what short term value they give you.
        VoicesofWrestling.com

        Comment

        • Goober
          Needs a hobby
          • Feb 2009
          • 12271

          #34
          Originally posted by Villain
          I don't think a "blue chip prospect" is a must for a 2-month rental. It's nice if you can get it, but how many people LOL at the SFG for giving up Zach Wheeler for Carlos Beltran?

          It's not really fair to compare the trade Milwaukee made to get Greinke and the trade they made to let him go. Greinke had different value in terms of team control.
          I agree that it's unrealistic for Doug Melvin to find a trade partner eqaully inept as Doug Melvin himself.

          Obviously the Brewers got some really risky prospects here, but they're highly regarded enough to think it will work out for them. If Segura and Hellweg, aren't that far behind where Escobar and Odorizzi were ranked in 2010.

          Comment

          • NAHSTE
            Probably owns the site
            • Feb 2009
            • 22233

            #35
            Jean Segura as a Brewer:

            16 G, 58 PA, 11 H, 0 2B, 1 3B, 0 HR, 3 BB, 8 SO, .204/.241/.241 with an OPS+ of 30.

            Comment

            • Warner2BruceTD
              2011 Poster Of The Year
              • Mar 2009
              • 26142

              #36
              Originally posted by NAHSTE
              Jean Segura as a Brewer:

              16 G, 58 PA, 11 H, 0 2B, 1 3B, 0 HR, 3 BB, 8 SO, .204/.241/.241 with an OPS+ of 30.
              this is a mean spirited troll

              reported to the MLB Forum Mods

              Comment

              • Warner2BruceTD
                2011 Poster Of The Year
                • Mar 2009
                • 26142

                #37
                West is on the case

                Comment

                • ThomasTomasz
                  • Nov 2024

                  #38
                  Originally posted by NAHSTE
                  Jean Segura as a Brewer:

                  16 G, 58 PA, 11 H, 0 2B, 1 3B, 0 HR, 3 BB, 8 SO, .204/.241/.241 with an OPS+ of 30.
                  But Greinke is still coming back to the Brewers this off-season, so anything they got in the trade is extra

                  Comment

                  • Villain
                    [REDACTED]
                    • May 2011
                    • 7768

                    #39
                    Originally posted by NAHSTE
                    Jean Segura as a Brewer:

                    16 G, 58 PA, 11 H, 0 2B, 1 3B, 0 HR, 3 BB, 8 SO, .204/.241/.241 with an OPS+ of 30.
                    Zach Greinke as an Angel:

                    6 G, 39.2 IP, 5.22 ERA, 2.2 K/BB, 73 ERA+

                    :greinke:
                    [REDACTED]

                    Comment

                    • Glenbino
                      Jelly and Ice Cream
                      • Nov 2009
                      • 4994

                      #40
                      Originally posted by NAHSTE
                      Awful return for Milwaukee, but if Olt and Teheran weren't touchable I guess this is the best hey could do. Count me in the camp that thinks Segura will never be a star. He's destined for 2nd division regular status due to his fringey glove at SS, IMO.

                      Anyway, will be interesting to see if the Angels offer Greinke an extension. It's almost overkill to have that many good starters come playoff time.

                      Comment

                      • NAHSTE
                        Probably owns the site
                        • Feb 2009
                        • 22233

                        #41
                        Originally posted by NAHSTE
                        Count me in the camp that thinks Segura will never be a star. He's destined for 2nd division regular status due to his fringey glove at SS, IMO.
                        Now that the honeymoon is over, we're a week into his first full season and Gob is already bitching about Segura's range.

                        Comment

                        Working...