Ben is now nothing but a flopper, it is time for him to go
Ben Wallace Hints At Retirement
Collapse
X
-
-
Comment
-
-
They might want Ben to retire, offer to pay him his $14M just to get him off the books.Comment
-
Originally posted by mbuserthis statement is asinine. for the seven seasons that constituted his prime (00/01-06/07), he averaged 12.6 boards, 1.6 steals, and 2.7 blocks. from 00/01-03/04 he averaged 13.4 boards, 1.6 steals, and 3.0 blocks. he's 7th all-time in reb%. dude was a beast for most of his career and well-deserved of most of his accoladesComment
-
Originally posted by mbuserthis statement is asinine. for the seven seasons that constituted his prime (00/01-06/07), he averaged 12.6 boards, 1.6 steals, and 2.7 blocks. from 00/01-03/04 he averaged 13.4 boards, 1.6 steals, and 3.0 blocks. he's 7th all-time in reb%. dude was a beast for most of his career and well-deserved of most of his accolades
Yeah the Bulls overpaid for him and he ended up being a locker room and team cancer there but if anything his lack of production in Chicago shows how much of an aberration his numbers were in Detroit.Last edited by FirstTimer; 06-01-2009, 11:22 AM.Comment
-
Actually it's not. It was clear as day when he came to the Bulls that Wallace himself was not a great defender. Wallace during his Detroit days was simply a good defender on an all around great defensive team.
Yeah the Bulls overpaid for him and he ended up being a locker room and team cancer there but if anything his lack of production in Chicago shows how much of an aberration his numbers were in Detroit.Comment
-
2. I'm not.
I never said it was his fault. But what WAS Ben's fault was him being a pain in the ass from day one and expecting special treatment and being a problem in the locker room.Comment
-
Yes, actually you are wrong. And you've done nothing to prove yourself otherwise.
Facts and numbers > your flawed opinion. Sorry.
And the mere fact that you say Billups D was > Wallace's at the time proves you come into arguments blind and with no sense of actually knowing what the fuck you're talking about. If anything Billups benefited more from that system defensively than Wallace is. Wallace was THE BEST post-defender in the NBA for a half decade, end of story. Theres only 2 other players that would sniff the discussion, Tim Duncan and Kevin Garnett. So even if he was the 3rd best post defender that is FAR from overrated.Last edited by Kuzzy Powers; 06-01-2009, 11:41 AM.Comment
-
I'm sorry but if Wallace was as good as advertised with the Pistons the drop off would not have been as drastic on the floor and he clearly wasn't the player in the locker room the Bulls were hoping for or had heard about. Wallace=overrated. Deal with it.
And the mere fact that you say Billups D was > Wallace's at the time proves you come into arguments blind and with no sense of actually knowing what the fuck you're talking about. If anything Billups benefited more from that system defensively than Wallace is. Wallace was THE BEST post-defender in the NBA for a half decade, end of story. Theres only 2 other players that would sniff the discussion, Tim Duncan and Kevin Garnett. So even if he was the 3rd best post defender that is FAR from overrated.Comment
-
So he was a bust for the Bulls, doesnt mean he was overrated with the Pistons. Sounds like you're just a bitter Bulls fan who didnt get the most out of his investment.
And uhhhhhh what? Dennis Rodman? Ben Wallace wasnt even getting PT in WASHINGTON during Rodman's last FRINGE years with LA and Dallas. (you prob didnt even fucking know Wallace played for Washington) Years in which Rodman was nothing more than a glorified PR disaster. The mere fact that you even mention Dennis Rodman in this argument pretty much sucked your credibility out the window.
And even if you could legitimately include Rodman, which you cant, at all, that would still put Wallace in the top 5. Wallace was far from overrated in Detroit. Any real NBA guy will tell you he was the cream of the post-defense crop and the anchor of the great Pistons D.Last edited by Kuzzy Powers; 06-01-2009, 11:59 AM.Comment
-
Originally posted by mbuserthis is some of the worst logic i've ever seen presented for this type of argument... and i'm being completely seriousComment
-
Take Wallace away from the Pistons and he wasn't even sniffing All-NBA first teams of the All Star team. That tells you a lot about how his perception as a great defender in Detroit wasn't all it was cracked up to be.
I never said Wallace was a scrub so settle down. He just wasn't as good as he appeared to be when he was in Detroit.
And uhhhhhh what? Dennis Rodman? Ben Wallace wasnt even getting PT in WASHINGTON during Rodman's last FRINGE years with LA and Dallas. (you prob didnt even fucking know Wallace played for Washington) Years in which Rodman was nothing more than a glorified PR disaster. The mere fact that you even mention Dennis Rodman in this argument pretty much sucked your credibility out the window.
And even if you could legitimately include Rodman, which you cant, at all, that would still put Wallace in the top 5. Wallace was far from overrated in Detroit. Any real NBA guy will tell you he was the cream of the post-defense crop and the anchor of the great Pistons D.Comment
Comment