NCAA Basketball 09-10 Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pitty
    Death, Taxes, Jeff Capel
    • Feb 2009
    • 7541

    Originally posted by Herm
    Charlotte blew Louisville out by 20 points. It took everything Villanova had to fend off Louisville the other day.

    Pitt is playing surprisingly well though, cheers JD.
    It was a strange year for the Big East non-con. Pitt, Louisville, and WVU all were without key players (Brown, Dixon, Ebanks, Sosa). Although Louisville isn't on Pitt or WVU's level.

    Comment

    • Pitty
      Death, Taxes, Jeff Capel
      • Feb 2009
      • 7541

      Originally posted by silkamilkmonico
      They were undoubtedly better than Lousiville and UCONN, who you had listed as better than any top teams this year, which is absurd.

      And Pitt would have been waxed by UNC. UNC's guards would have run them out of the gym. Pitt couldn't even beat Villanova, who got absolutely worked by UNC. The Pitt and their woulda coulda shoulda scenarios are laughable. UNC "did".
      Ok so you're comparing an all guard team to a post-wing team? Do you know anything about basketball? Nova played the game of their lives. (Let's not forget UNC's 37 Free Throws in that Final Four game)

      Comment

      • Pitty
        Death, Taxes, Jeff Capel
        • Feb 2009
        • 7541

        Originally posted by silkamilkmonico
        I'm assuming Nova's the "all guard" team. Who's the "post win" team? Pitt? If you knew anything about basketball you would know that UNC was an "all position" team, and would have matched well with either or. I don't care who the team is. There wasn' any college team in the nation that could out match UNC last year.

        "Nova played the game of their lives". Yea I'm just going to stop right there. If Pitt was a Championship calibur team they would have matched Nova in the "game of their lives". They lost that game and their 2008-2009 story ended right there to a lower seed, again.

        I could easily make excuses for Kansas last year, when they outplayed Michigan State for 38 and a half minutes only to lose at the very end, but I'm not going too. They lost, period.

        I still can't believe you're comparing teams that have an entire season under their belt to teams that are just getting into conference play. What was UNC, the best team in the nation by far last year, doing at this time? Losing consecutive conference games I believe.
        I'm saying Pitt would have given UNC a game, you're acting like they'd blow them out by 40. Blair is better than Hansborough and Young was better than Green. Lawson was a slight edge over Fields (in big game situations they are closer, otherwise Lawson is much better).
        Last edited by Pitty; 01-14-2010, 01:43 PM.

        Comment

        • nesper
          Junior Member
          • Feb 2009
          • 648

          while suton may have been one of Michigan states best players the slack has picked up. The problem with michigan state is despite having amazing leaders in the PG position going ways back they always have trouble holding on to the ball. I'm not saying they could have beat UNC last year but they would have been competitive if they kept their hands on the ball. Further it's not so much "turning it on in march" as it is playing year in and year out one of the top schedules in the country and reaping the benefits come march.

          Michigan states 3 losses this year are from 3 teams combined to be 39-10 (@UNC, @Texas and neutral court Florida)
          Last edited by nesper; 01-14-2010, 01:56 PM. Reason: records i saw didnt reflect 1 texas win and the unc loss last night fixed

          Comment

          • Pitty
            Death, Taxes, Jeff Capel
            • Feb 2009
            • 7541

            Originally posted by silkamilkmonico
            Not 40, like 20. Probably the same score they beat Mich St, and everybody else. The matchip scenario doesn't even matter. UNC's closest game was Oklahoma. They didn't play well at all, and weren't really threatened the entire game.

            Doesn't matter it's a moot argument. I'm just saying I'm not listening to any argument for Pitt (edit), or anyone else who didn't play UNC. They lost that right to wonder by losing to other teams, all inferior to Carolina, in the tournament.
            This makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

            You can't compare teams because they didn't play? That's like saying Temple is better than Nova because they beat them once.

            Comment

            • Pitty
              Death, Taxes, Jeff Capel
              • Feb 2009
              • 7541

              Originally posted by nesper
              while suton may have been one of Michigan states best players the slack has picked up. The problem with michigan state is despite having amazing leaders in the PG position going ways back they always have trouble holding on to the ball. I'm not saying they could have beat UNC last year but they would have been competitive if they kept their hands on the ball. Further it's not so much "turning it on in march" as it is playing year in and year out one of the top schedules in the country and reaping the benefits come march.

              Michigan states 3 losses this year are from 3 teams combined to be 39-10 (@UNC, @Texas and neutral court Florida)
              They always lose questionable games in the Big 10 and almost always make the Final Four when no one thinks they will. If that isn't the definition of turning it on in March, I don't know what is.

              Comment

              • Warner2BruceTD
                2011 Poster Of The Year
                • Mar 2009
                • 26142

                HOYA PARANOIA

                Hoya man to man pressure D forcing tons of TO's...shooting the lights out, too.

                That UConn comeback looks like it was a real springboard & confidence builder. Hoyas look great.

                Comment

                • Archer
                  Go the fuck outside
                  • Oct 2008
                  • 15303

                  G'Town's D is playing real tough . Seton Hall's bench is trying to keep them in it but I doubt it's going to matter

                  Comment

                  • Warner2BruceTD
                    2011 Poster Of The Year
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 26142

                    Originally posted by Archer
                    G'Town's D is playing real tough . Seton Hall's bench is trying to keep them in it but I doubt it's going to matter
                    Next two:

                    @Pitt
                    @Nova

                    I'll take a split.

                    The key in the Big East is taking care of the jobber teams at home, because the gimmies are few and far between. Tonight, they did that.

                    EDIT: Next 6 wow

                    @Nova
                    @Pitt
                    Rutgers
                    @Syracuse
                    Duke
                    South Florida
                    Last edited by Warner2BruceTD; 01-14-2010, 09:05 PM.

                    Comment

                    • nesper
                      Junior Member
                      • Feb 2009
                      • 648

                      Originally posted by Pitty
                      They always lose questionable games in the Big 10 and almost always make the Final Four when no one thinks they will. If that isn't the definition of turning it on in March, I don't know what is.
                      losing road games in the big ten is common place even the shitty teams have solid chance to pull upsets at home, minus situation like meechigan had during the ammaker/ellerbe years where you are only playing infront of 5000.

                      Comment

                      • Point Blank
                        Needs a hobby
                        • Oct 2008
                        • 14184

                        Lol @ mfers attacking UNC on the last page. This team is young as shit. Overrated? How? Who is saying we're going win a Championship this year or something?
                        Last edited by Point Blank; 01-14-2010, 09:52 PM.

                        Comment

                        • Woy
                          RIP West
                          • Dec 2008
                          • 16372

                          Robert Morris defeats Fairleigh Dickinson 80-73 to improve to 4-1 in the NEC.

                          Our starting point guard, senior Jimmy Langhurst, was in street clothes, but we had three freshmen combine for 42 points. Even with the departures of five seniors this year, we should still run the NEC for years to come. This team is soooooo talented (not compared to the top teams in the nation, but the NEC and lower-level teams).



                          ^ Shouts to MvP for the sick sig. GFX TEAM BACK

                          .

                          Comment

                          • Herm
                            Boomshakalaka
                            • Oct 2008
                            • 9314

                            Originally posted by Point Blank™
                            Lol @ mfers attacking UNC on the last page. This team is young as shit. Overrated? How? Who is saying we're going win a Championship this year or something?
                            Kentucky is going to be in their situation next year. Everyone already had Cousins, Wall, and Patterson penciled in as first round picks. Now the talk is scouts are very high on Eric Bledsoe and he could go first round next year as well I thought Bledsoe would be around 2 or 3 years.

                            Comment

                            • Herm
                              Boomshakalaka
                              • Oct 2008
                              • 9314

                              Most of us are homers in this thread, but i appreciate the insights on different teams around the nation.

                              Comment

                              • Pitty
                                Death, Taxes, Jeff Capel
                                • Feb 2009
                                • 7541

                                Originally posted by silkamilkmonico
                                Pitt was closer to the level of Villanova, then they were to UNC. UNC ended the year last year as one of the more dominating NC's in recent years.

                                Doesn't matter who UNC would have played, they would have ran away with the game.
                                To say that a team that lost to BC during the season would run away with any game is ignorant.

                                Comment

                                Working...