Stephen Jackson Asking For Trade

[FlawLeSs]

He wants to go to NY with Al Harrington.

he said a contender

[James2Stapleton]

i wouldnt want that to happen boobie JJ and D West are three of my fav cavs...behind LeBron

[Buzzman]

his name is Daniel, stopping calling that POS that. Hes not good enough for a nickname.

[The Messenger]

Didn't the Warriors draft Stephen Curry... why would they want Boobie?

Because they're the Warriors?

[Anthony]

LOL @ all the new Cavs fans.

[Whatupdoe44]

It actually could work. Here's one scenario.

Cavs Get:

SG/SF: Stephen Jackson
SF/PF: Brandan Wright

Warriors Get:

PG: Daniel Gibson
SG: Delonte West
PF: J.J. Hickson

The positives are:

• West and Gibson are shooters who can run, which works well in the Warriors' system.
• Stephen Jackson gives the Cavs a more ideal two who can defend more positions effectively.
• Warriors unload Brandan Wright, who has thus far been useless to them.

The negatives are:

• Cavs chemistry might get fucked.
• Warriors overload even more in the backcourt.
• Cavs have no backup at point guard.

I understand that the cavs would obviously do that, but why would the warriors add 2 more guards while trading brandon wright (no matter how much theyve misused him, hes still a very good prospect) for a less intriguing PF prospect (JJ Hickson).

i kno theyre a team full of guards now, add 2 more and it would be downright razy, especially since CJ Watson will be back with GS

[Kuzzy Powers]

It actually could work. Here's one scenario.

Cavs Get:

SG/SF: Stephen Jackson
SF/PF: Brandan Wright

Warriors Get:

PG: Daniel Gibson
SG: Delonte West
PF: J.J. Hickson

The positives are:

• West and Gibson are shooters who can run, which works well in the Warriors' system.
• Stephen Jackson gives the Cavs a more ideal two who can defend more positions effectively.
• Warriors unload Brandan Wright, who has thus far been useless to them.

The negatives are:

• Cavs chemistry might get fucked.
• Warriors overload even more in the backcourt.
• Cavs have no backup at point guard.

LMAO @ this thrade.

Jesus christ man you post some terrible shit..

[Kuzzy Powers]

I understand that the cavs would obviously do that, but why would the warriors add 2 more guards while trading brandon wright (no matter how much theyve misused him, hes still a very good prospect) for a less intriguing PF prospect (JJ Hickson).

i kno theyre a team full of guards now, add 2 more and it would be downright razy, especially since CJ Watson will be back with GS

Dont sugar coat it bro.. shit is flat out retarded.

[Kuzzy Powers]

^^ No. it doesnt. Lol @ acquiring talents like Roger Mason and Matt Bonnar for JAX. Just cause it works money wise doesnt mean its a good trade..

[Whatupdoe44]

Dont sugar coat it bro.. shit is flat out retarded.

lol i know it is, as is the spurs one, I personaly doubt the warriors trade jax, but I just didnt feel like getting into it with another cavs/lebron homer.

[Whatupdoe44]

to say its guaranteed really is funny....nothing is guaranteed in the NBA

ask the cavs, remeber when everyone was saying the magic wouldbe lucky to win one game vs them???? they were supposed to run through the east with no problem....they didnt

San Antonio would still have to go through a very tough western conference which would most likely end up in a WCF with the lakers....you think if you add Stephen Jackson to the spurs they are guaranteed to beat thedefending champs???? give me a break

not to mention even if they were to make it past LA then they would have a tough Finals matchup vs whoever takes the east (presumably Boston, Orlando, or The Lebrons)

so YES, there is no guarantee the spurs would be guaranteed a title, even if they did add jackson.

[LC AAU]

Last I checked, there are 240 minutes per team. Tell me, how often would Jackson be playing, filling in for Ginobili, and Jefferson.

Yes, if the Spurs somehow got Jackson, they'd have an incredibly good small lineup (Parker Ginobili, Jefferson, Jackson, Duncan) but that lineup wouldn't get much play time just because small lineups don't usually get that much run. Yes, they'd be deep at the G/F spot, so if Ginobili or Jefferson went down they wouldn't really feel the effects of it very much.

But to say that they would be guaranteed a championship is dumb.

Take into account that the Lakers are the defending champions, and essentially upgraded/stayed the same (remains to be seen.. Probably an upgrade) and all three of the major teams in the East improved. ALSO, you need to take into account that Duncan is older, and is not getting better, and Ginobili is getting up there, and has a history of injuries. Come on man, get out of here with this guaranteed championship shit. You sound like a Laker fan.

The Celtics are winning the championship, right?

[Whatupdoe44]

I'm a Raptors fan.

so you fall under the lebron portion of that comment

[Kuzzy Powers]

why are you guys ripping those trade scenarios and bringing up things like levels of "intrigue" when this team just traded belinelli for devean effing george? nellie will do whatever his ego dictates

The difference is that Marco never made it out of the doghouse, period. Steph lives on top of the doghouse. Huge difference between trading an established player over a guy Nellie prob deemed as wasted potential (which is horseshit).

That being said I wont put anything past Nellie..

[SuperNova854]

Jackson to Clippers for Thornton! We have a 7 mil trade exception. Plus Jackson would love to be reunited with his best bud Baron Davis.