DRAMA!!! Wildcards Top 10 QBs

[Derrville]

Im pretty sure he is. Its the last sentence you wrote that makes you a dumbass and a homer.

[KoRnStARr]

I don't believe anyone outside of a Cowboys fan would argue Romo over Ben, and anyone with a pair of eyes and a brain to process can see Romo gets it done when it matters least.

[Fox1994]

And you guys called me list junk? This dude has Pennington and Palmer top 10.

See question marks. I couldn't think of anyone so I may as well have put Matt Ryan or Hasselbeck there. But, that's really just an excuse for Palmer. Pennington I think is decent. Maybe not top ten, but what the fuck? It doesn't mean anything to me.

[Nukleopatra]

maybe the same way your dumb ass can put romo ahead of ben. get your head out of your ass.

it kills me that you are so hung up on stats and you constantly ignore the only stat that matters... wins.

Well, his argument is that Tony Romo is a better ''passer.'' But then places Drew Brees ahead of Kurt Warner, even though Kurt Warner is clearly the better ''passer.'' I even posted the stats to prove it. He even went as far as using Tony Romo's post third quarter ability, which is impressive, yet has one of the worst post 3rd quarter quarterbacks in the NFL, on his top 5.

This list would have been more acceptable, if not for the god awful analysis.

Wild contradicts himself on a daily basis.

Just once, before I leave this forum, I would like to see a person have the balls to make a top 10 using the same criteria for every quarterback on the list. No half assed excuses for certain guys.

[Nukleopatra]

Look who Warner passes it to. Issac Bruce, Torry Holt, Marshall Faulk, Larry Fitz, Anquan Boldin, Steve Breaston, etc. Compare that to Marques Colston, Lance Moore, etc.

Ahh. I forgot!

Any quarterback can do well with those weapons.

My bad. As retarded as your case is, and even though I could rip through that shit, with little to no effort at all, you did, at least give us a reason. So, thanks.

[Nukleopatra]

Who said that any QB could've done well with those weapons? I'm not taking anything away from Warner, he's borderline HOF if he puts up a decent year this year, but seriously, your hate for Drew Brees is pretty laughable. I mean I know you're probably just being a complete troll looking for responses, but this is just ridiculous lol. I'm sure you think Brad Johnson and Trent Dilfer were also better QB's than Brees


And you can't rip through shit because all you have is completely biased posts about hating Brees.

Brad Johnson had a solid NFL career. He was well above .500, has a superbowl ring, had a .500 postseason record. So, who am I to say he's not better than Drew Brees?

I'll argue in his favor, if that conversation ever comes up. Sure.

[Nukleopatra]

Lmfao. Is he better than Dan Marino too? Dan Fouts?

I'm sure...

Dan Marino's won 143 games.

He also won 8 playoff games, and played in more than both Johnson and Brees combined.

Marino > Brees/Johnson combined.

[Nukleopatra]

But Johnson won a SB and Marino didn't. So obviously by your standards, Johnson >>>>>> Marino

That's if I'm going by superbowls alone, which I'm not. Tony Banks has one, so does Byron Leftwich.

Are you new?

[Archer]

Fixed

When Tom Brady had 3 rings, and Manning had none I think it was still obvious to a lot of people that Manning was still a better QB. Talent wise.

I don't see why people can't look at Drew Brees in a similar fashion towards other QBs. The argument is practically the same.

The argument is not the same at all .... Manning led his team to playoffs after playoffs . 6 straight AFC Souths if I am not mistaken . Drew Brees was 30-28 in SD? seriously? Them San Diego teams had as much if not more talent that the Colts had in the early Manning days . Then he goes to NO , and is still struggling to make the playoffs at all in some seasons nevermind win his own divison . I would also remind you that the Colts run D was WAYYYYYYYYYY worse than anything Brees has ever had to put up with in the sb season , I know they turned it round in the playoffs right? Yeah Manning still took that horrible D to an AFC South title .

How much does Brees need to succeed? Comparing Mannings situation of not winning a sb for a long time to Brees is comical .

At least Manning got his team in position every year .... Drew Brees barely got off the start line in some seasons (see last season)

And if we want to talk talent then it's still a no contest over there careers . Manning is one of the most gifted qbs to enter the NFL in a LONG time ..... three mvps , 10 pro bowls , most tds in a single season record (at one point) , highest season passer rating ever

Either way you try to compare Brees career to Mannings it fails flat on it's face

Edit: Manning td/int 334/166 in the td/int ratio over his career Brees 174/100

[Bear Pand]

Drew Brees almost broke Marino's record for passing yards last season and Manning still got the MVP over him

/argument

[Nukleopatra]

Drew Brees almost broke Marion's record for passing yards last season and Manning still got the MVP over him

/argument

Yeah. But Drew Brees won the Fed-Ex air player of the year award.

Beat that.

[Nukleopatra]

Well, I have him at #8..

and if he doesn't win a playoff game this year, I may replace him with Matt Ryan/Aaron Rodgers..

[Archer]

Obviously I'm talking about starting QB's...



The bold was the part I thought was the funniest. Plus the Saints D has always been a bottom 5 D in the league, and the NFC South has been consistently a top 4 division in the NFL. You're acting like it's an easy task for a QB to do, carry a crappy team to win the AFC South. Without Brees the Saints are a 4 win max team.

Ok now I'm wondering if you even read anything I said...Manning is my #1 QB in the league, I have him above Brees, I'm not arguing that. I'm just saying to have Brees any lower than 3 or 4 is just stupid. Especially at 8. And especially making a case for Brad Johnson over him.

You said why can't Brees be seen as a real top talent without a superbowl like what people thought of Manning . That comes across (wether you mean it or not) as comparing the two situations .

I don't find what is funniest about the Chargers comments . Some of the Chargers teams Brees was on did have as much if not more talent than the early manning Indy teams . I won't argue because I am willing to bet you don't even know who was on them Colts teams . The Colts never had a rush attack like Brees had in SD , they never had a D like he had (apart from the playoffs) . All we had was better o-line and wrs , which people have already said doesn't auto win you games .

Why can Manning win divisions with horrible ds but Brees going .500 is acceptble? Why can Manning take the 3rd worst rush attack in the NFL last season on a 9 game win streak but Brees cant go above .500?

If you think Brees is 8-4/3 in the QB rankings I can see an argument , but comparing his situation to Mannings has no leg to stand on in my opinion .

Sidenote : Nice to see some new blood in the NFL section

Also I am always this much on the attack when Mannings name is mentioned with people I don't find on his level (career wise)

[xCH0Nx]

Either way you try to compare Brees career to Mannings it fails flat on it's face

Does Brees get an award for that sweet mole or birthmark or whatever the fuck that thing on his face is?

[Archer]

Does Brees get an award for that sweet mole or birthmark or whatever the fuck that thing on his face is?

He might ....