Ok, Tell the truth now...
Collapse
X
-
No, he would be a loser just like John Elway would have been if not for Terrell Davis.Comment
-
Ugh. I'm so sick of hearing about Trent Dilfer. I don't think anyone argued that a teams defense didn't help them win. Good TEAMS win the Super Bowl. Period. It's not like basketball where 1 or 2 good guys can sometimes swing the difference completely. Of COURSE a good defense has something to do with winning a Superbowl ring. But to discount guys that played just as big of a part is silly.Comment
-
I totally agree...I'm just saying that in this context I hate that argument because Eli and Big Ben have done more for their teams in victory than Dilfer did (SB XL excluded of course).Comment
-
Tony Banks threw a whopping 0 TDs, and 5 interceptions in the three losses he had as starter. Once Trent Dilfer took over, Baltimore lost 1 game. If you honestly think Tony Banks would have even gotten Baltimore TO the superbowl, you're sadly mistaken.
I know all about Tony Banks - You could send Tony Banks out to pick up superbowl tickets, and he'd find a way to fuck it up.Last edited by Nukleopatra; 09-17-2009, 03:57 PM.Comment
-
LOL.
Tony Banks threw a whopping 0 TDs, and 5 interceptions in the three losses he had as starter. Once Trent Dilfer took over, Baltimore lost 1 game. If you honestly think Tony Banks would have even gotten Baltimore TO the superbowl, you're sadly mistaken.
I know all about Tony Banks - You could send Tony Banks out to pick up superbowl tickets, and he'd find a way to fuck it up.
Tony Banks: 8 tds 8 ints 1573 yds 5-3 recordComment
-
Comment
-
-
Basically, the HC made the wrong decision by replacing him?
Gee, it only lead to a superbowl ring.
I win.Comment
-
You honestly want to sit here and discuss whether or not Tony Banks (black) would have lead the Ravens to the superbowl, after throwing 5 Interceptions and 0 Td passes in the three losses he had as starter?
Basically, the HC made the wrong decision by replacing him?
Gee, it only lead to a superbowl ring.
I win.
But no, im not defending Banks, much, its just Dilfer wasnt all that better if at all than Banks. Plus the defense stepped it up even more in the latter part of the season.Comment
-
But I'm not going to sit here and discuss Tony Banks' career anymore than I already have. I wouldn't toss Tony Banks a dime, if he was a blind man, on the street corner, playing ''Tip toe through the tulips'' on his ukele.
Dilfer > Banks, any day.Last edited by Nukleopatra; 09-17-2009, 04:43 PM.Comment
-
really ?...cowboy fans are easy 2 shut up
Eli, Benji, Brady, Peyton, Dilfer...just flash that superbowl ring any time Romo's name comes up..
or remind him of this...
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yh1DyvTuDA"]YouTube - Romo Singlehandedly Loses the Game![/ame]
Comment
-
Eli, Benji, Brady, Peyton, Dilfer...just flash that superbowl ring any time Romo's name comes up..
or remind him of this...
YouTube - Romo Singlehandedly Loses the Game!
Jus' sayin'.
Comment
-
LOL.
Tony Banks threw a whopping 0 TDs, and 5 interceptions in the three losses he had as starter. Once Trent Dilfer took over, Baltimore lost 1 game. If you honestly think Tony Banks would have even gotten Baltimore TO the superbowl, you're sadly mistaken.
I know all about Tony Banks - You could send Tony Banks out to pick up superbowl tickets, and he'd find a way to fuck it up.
But why'd you bring-up Banks being black? I don't understand that. . . Do you dislike black QBs or something?
Or if he'd ended his season even before that because he was doing something a backup or punter should be doing. . . If he's so valuable, he shouldn't be holding-onto balls for field goals.
Peyton doesn't do it, Brady doesn't do it, even Eli doesn't do it. Just saying.Comment
Comment