-
-
Remember that part of the play in which it was 4th and 12? You think that might have played into the INT part of it, no? I still have no idea why you "corrected" me, but whatever floats your boat. LOL at having Driver open...it needed to be an absolutely perfect throw for Rodgers to get the ball over the short guy, get it to the left of the guy who was on Driver's back, and have the ball get to Driver while he was still in-bounds.
You make it sound like Earl Morrall missing Jimmy Orr in SB III.Comment
-
4th and 12 is a pressure situation, something he struggles with. All Rodgers needed to do was lead Driver toward the out of bounds line. Driver had plenty of room to get 3-4 feet in. Rodgers overthrew him and he admitted it was a bad pass. When you have a sure handed receiver, you need to give him a reasonable chance to catch the ball when he is open, something Rodgers didn't do.
Comment
-
Do you understand how football works? If you don't convert on 4th down, the other team gets the ball. So a sack or an incompletion is just as bad as an interception. A QB isn't going to take a sack or throw the ball away. He is going to risk an INT.
As I asked you in the other thread, do you have any proof of Rodgers always struggling in pressure situations? He seemed to do pretty well on that 3rd and goal in the 4th quarter, no?
LOL at Rodgers admitting it was a bad pass. His pass hit off Driver's hands (did you even see the play?), was tipped into the air, and returned for a TD. What the hell do you expect Rodgers to say? "I made a great pass"? "Driver should have caught it"?
In sum: What is your point?Comment
-
I'm really starting to question whether or not you've seen the play. He had ample time, and threw it above and behind driver who tried to make a miraculous catch. No one is talking about Rodgers taking a sack or throwing the ball away. The bottom line is he had a receiver open, had ample time to throw it to him, and he missed him. Had he made the throw, the Packers would have had the ball in a position where they only needed 30ish yards to give Crosby a decent shot at the game tying field goal. There would have been about 38ish seconds left, which is plenty of time.Last edited by Primetime; 11-09-2009, 03:11 PM.Comment
-
Do you understand why Rodgers had to throw the ball high? Because there was a Buc player playing his zone, standing in front of Driver.
Do you understand why he had to throw it behind Driver? Because Driver was coming up on the sideline, and since Rodgers had to throw the ball high to get the ball over the Bucs player playing zone, a high pass that led Driver would have taken Driver out of bounds.
Again, have you seen the play? It would have taken a perfect throw from Rodgers to complete that pass. Rodgers did not make a perfect throw. The game was over.
As for your other erroneous comments, the Packers still needed a few more completions just to get to the top Crosby's FG range (47 yards), and last I checked the Bucs were up 31-28...so I guess Crosby's game-winning FG would have been like Steve McNair's game-winning TD pass to Kevin Dyson in the Super Bowl.
In sum: What is your point?Comment
-
The man playing underneath in the zone had a better shot at catching the ball than if Rodgers would have thrown it correctly. If Rodgers leads Driver, the zone player is completely out of the play either way. Driver could have caught the ball and even cut up field for a few yards extra. A well thrown ball would have had Driver get the ball 2-3 yards in bounds. The out of bounds line should have had little factor into his decision making when throwing the ball.
You're crazy to think Crosby's range tops off at 47 yards. He has questionably the most powerful leg in the entire NFL. Is he accurate from 60 yards, no. He's not even accurate from 47 yards, but it still gives Green Bay a chance. I meant game-tying by the way, not game winning.Comment
-
Thats nice. Again, what is your point with all of this? It appears to me that its Rodgers made a bad throw and should be blamed for the loss. Is my assumption correct?
What are you arguing? Crosby's career long is only 53, and he hits less than half of his 50+ FGs. I would say that 47 yards is the tip of Crosby's range where you would expect him to make it more often than not. Anything outside of that is a crapshoot.Comment
-
I never said anything about him making it more often than not. Putting the ball on the 40 yard line gives Crosby at 57 yard attempt, something he is capable of making with the strength of his leg. It's all about giving your team the opportunity to win. If Rodgers had done this and Crosby missed, no one would be talking about how shitty of a pass it was, and how Rodgers, yet again, failed to give his team the chance to win in a pressure situation.Comment
-
You're saying Driver wasn't open and Rodgers needed to make a PERFECT pass. It was a simple pass and catch that Rodgers missed.
I never said anything about him making it more often than not. Putting the ball on the 40 yard line gives Crosby at 57 yard attempt, something he is capable of making with the strength of his leg. It's all about giving your team the opportunity to win. If Rodgers had done this and Crosby missed, no one would be talking about how shitty of a pass it was, and how Rodgers, yet again, failed to give his team the chance to win in a pressure situation.Comment
-
Of course they wouldn't! And hopefully they wouldn't be blaming Crosby for missing a 57-yard FG. They'd be blaming the woeful performance of the special teams and a defense that took their foot off the pedal in the 4th quarter and allowed Josh Freeman to rally his team to victory.
Oh wait...Comment
-
No one is disagreeing with the fact that the loss should not be placed on Rodgers. Everyone knows it was the special teams and defense. I'm simply stating that, once again, Rodgers was not able to be a leader and step up when it's most important. Instead, he made a terrible pass that should have been a fairly simple completion, especially with a sure-handed Driver.Comment
Tweet
Comment