USC Without Reggie Bush

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Fox1994
    Posts too much
    • Dec 2008
    • 5327

    USC Without Reggie Bush

    I have sand in my vag because of the NCAA sanctions. I'm not gonna bullshit like we didn't deserve to lose what we've lost (10 scholarships for the next three years, postseason play for the next two, two 2004 and all 2005 wins). So I'm going to ask, do any of you think we could've been as successful without Reggie Bush?

    Could Matthew Stephen Leinart have been a two-time Heisman winner? Would he have needed to?

    Could LenDale have carried the lion's share? Or would Desmond Reed and Chauncey Washington have been able to be bigger helps?

    Do you think USC would have been a capable team in from 2003 to 2005 without Reggie Bush? More than capable, do you think they would have been able to compete for the National Championship?
  • USCChifan
    All-Star
    • Oct 2009
    • 1172

    #2
    No
    Reggie Bush was a game-changing player that was threat to score anytime he touched the ball. Whether that be running, receiving, or returning punts and kicks.
    You think they win this game w/o Bush?
    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=weu3ShNvyvE"]YouTube- USC vs. Notre Dame 2005 Final Drive[/ame]

    Comment

    • KNUBB
      WHITE RONDO
      • Jun 2009
      • 7973

      #3
      Originally posted by Fox1994
      I have sand in my vag because of the NCAA sanctions. I'm not gonna bullshit like we didn't deserve to lose what we've lost (10 scholarships for the next three years, postseason play for the next two, two 2004 and all 2005 wins). So I'm going to ask, do any of you think we could've been as successful without Reggie Bush?

      Could Matthew Stephen Leinart have been a two-time Heisman winner? Would he have needed to?

      Could LenDale have carried the lion's share? Or would Desmond Reed and Chauncey Washington have been able to be bigger helps?

      Do you think USC would have been a capable team in from 2003 to 2005 without Reggie Bush? More than capable, do you think they would have been able to compete for the National Championship?
      2003 is a fallacy. That championship belongs to LSU






      Comment

      • Epidemik
        Commitment to Excellence
        • Jul 2009
        • 10276

        #4
        Originally posted by USCChifan
        No
        Reggie Bush was a game-changing player that was threat to score anytime he touched the ball. Whether that be running, receiving, or returning punts and kicks.
        You think they win this game w/o Bush?
        YouTube- USC vs. Notre Dame 2005 Final Drive
        I remember that game

        :rockwoot:

         

        Comment

        • USCChifan
          All-Star
          • Oct 2009
          • 1172

          #5
          Originally posted by Epidemik26
          I remember that game

          :rockwoot:
          I know Notre Dame fans that still have sand in their vaginas over that game

          Comment

          • Fox1994
            Posts too much
            • Dec 2008
            • 5327

            #6
            Ya, but people act as if there was no other talent on the roster. USC always has seemingly a hundred and one backs. And we had plenty just sitting there while Reggie was doing what he was.

            So if he wasn't there, then would we just not have been even near the same team?

            Comment

            • USCChifan
              All-Star
              • Oct 2009
              • 1172

              #7
              Originally posted by Fox1994
              Ya, but people act as if there was no other talent on the roster. USC always has seemingly a hundred and one backs. And we had plenty just sitting there while Reggie was doing what he was.

              So if he wasn't there, then would we just not have been even near the same team?
              Don't get me wrong, Leinart, Jarrett, LenDale, and the uber-talented defense were a major part in their championship run, but w/o Bush they don't go to the Rose Bowl and IMO I really doubt LenDale would've been the touchdown vulture that he was w/o Bush. While USC always does have a ton of RBs, I don't think a trio of LenDale, Desmond Reed, and Chauncey Washington would've been as effective and game-changing as Bush was for USC

              Comment

              • G-men
                Posts too much
                • Nov 2011
                • 7579

                #8
                Originally posted by JayRock
                The Bush Push never happened. We won that game so fuck yo couches!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
                :fuckyocouch:

                Comment

                • FirstTimer
                  Freeman Error

                  • Feb 2009
                  • 18729

                  #9
                  Originally posted by USCChifan
                  I know Notre Dame fans that still have sand in their vaginas over that game
                  I personally don't. If Ambrose Wooden turns his head on that 4th down pass the game is over. Instead it was a long completion.

                  Comment

                  • G-men
                    Posts too much
                    • Nov 2011
                    • 7579

                    #10
                    Originally posted by FirstTimer
                    I personally don't. If Ambrose Wooden turns his head on that 4th down pass the game is over. Instead it was a long completion.
                    yeah the receiver was in no position to catch that ball, the DB just missed the play

                    Comment

                    • DJ Fog
                      Posts a lot
                      • Dec 2008
                      • 3634

                      #11
                      Originally posted by USCChifan
                      No
                      Reggie Bush was a game-changing player that was threat to score anytime he touched the ball. Whether that be running, receiving, or returning punts and kicks.
                      You think they win this game w/o Bush?
                      YouTube- USC vs. Notre Dame 2005 Final Drive
                      From what I understand Bush even conducted the orchestra that's playing in that highlight film
                      www.soundcloud.com/djfog86

                      Comment

                      • Youk
                        Posts too much
                        • Feb 2009
                        • 7998

                        #12
                        The Bush Push.

                        It happened.

                        Comment

                        • Fox1994
                          Posts too much
                          • Dec 2008
                          • 5327

                          #13
                          I see. So, the Bush Push. That's definitely a good argument in and of itself.

                          Okay, okay, okay. So if Reggie wasn't there, how would the team have finished the 2004 and 2005 seasons? It's not like they would've gone 7-5 or some shit. It's still a very talented team. Any hindsight projections for what could've happened if Reggie weren't there?

                          Comment

                          • Gonzo
                            Colts Supremicist
                            • Dec 2008
                            • 5325

                            #14
                            I don't know what kind of answer you're looking for here honestly.

                            Bush was an integral part of the offense, and more importantly, drew a lot of cover and recognition in the backfield. I'm under no allusions that USC would have been better without Bush, but they wouldn't have been horrifically off-mark.

                            Dumb Topic = Dumb Answers

                            Comment

                            • Fox1994
                              Posts too much
                              • Dec 2008
                              • 5327

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Gonzo
                              I don't know what kind of answer you're looking for here honestly.

                              Bush was an integral part of the offense, and more importantly, drew a lot of cover and recognition in the backfield. I'm under no allusions that USC would have been better without Bush, but they wouldn't have been horrifically off-mark.

                              Dumb Topic = Dumb Answers
                              Idk. I'm tryna provoke discussion. I'm bored.

                              Comment

                              Working...