I have sand in my vag because of the NCAA sanctions. I'm not gonna bullshit like we didn't deserve to lose what we've lost (10 scholarships for the next three years, postseason play for the next two, two 2004 and all 2005 wins). So I'm going to ask, do any of you think we could've been as successful without Reggie Bush?
Could Matthew Stephen Leinart have been a two-time Heisman winner? Would he have needed to?
Could LenDale have carried the lion's share? Or would Desmond Reed and Chauncey Washington have been able to be bigger helps?
Do you think USC would have been a capable team in from 2003 to 2005 without Reggie Bush? More than capable, do you think they would have been able to compete for the National Championship?
Could Matthew Stephen Leinart have been a two-time Heisman winner? Would he have needed to?
Could LenDale have carried the lion's share? Or would Desmond Reed and Chauncey Washington have been able to be bigger helps?
Do you think USC would have been a capable team in from 2003 to 2005 without Reggie Bush? More than capable, do you think they would have been able to compete for the National Championship?
Comment