Boise State hypocritical in not wanting to play Idaho

[Atlas]

Basic principals being the same are not "mirror images" because not everything is the same.

Unless of course when you look in the mirror you're missing an ear that you actually have or perhaps have an extra eye that you don't have.

the basic principles of their offenses were mirror images... still dont know how this is going over your head...

Basic principals being the same =/= to being a "mirror image".

arguing semantics again, keep on riding the failboat...

Yes you did.

Mirror image. You said it. You used it.

Sucks to be you.

read above, and you even suck ass at arguing semantics... even still, you arent even arguing against what i am arguing for, you are arguing the way i worded it... fail... im starting to think you are still in high school, which would explain so very much...

Yeah after you backpedaled when I called you out on your idiotic assertion the two teams were "mirror images"...yet one was much better than the other....which would immedietly make them not mirror images.


Except you admitted the QB was better. And the WR's talent developed and got better as well.

Nice try on backpedaling again.

i still dont understand how you think clarifying something for someone who clearly cant comprehend basic football precepts is backpedaling... keep arguing semantics, b/c it is clearly all you can argue... football knowledge eludes you, which i guess explains why you are a ND fan (ZOMG I DIDNT TYPE AN!!!)...

[FirstTimer]

the basic principles of their offenses were mirror images... still dont know how this is going over your head...

It's not and never was.

You said the 2008 and 2009 Alabama were mirror images of eachother.

You got called out.

You backpedaled.

*claps*

football knowledge eludes you

Ok sugarplum.

[Atlas]

It's not and never was.

You said the 2008 and 2009 Alabama were mirror images of eachother.

You got called out.

You backpedaled.

*claps*

you still cant understand my argument... i seriously hope you dont procreate... however, kudos on proving darwin wrong...

[FirstTimer]

you still cant understand my argument

No. I understood it fine.

You were wrong.

Congrats.

i seriously hope you dont procreate

How do you think you got here? :acid:

[Atlas]

No. I understood it fine.

You were wrong.

Congrats.


How do you think you I got here? :acid:

you got here by procreating??? interesting... and it is easy to see you didnt understand one iota of my argument b/c you keep harping on your dumbass interpretation of it... your interpretation was wrong, my argument was correct... :bounce:

[FirstTimer]

you got here by procreating???

................

You are a special kind of retarded.

and it is easy to see you didnt understand one iota of my argument b/c you keep harping on your dumbass interpretation of it... your interpretation was wrong, my argument was correct... :bounce:

You argument was wrong.

You got called out..then changed it.

[Atlas]

You argument was wrong.

You got called out..then changed it.

i stuck to my guns while you argued something that Archer brought up... coherency eluded you so you argue semantics... double fail on your part... god damn you are a whole new kind of stupid... i wish you had stayed on TGL with the rest of those fagtards that know nothing about football...

[FirstTimer]

i stuck to my guns

Water pistols....

coherency eluded you so you argue semantics

SOS, regardless of who brought it up, was instantly relevant as soon as you mentioned "body of work" with no qualifiers attached to it. You got called out on it then changed it to "Top 25 teams" a few posts later.

[Atlas]

Water pistols....


SOS, regardless of who brought it up, was instantly relevant as soon as you mentioned "body of work" with no qualifiers attached to it. You got called out on it then changed it to "Top 25 teams" a few posts later.

jesus fucking christ... i addressed this like 50 posts ago... again, any sane person would assume i was talking about how they played against the top teams, b/c thats all the matters... so i clarified it for the less intelligent people (you), but apparently that equates to backpedaling... interesting thought process you have there... please though, keep harping on this issue, b/c it makes you look like more and more of a retard... i pray for our future if you represent a microcosm of our youth... :obama:

[FirstTimer]

again, any sane person would assume i was talking about how they played against the top teams

No.

Body of work=entire body of work.

b/c thats all the matters

Obviously not because the way they play against the teams that aren't top teams matters as well. If they don't play well in those games and lose then that obviously matters.

So no, top teams aren't the only games that matter.

[Atlas]

No.

Body of work=entire body of work.

in your batshit crazy mind, yes... in my argument, no, which has been clarified countless times...

Obviously not because the way they play against the teams that aren't top teams matters as well. If they don't play well in those games and lose then that obviously matters.

So no, top teams aren't the only games that matter.

most people, like the poll voters, care more about how they did against top teams rather than how they did against the likes of Vandy or Colorado State...

[FirstTimer]

in your batshit crazy mind, yes... in my argument,

In your original argument, yes.

Until you added a qualifier and thus backpedaled.

most people, like the poll voters, care [b]more[b] about how they did against top teams rather than how they did against the likes of Vandy or Colorado State...

But that doesn't mean those games don't matter at all. They do. You just admitted it. I never said they mattered "equally" in the grand scheme of things but those games results obviously matter. They still count towards the teams record and thus still matter. So obviously games against "top teams" aren't "all that matters".

[Atlas]

In your original argument, yes.

Until you added a qualifier and thus backpedaled.

the qualifier was added b/c you veered off into left field about it... not my fault you didnt understand my argument til i clarified it for you...

But that doesn't mean those games don't matter at all. They do. You just admitted it. I never said they mattered "equally" in the grand scheme of things but those games results obviously matter. They still count towards the teams record and thus still matter. So obviously games against "top teams" aren't "all that matters".

games against top teams have a greater bearing on how good the voters perceive the team to be... they are expected to beat the shitty teams, ipso facto, they matter less...

[FirstTimer]

the qualifier was added b/c you veered off into left field about it

No. I took you at your word.

games against top teams have a greater bearing on how good the voters perceive the team to be

Yep.

.

they are expected to beat the shitty teams, ipso facto, they matter less...

I never said they didn't matter less.


You said games against top teams are "all that matters". "Ipso facto" the games against non top teams wouldn't matter at all. Which isn't true. They obviously matter. And they obviously matter less. But they still matter(which is all I said, I never said to what degree they matter, just that they did matter.) But that's not what you said or what was implied by your original statement.

[Atlas]

No. I took you at your word.


Yep.

.

I never said they didn't matter less.


You said games against top teams are "all that matters". "Ipso facto" the games against non top teams wouldn't matter at all. Which isn't true. They obviously matter. And they obviously matter less. But they still matter(which is all I said, I never said to what degree they matter, just that they did matter.) But that's not what you said or what was implied by your original statement.

i have said countless times that it was implied... you make me