NFL's Top 100 Discussion

[Warner2BruceTD]

Not even close. This is the only question I have. What I'm saying is they both have had only 1 good season. You are saying Freeman needs to produce another good season for you to accept he's a top 100 player. By that same logic in McFadden's case, doesn't he need another good season for you to accept him as a top 100 player? Why or why not, please.

I defended my stance on this earlier, and I suspect his answer would be similar.

[Shayn•Da•Pain]

I defended my stance on this earlier, and I suspect his answer would be similar.

Prove it.

[Senser81]

Im sorry but you have to be a fucking idiot to think that McFadden had a better year than Freeman.

A FUCKING IDIOT!

"Let me put it this way. Have you ever heard of Plato, Aristotle, Socrates? Morons."

[Senser81]

Not even close. This is the only question I have. What I'm saying is they both have had only 1 good season. You are saying Freeman needs to produce another good season for you to accept he's a top 100 player. By that same logic in McFadden's case, doesn't he need another good season for you to accept him as a top 100 player? Why or why not, please.

Why do you keep focusing on the wrong things, and why do you keep claiming that all good seasons are identical?

I don't remember saying Freeman needs to produce another good season for me to accept he's a top 100 player. If I did, please provide quote because I don't want to have to sift through the trainwreck of this thread.

Either way, I WILL respond to you, simply because you've made the same mistake 6 times in a row. McFadden doesn't need another good season because his 2010 season was one of the top 100 in the NFL. Freeman's 2010 ten season was nice, but it wasn't one of the top 100.

[Shayn•Da•Pain]

Why do you keep focusing on the wrong things, and why do you keep claiming that all good seasons are identical?

I don't remember saying Freeman needs to produce another good season for me to accept he's a top 100 player. If I did, please provide quote because I don't want to have to sift through the trainwreck of this thread.

Either way, I WILL respond to you, simply because you've made the same mistake 6 times in a row. McFadden doesn't need another good season because his 2010 season was one of the top 100 in the NFL. Freeman's 2010 ten season was nice, but it wasn't one of the top 100.

More opinion based bullshit. You have no proof to support your claim.

[BigBucs]

You spewing so much bullshit you dont even remember half of it.

Why do you keep focusing on the wrong things, and why do you keep claiming that all good seasons are identical?

I don't remember saying Freeman needs to produce another good season for me to accept he's a top 100 player. If I did, please provide quote because I don't want to have to sift through the trainwreck of this thread.

Either way, I WILL respond to you, simply because you've made the same mistake 6 times in a row. McFadden doesn't need another good season because his 2010 season was one of the top 100 in the NFL. Freeman's 2010 ten season was nice, but it wasn't one of the top 100.

Again, 1600 total yards rushing and receiving along with 10 TDs trumps 3800 yards passing and rushing along with 25 TDs? Im fucking done.

No, those were two different arguments. I asked if it was just based on last year, or if it was career-related. McFadden over Owens based on last year is a no-brainer, except, of course, to you. I think Freeman over Owens based on last year is also a no-brainer, FWIW.

Its funny, because I actually liked Freeman last year. I thought he'd be a bust when he was drafted, and he's really surprised me. He looked poised when I saw him play. I'm just not ready to say he's a top 100 player yet. If he has another 25 TD 6 INT year next season, then perhaps.

[Warner2BruceTD]

More opinion based bullshit. You have no proof to support your claim.

The entire basis of this list, and the entire crux of this debate, is OPINION BASED BULLSHIT!

I ask again, in all seriousness...

What is wrong with you?

[Hasselbeck]

Yea, Im completely out of touch with reality.

About time you admitted it.

[SHOGUN]

Antrel fucking Rolle is rated higher than Mario Williams.

:rolling:

[Bear Pand]

Don't care for this at all.

Better list:

101-81: http://www.profootballfocus.com/blog...-no-101-no-81/

80-61: http://www.profootballfocus.com/blog...2%80%93-no-61/



60-41: http://www.profootballfocus.com/blog...2%80%93-no-41/

Don't know if it's been brought up yet, but I just looked at this list and the top 10 were:

1. Aaron Rodgers
2. Justin Smith
3. Kyle Williams
4. Trent Cole
5. Brandon Lloyd
6. Charles Johnson
7. Jamaal Charles
8. Matt Ryan
9. Tamba Hali
10. James Harrison

hmmm

[Aso]

Don't know if it's been brought up yet, but I just looked at this list and the top 10 were:

1. Aaron Rodgers
2. Justin Smith
3. Kyle Williams
4. Trent Cole
5. Brandon Lloyd
6. Charles Johnson
7. Jamaal Charles
8. Matt Ryan
9. Tamba Hali
10. James Harrison

hmmm

Yep, all based off of 2010. If you paid attention to their site you'd see why the list is how it is. But thats just one person on that sites opinion. Matt Ryan won the "PFF MVP" and he's #8 there.

[Blick]

2 more Chiefs on the list...Brian Waters at 67 and Tamba Hali at 64.

Waters shouldn't be on the list. He got the veteran respect vote.

Hali is definitely deserving.

[Bear Pand]

Yep, all based off of 2010. If you paid attention to their site you'd see why the list is how it is. But thats just one person on that sites opinion. Matt Ryan won the "PFF MVP" and he's #8 there.

My point is that lists like this aren't all that interesting. This list actually applies more to fantasy football than real football.

I mean you put Brandon Lloyd at #5 then in the description say "he isn't the best WR in the NFL." :shot: It's like they're trying to be objective and stat based to the point it messes up the list. Just trying to be different to be different.

It's funny because they criticize this NFL list, but then go out and make one that's probably worse. Rank the best 100 players or GTFO.

[ram29jackson]

Thanks for the info.

youre welcome hah

then why do you have a long thread for a pointless list ?

[Aso]

My point is that lists like this aren't all that interesting. This list actually applies more to fantasy football than real football.

I mean you put Brandon Lloyd at #5 then in the description say "he isn't the best WR in the NFL." :shot: It's like they're trying to be objective and stat based to the point it messes up the list. Just trying to be different to be different.

It's funny because they criticize this NFL list, but then go out and make one that's probably worse. Rank the best 100 players or GTFO.

Well they base players off of the past season and they have a million different things and seasons on why. You should see their case for why they think Brady isn't as good as everyone else thinks he is.

Like a lot of people would probably include Jared Allen on this list, no? Well he was absolutely terrible last year. They also try and give credit to players no one sees. Brandon Lloyd could very well disappear next year and they'll be down talking him as they should.

Also they aren't entirely stat based. They do provide a lot of stats other places don't at all. But their grades end up being the final saying on their terms. And they'd more often than not just compare their grades when comparing players than stats.

They are different though and not affiliated with the NFL. For that I think they will always receive a lot of criticism. When looking at who's better between players, raw stats never tell the whole story. On PFF you can look at more in depth stats, or just look at their grades. You can have either or.