Official Seattle Seahawks Forum Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • steeljake
    6 rings...
    • Oct 2008
    • 8752

    #46
    i dont see how seattle can passon crabtree honestly. with the 26 wr's that went on IR last year they need him badly. In truth I was sure they would at least talk to TJ Whoseurmomma, no way the cards will trade boldin to them for less than 10 1st round draft picks. Maybe even 85 could go there.


    23:33 OnlyOneBeerLeft: jake nobody listens to you aint you supposed to die from cancer or somethin soon?

    Comment

    • Hasselbeck
      Jus' bout dat action boss
      • Feb 2009
      • 6175

      #47
      Originally posted by steeljake75
      i dont see how seattle can passon crabtree honestly. with the 26 wr's that went on IR last year they need him badly. In truth I was sure they would at least talk to TJ Whoseurmomma, no way the cards will trade boldin to them for less than 10 1st round draft picks. Maybe even 85 could go there.
      My biggest thing with Housh is.. he has always been in Ocho Cinco's shadow.. even in college. I just wonder how much of his production was him and how much was him facing single coverage when Chad had double coverage most of the time.

      I like Housh a lot.. but just believe he would be better off if he were paired with a home run threat. He's more of a possession receiver now.
      Originally posted by ram29jackson
      I already said months ago that Seattle wasn't winning any SB

      Comment

      • Aso
        The Serious House
        • Nov 2008
        • 11137

        #48
        Ok, i know this might sound ludicrous but am i the only one that thinks Seneca Wallace has a chance to beat out Matt Hasselbeck for the starting quarterback job? Here come the statistics.

        Matt Hasselbeck: 5tds - 10ints, 52%, 1-6 as starter in 2008, Got sacked 19 times in 7 games.

        Seneca Wallace: 11tds - 3ints, 58%, 3-5 as starter in 2008, Got sacked 14 times in 8 games.

        So? Not saying that he will but he seems that he has a legit chance he could.

        Comment

        • PNovak
          No longer a noob
          • Dec 2008
          • 1941

          #49
          Simple answer. No.
          I LOVE VSN

          Comment

          • Aso
            The Serious House
            • Nov 2008
            • 11137

            #50
            Hasselbeck is on the decline. Wallace is on the rise. Wallace is not suited to be a starter but I'm not sure that Hasselbeck is a starter anymore either. The Seahawks are lucky they play in the NFC West.

            Comment

            • Hasselbeck
              Jus' bout dat action boss
              • Feb 2009
              • 6175

              #51
              Originally posted by Aso21Raiders
              Ok, i know this might sound ludicrous but am i the only one that thinks Seneca Wallace has a chance to beat out Matt Hasselbeck for the starting quarterback job? Here come the statistics.

              Matt Hasselbeck: 5tds - 10ints, 52%, 1-6 as starter in 2008, Got sacked 19 times in 7 games.

              Seneca Wallace: 11tds - 3ints, 58%, 3-5 as starter in 2008, Got sacked 14 times in 8 games.

              So? Not saying that he will but he seems that he has a legit chance he could.
              If Hasselbeck is healthy. There is no debate. He's the guy. When he is healthy there are few in the NFC better than him.

              The problem is, the weapons around him have quickly deteriorated. Shaun Alexander's shelf life hit the shitter in 2 years after the Super Bowl run. Bobby Engram was hurt most of the last two years. Deion Branch was hurt most of the last two years. Nate Burleson just blew his knee. The interior of our line is a train wreck.. and even Walter Jones was hurt most of the season.

              I still believe Hass has at least 3 years of good play left in him. It all depends on who we can surround him with.

              And I am sorry.. Seneca Wallace is not a starting QB at this level. Solid backup yes. Starter no. His numbers were very inflated when you break them down game by game..
              Originally posted by ram29jackson
              I already said months ago that Seattle wasn't winning any SB

              Comment

              • PNovak
                No longer a noob
                • Dec 2008
                • 1941

                #52
                Hasselbeck will be a Pro Bowl caliber QB for the next 3 years. When he is healthy, he has the ability to put the team on his shoulders and carry them. I expect him to come back healthy this upcoming season and with a new WR threat or O-lineman the Seahawks should be back on top of the NFC West.

                The only way the Cardinals will be a threat is if Warner signs with them and so does Boldin. Fitz will get double covered even more then and Breaston won't be as open as the 2nd WR.
                I LOVE VSN

                Comment

                • Aso
                  The Serious House
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 11137

                  #53
                  I don't think Hasselbeck is as good as you two think.

                  Comment

                  • Hasselbeck
                    Jus' bout dat action boss
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 6175

                    #54
                    Originally posted by Nick
                    It'll be interesting to see how it all plays out for the 'Hawks. Conventional wisdom had them taking Crabtree for a long time, and even with his recent news, they still very well could. But with the injuries that have plagued Seattle's receiving corps last season, do they want to spend Top Five money on a receiver who played through two injuries last season and will need surgery to correct one? If one of the top two tackles is on the board for the Seahawks (Monroe or Smith), they might be tempted to go that way and invest in a WR later, especially if they want their offense to be geared more towards the run (which I thought I read that's the case).
                    It's hard to say.. Knapp was more conservative in Oakland and Atlanta because he was working with young QB's that were still learning the West Coast offense.. and you could argue that in both situations.. those teams had better talent for the run game than for a passing offense.

                    It's definitely not going to be mistaken for Holmgren's play calling, but I believe Knapp will throw it more than typically does.. if only because our running game is not good.
                    Originally posted by ram29jackson
                    I already said months ago that Seattle wasn't winning any SB

                    Comment

                    • Hasselbeck
                      Jus' bout dat action boss
                      • Feb 2009
                      • 6175

                      #55
                      Originally posted by Aso21Raiders
                      I don't think Hasselbeck is as good as you two think.
                      That's fine.. I don't think Seneca Wallace is as good as you think he is apparently.
                      Originally posted by ram29jackson
                      I already said months ago that Seattle wasn't winning any SB

                      Comment

                      • Aso
                        The Serious House
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 11137

                        #56
                        I don't think seneca is that good

                        Comment

                        • Hasselbeck
                          Jus' bout dat action boss
                          • Feb 2009
                          • 6175

                          #57
                          Originally posted by Aso21Raiders
                          I don't think seneca is that good
                          Well at least we agree on something.

                          All I know is.. a healthy Hasselbeck in 2007 = nearly 4000 yards and 28 TD
                          An unhealthy Hasselbeck with no one to throw the ball to = worst season as a starter.

                          If he's healthy, he's fine.
                          Originally posted by ram29jackson
                          I already said months ago that Seattle wasn't winning any SB

                          Comment

                          • PNovak
                            No longer a noob
                            • Dec 2008
                            • 1941

                            #58
                            After looking at Matt's stats over his career, the only knock on the guy I see is that his completion percentage could be better. You have to realize though that the Hawks were one of the worst teams when it came to WR drops. If some of those were caught I'm sure his Comp% goes up 2-4%. Like in 2005.
                            I LOVE VSN

                            Comment

                            • Aso
                              The Serious House
                              • Nov 2008
                              • 11137

                              #59
                              Just wanted to post the seahawks injuries. I think its quite something incredible. These are the amount of games the players on the Seahawks offense missed.

                              Hasselbeck - 9 games
                              Julius Jones - 1
                              Maurice Morris - 3
                              Deion Branch - 8
                              Nate Burleson - 15
                              Bobby Engram - 3
                              Walter Jones - 4
                              Rob Sims - 15
                              Mike Wahle - 6
                              Sean Locklear - 10
                              Last edited by Aso; 02-22-2009, 07:21 PM.

                              Comment

                              • Hasselbeck
                                Jus' bout dat action boss
                                • Feb 2009
                                • 6175

                                #60
                                Originally posted by Aso21Raiders
                                Just wanted to post the seahawks injuries. I think its quite something incredible. These are the amount of games the players on the Seahawks offense missed.

                                Hasselbeck - 9 games
                                Julius Jones - 1
                                Maurice Morris - 3
                                Deion Branch - 8
                                Nate Burleson - 15
                                Bobby Engram - 3
                                Walter Jones - 4
                                Rob Sims - 15
                                Mike Wahle - 6
                                Sean Locklear - 10
                                Well hell.. against the Niners and Rams we were down to our 7th and 8th string WR's. So yeah.. it was one of the strangest seasons I have ever seen in my life.

                                Having John Marshall call the defense was also like having a root canal minus the Novocain by the way. So enjoy that in 2009.
                                Originally posted by ram29jackson
                                I already said months ago that Seattle wasn't winning any SB

                                Comment

                                Working...