USC loses sanctions appeal

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • FirstTimer
    Freeman Error

    • Feb 2009
    • 18729

    USC loses sanctions appeal



    Southern California's appeal of penalties from the Reggie Bush case has been denied, according to multiple reports.

    CAPTION
    By Eugene Tanner, AP
    The football program was banned from the postseason for two seasons and had 30 scholarships cut during a three-year period because the NCAA ruled Bush received impermissible benefits.

    According to The Los Angeles Times, which cited several people familiar with the appeal, those penalties were upheld. Bryan Fischer of CBSSports.com also confirmed the news.

    The Trojans sat out a bowl game in 2010 but have not instituted the scholarship ban.

    USC coach Lane Kiffin signed a full recruiting class last February, which will push those penalties to start in 2012.

    The decision would mean the school will not be eligible for a bowl game in 2011 and cannot play in the initial Pac-12 championship game.

    It also opens the door for the Bowl Championship Series to strip the school of its national championship in 2004 because of Bush's participation that season.

    "(The BCS presidential oversight committee) will act when we learn something officially from the NCAA," BCS executive Bill Hancock told USA TODAY.

    USC had filed its appeal after the decision was handed down in June 2010. The school made its case to the NCAA in January.

    "All I will say is that I want to thank the NCAA for giving us an opportunity before the appeals committee to have a good and fair hearing," school President Max Nikias said at the appeal hearing in January. "Now we have to wait for the ruling."

    MORE: Follow Erick Smith on Twitter

    See photos of: University of Southern California Trojans, Reggie Bush, NCAA, Lane Kiffin
  • Hasselbeck
    Jus' bout dat action boss
    • Feb 2009
    • 6175

    #2
    The NCAA is such a joke
    Originally posted by ram29jackson
    I already said months ago that Seattle wasn't winning any SB

    Comment

    • Bigpapa42
      Junior Member
      • Feb 2009
      • 3185

      #3
      I really still don't get the harshness of the penalties they imposed. If they could somehow prove institutional knowledge, it would seem at least somewhat appropriate. This wasn't a dirty program giving extra benefits to a bunch of players... This was one player taking stuff from an agent and working to hide it.

      The NCAA needs to smash the shit out of Ohio State to make the system seem even remotely equitable.

      Comment

      • FirstTimer
        Freeman Error

        • Feb 2009
        • 18729

        #4
        Originally posted by Bigpapa42
        I really still don't get the harshness of the penalties they imposed. If they could somehow prove institutional knowledge, it would seem at least somewhat appropriate. This wasn't a dirty program giving extra benefits to a bunch of players... This was one player taking stuff from an agent and working to hide it.

        The NCAA needs to smash the shit out of Ohio State to make the system seem even remotely equitable.
        I think the NCAA found the entire program was a mess and was a cesspool. Agents and celbs at practice etc. USC ran really loose and got bit in the ass. Then they were REALLY uncooperative and lied to investigators etc.

        I agree OhST needs to get smacked down

        Comment

        • Bigpapa42
          Junior Member
          • Feb 2009
          • 3185

          #5
          Originally posted by FirstTimer
          I think the NCAA found the entire program was a mess and was a cesspool. Agents and celbs at practice etc. USC ran really loose and got bit in the ass. Then they were REALLY uncooperative and lied to investigators etc.

          I agree OhST needs to get smacked down
          But they couldn't prove any other violations. That's what I have a problem with. I'm not naive enough to believe that USC was otherwise squeaky clean, but I have a problem considering them a really dirty program when a two year investigation turned up one actual issue.

          Comment

          • FirstTimer
            Freeman Error

            • Feb 2009
            • 18729

            #6
            Originally posted by Bigpapa42
            But they couldn't prove any other violations. That's what I have a problem with. I'm not naive enough to believe that USC was otherwise squeaky clean, but I have a problem considering them a really dirty program when a two year investigation turned up one actual issue.
            I don't think they needed to.

            Bush took gifts worth hundreds of thousands of dollars right under USC's noses. Carrol and USC and Bush stonewalled at every turn and was less than cooperative.

            Comment

            Working...