Ravens Trade for Lee Evans

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BigBucs
    Unpretentious
    • May 2009
    • 12758

    #16
    Originally posted by Aso21Raiders
    They were fine last year and Lee Evans didn't even see the ball that much. He was a deep threat here and there and that's it. Stop acting like this is a huge head scratcher.
    The hell are you babbling about? Its the fucking Bills. They play in the same division as the Pats and Jets. They need to keep talent not trade it away.




    Comment

    • Hasselbeck
      Jus' bout dat action boss
      • Feb 2009
      • 6175

      #17
      This trade pisses me off because I had Torrey Smith as a sleeper.

      Thanks for nothing Ozzie Newsome
      Originally posted by ram29jackson
      I already said months ago that Seattle wasn't winning any SB

      Comment

      • Aso
        The Serious House
        • Nov 2008
        • 11137

        #18
        Originally posted by BigBucs
        The hell are you babbling about? Its the fucking Bills. They play in the same division as the Pats and Jets. They need to keep talent not trade it away.
        Except he won't be missed. Why should they be keeping players who's production are easily replaceable? You act like Lee Evans is some great receiver. The Bills have a lot of depth out wide. Who do you think the Bills were throwing the ball to late last year out of all those spread formations?

        Why would they be paying over 3 mil + any bonuses to Lee Evans for what they were getting out of him and for what they had behind to replace him. Trading him away makes sense.

        Comment

        Working...