I don't think you understand...
its pointless because its the same both ways by your logic, even if I don't agree...
Indianapolis receivers left at older ages as you say, despite Pathon leaving after I want to say 3 or 4 years, I don't remember, anyway, he left, and Pollard left at an old age, and they dropped off because they were older in your opinion.
maybe that doesn't apply with Pathon, but it does with Pollard, Stokely had his one great season, and ever since his seasons have been average, just like his last season where he actually played with indianapolis, he was hurt the year after.
the example with brady is Deion Branch, who left and is virutally doing the same thing he was with NE.
I mean, by your logic it makes them both seemingly the same in that argument.
thats why its pointless... not because "I can't debate with you"
its pointless because its the same both ways by your logic, even if I don't agree...
Indianapolis receivers left at older ages as you say, despite Pathon leaving after I want to say 3 or 4 years, I don't remember, anyway, he left, and Pollard left at an old age, and they dropped off because they were older in your opinion.
maybe that doesn't apply with Pathon, but it does with Pollard, Stokely had his one great season, and ever since his seasons have been average, just like his last season where he actually played with indianapolis, he was hurt the year after.
the example with brady is Deion Branch, who left and is virutally doing the same thing he was with NE.
I mean, by your logic it makes them both seemingly the same in that argument.
thats why its pointless... not because "I can't debate with you"
Comment