Aaron Rodgers wasnt on anybody's radar as a "once in a decade" prospect, he just happened to become that later on.
Oh joy, a QB rankings list!
Collapse
X
-
Comment
-
Brady & Rodgers werent elite level prospects, Manning was. Luck is expected to be on that level. No draft pick has been expected to be at that level since Manning. Manning was drafted over a decade ago. Its not hard to figure out. Keyword here is prospect.Comment
-
Going back to what you originally said ...
Andrew Luck is a once in a decade prospect. Luck is very likely to be on the same level as Peyton Manning, and except for Aaron Rodgers, none of those players you mentioned are on the same level.Comment
-
What part of "prospect" do you not understand? Rodgers was not a prospect at the same level of Manning & Luck.Comment
-
You muh fuckers are DYING for Luck to be great right away, without any questions, but its unfair to even put those expectations on the kid, he shouldnt be treated any differently then any other top QB prospect we've ever seen. I really dont think hes going to be as good as people are hoping.Comment
-
Its not all bullshit. Luck is a much better prospect than Ryan Leaf ever was. It doesnt guarantee anything, if thats your point. But the fact remains Luck is far & away the best QB prospect since Peyton Manning, which was more than a decade ago.Comment
-
You muh fuckers are DYING for Luck to be great right away, without any questions, but its unfair to even put those expectations on the kid, he shouldnt be treated any differently then any other top QB prospect we've ever seen. I really dont think hes going to be as good as people are hoping.Comment
-
But Leaf was obviously considered by many to be a higher rated prospect then Peyton.. and if Luck is a much better prospect then Leaf.. but Luck is the best prospect since Peyton.. you following? Sounds like a big circle to me. You can label the kid whatever you want, ive heard the same label for other QBs in the past.. but at that position there is never any guarantees, and thats the only fact that we know as it relates to Luck.Comment
-
But Leaf was obviously considered by many to be a higher rated prospect then Peyton.. and if Luck is a much better prospect then Leaf.. but Luck is the best prospect since Peyton.. you following? Sounds like a big circle to me. You can label the kid whatever you want, ive heard the same label for other QBs in the past.. but at that position there is never any guarantees, and thats the only fact that we know as it relates to Luck.Comment
-
Phil Simms would disagree...
I've maybe seen this kid play a half of football, but the one thing I do know about him is he's got his head on straight. For years the next great prospect had multi million dollar physical skills and a ten cent head.
If the experts are even close with what this kid brings to the game physically I think we'll see something special. He'll also be a 2nd generation NFL player, so it's not like he'll be overwhelmed by a professional environment..Comment
Comment