Mark Sanchez sucks

[Tailback U]

Which QB would you rather have?

Quarterback A:

198/361 (54.8%), 2306 yards, 10 TD, 7 INT, 20 sacks, 5 fumbles lost, 75.6 QBR.

Quarterback B:

169/298 (56.7%), 2081 yards, 14 TD, 9 INT, 22 sacks, 5 fumbles lost, 81.5 QBR.

 

Quarterback A: Joe Flacco

Quarterback B: Mark Sanchez

[Senser81]

Oh goody, another thread on Sanchez. FFS, I don't think anyone here has said he's fucking elite level. He's middle of the pack, around 14-17th best QB in the league, and he does what we ask him to do. He's played well this year, yet I'm assuming that your like 90% of the retards on VSN who figure they can make judgement calls based one game.

They were ripping on Sanchez on Mike & Mike this morning (because of Greenberg's fandom of the Jets, he is ALWAYS a topic of discussion), and then they wanted to show how bad he's doing this year compared to past years...and when they read the numbers, Sanchez is actually doing quite a bit better this year than in his other years. Which is kind of my point in all of this...Sanchez was never really all that good to begin with, and he's not doing any worse this year than he's done in the past.

[Houston]

Freeman lights it up

If you're talking about the INT column then yeah, 2nd in the league in that category.

[ZoneBlitz]

Which QB would you rather have?

Quarterback A:

198/361 (54.8%), 2306 yards, 10 TD, 7 INT, 20 sacks, 5 fumbles lost, 75.6 QBR.

Quarterback B:

169/298 (56.7%), 2081 yards, 14 TD, 9 INT, 22 sacks, 5 fumbles lost, 81.5 QBR.

 

Quarterback A: Joe Flacco

Quarterback B: Mark Sanchez

So because Joe Flacco is having a down year, that suddenly makes Sanchez a good QB?

[Tailback U]

Flacco isn't having a down year, he is having a typical Flacco year.

Just threw that in there because Sanchez gets a lot of heat and Flacco never seems to get any even though he is just as average as Sanchez. Neither are that good, both are average. And I don't think anybody really thinks Sanchez or Flacco is a top 10 QB.

[ZoneBlitz]

Flacco isn't having a down year, he is having a typical Flacco year.

Just threw that in there because Sanchez gets a lot of heat and Flacco never seems to get any even though he is just as average as Sanchez.

I would lean toward Joe having a down year, but even if Flacco does suck, it doesnt make Sanchez suck any less, just makes Flacco over-hyped.

[RosettaStoned]

Flacco is playing better than I've ever seen him play this year.

Signed,

Steelers fan

[jms493]

He is in NY he got hyped...did anyone think this guy would be awesome? No....he is an average NFL who needs alot of help around him to be successful. He will never be the team MVP.

NY is so weird.....most people still hate Eli and say he is not good and everyone still has hope that Sanchize will be the Jets savior.

[Senser81]

Flacco in 2010 = 3622 yards, 25 TDs, 10 INTs, 93.6 rating.

Sanchez in 2010 = 3291 yards, 17 TDs, 13 INTs, 75.3 rating.

[jms493]

Flacco in 2010 = 3622 yards, 25 TDs, 10 INTs, 93.6 rating.

Sanchez in 2010 = 3291 yards, 17 TDs, 13 INTs, 75.3 rating.

Naturally I would take Flacco in a heartbeat but damn he has looked so bad at times this year.

[Tailback U]

Flacco is slightly better than Sanchez, which means he is slightly above average.

Sanchez is painfully average.

Either way, they both play in similar systems and they've both had some success due to the systems. Neither are that good and both would be terrible on most on other teams.

[RosettaStoned]

Naturally I would take Flacco in a heartbeat but damn he has looked so bad at times this year.

His receivers can't catch. If his guys caught the ball he would be having a career year.

[Senser81]

Naturally I would take Flacco in a heartbeat but damn he has looked so bad at times this year.

Yeah, he's looked terrible this year, especially against teams that aren't any good. Here is what I think...Flacco had success in 2010, and the Ravens looked to expand Flacco's role in the offense a little more. But, the Ravens lost Heap (Flacco's go-to guy when healthy), they got rid of Derrick Mason, signed a completely ineffective Lee Evans, and now start stonehands Torrey Smith at WR. The Ravens took a big step backwards in terms of receiving corps, yet they still want Flacco to play a prominent role.

[Senser81]

Flacco is slightly better than Sanchez, which means he is slightly above average.

Sanchez is painfully average.

Either way, they both play in similar systems and they've both had some success due to the systems. Neither are that good and both would be terrible on most on other teams.

Completely disagree. Flacco is much better than Sanchez.

[jms493]

Yeah, he's looked terrible this year, especially against teams that aren't any good. Here is what I think...Flacco had success in 2010, and the Ravens looked to expand Flacco's role in the offense a little more. But, the Ravens lost Heap (Flacco's go-to guy when healthy), they got rid of Derrick Mason, signed a completely ineffective Lee Evans, and now start stonehands Torrey Smith at WR. The Ravens took a big step backwards in terms of receiving corps, yet they still want Flacco to play a prominent role.

True a reliable TE is key and the new fad in the NFL. Seems like almost every good team has a WR/TE type players. (Graham, Gonzalez, Hernandez, Gronk, Finely and so on) Ed Dickson is not that bad...not sure of his blocking capabilities.

IF Eli didn't have Jake Ballard bailing his ass out this year they Giants would be under .500