Which sequel will tonight's game more closely resemble?

[FirstTimer]

Still waiting for you to tell me why BCS rematches are bad, even if its the 2 best teams.

:whut:

Are you not understanding about this.


Dictated rematches = bad. I don't recall a dicated rematch in the BCS that ever consisting of "clearly" the two best teams. It's impossible to evaluate the hypothetical because we have no idea who or how the 3rd place team is or how they got to where they are....and on down the line.

Your question, sucks, is irrelevant, and on and on and on.

NFL playoff rematches=fine.

Dictated BCS CG rematches=bad

[ZoneBlitz]

:whut:

Are you not understanding about this.


Dictated rematches = bad. I don't recall a dicated rematch in the BCS that ever consisting of "clearly" the two best teams. It's impossible to evaluate the hypothetical because we have no idea who or how the 3rd place team is or how they got to where they are....and on down the line.

Your question, sucks, is irrelevant, and on and on and on.

NFL playoff rematches=fine.

Dictated BCS CG rematches=bad

Then how can you say BCS rematches are bad if you know nothing about these "hypothetical" situations?

[FirstTimer]

Then how can you say BCS rematches are bad if you know nothing about these "hypothetical" situations?

:whut:

Because of the one we have seen it was shitty because there were other clearly qualified team(s). At least we are dealing from the context of reality where as you are dealing from some odd hypothetical that we have no details on.

I mean for God sakes the BCS bowl committees actually try to avoid rematches in their other bowls. Yet in the NCG they didn't this season.

Again:

BCS Rematch= bad

Playoff rematch= fine.

[ZoneBlitz]

Again:

BCS Rematch= bad

Patient bear is still waiting for you to explain why thats the case.

Tell me why rematches are bad...not why the last rematch was bad...we are talking in general, not about one specific case.

Srs if you're not gonna answer just tell me, i dont wanna keep going around in circles with you.

[FirstTimer]

Patient bear is still waiting for you to explain why thats the case.

Patient bear is retarded bear because it's been explained about 1,000 times to you.

Tell me why rematches are bad

:obama:


Retarded bear strikes again.

[ZoneBlitz]

Patient bear is retarded bear because it's been explained about 1,000 times to you.

Uh no it hasnt.

You say BCS rematches = bad...but when asked why, you keep using the last BCS as an example. When i give you a different scenario, its too mind-blowing for you to answer. When i ask you why they are bad in general, you go back to using the last BCS as an example...its a circle that never ends.

Im gonna try one last time:

Why are BCS rematches bad IN GENERAL? (not talking about this year).

[FirstTimer]

Uh no it hasnt.

yes it has. Please read the other threads on the subject.

Ironically you bumped the one with no explanations.

You say BCS rematches = bad

Yep. All evidence points to them being so.

, you keep using the last BCS as an example.

Yeah, imagine that. Using things that ACTUALLY happened to support a point.

Odd.

its too mind-blowing for you to answer.

No. It's not.

It's impossible to evaluate in any meaningful way given the numerous factors involved. You trying to invent some scenario doesn't mean anything because it's 1. invetned and not real, 2. short sighted, and 3. ignores the obious context of this entire thread, entire discussion, and entire idea that people were angry about an LSU vs Bama rematch vs being more accepting of a possible rematch between Bal and SF.

You repeatedly trying to change the context of the discussion because you have no leg to stand on is pathetic.

Why are BCS rematches bad IN GENERAL? (not talking about this year).

This has been explained.

Ad nauseum.

Rematches as a result of playoffs=fine.

Dictated rematches in the BCS=bad.

Please go back and read the other threads on the topic.


You have easily become perhaps the worst poster on this site. You make me miss theInfluence.
Thnx.

[ZoneBlitz]

This has been explained.

Ad nauseum.

LMAO your troll tactics are so fucking predictable.

When you're backed into a corner all you do is say "ive already answered" and "go read the thread".

No you havent answered.

If you did answer, you could just answer it again...but you havent.

And Nahste said that people are against NFL rematches...you thanked his posts even though you have no problem with NFL rematches...you're gonna have to make up your mind where you stand.

Basically your argument sucks and has holes poked all over it.

Keep trying to troll your way out of this though, its very amusing.

[FirstTimer]

When you're backed into a corner all you do is say "ive already answered" and "go read the thread".

I'm lazy. I don't feel like retyping it yet again.

Sue me.

[FirstTimer]

Also, you will want to re-read NAHSTE's post.

You're wrong.

[ralaw]

[FirstTimer]

This has run it's course. NAHSTE, your will be done.