Can someone explain this to me...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • FirstTimer
    Freeman Error

    • Feb 2009
    • 18729

    #46
    Originally posted by mooseontheloose
    hahahaha, wow, are you a fucking retard?

    Pro Tip: Read up on economics and how it impacts business decisions.
    So the US is punished for Canada having a shitty economy? Maybe the Canadians should invest in more lucrative sports?



    Originally posted by mooseontheloose
    You have to be the most ignorant person here if you're honestly going to argue that hockey isn't most popular in Canada.
    I never argued that......ever.


    Originally posted by Ravin
    And that is why each of those 6 teams is basically tops in the league in terms of profit.
    Isn't NHL and profit kind of an oxy moron?


    Originally posted by Ravin
    You clearly know nothing about hockey or Canada, so kindly go die in a fire and leave this thread
    Don't you mean "Leaf"?
    Originally posted by Ravin
    Yet the entire league is filled of Canadian's, and each team has an average of 2/3rds filled of Canadian players. And since people like stats
    Just another example of the US raping Canada of it's resources....



    Originally posted by Ravin
    Canada - 6 NHL teams
    USA - 24 NHL teams
    US only has 4 times more teams then Canada

    So yeah, ten times bigger population, but only 5 times more teams? GTFout of here.
    Canadian math.............

    Comment

    • Tailback U
      No substitute 4 strength.
      • Nov 2008
      • 10282

      #47
      Fighting is necessary in hockey because it prevents 3rd and 4th liners from harassing 1st liners. That's the bottom line.

      It's not about keeping star players safe or how dangerous the game is. Every hockey player knows that if you start getting a little chippy with a guy like Joe Thornton you are going to have to answer to a guy like Jody Shelley.

      Fighting keeps the role players from fucking with the star players - mentally and physically. Fighting does not so much keep role players from going after a star player with the intentions of hurting them, but rather keeps the pests from getting too obnoxiously close to the star players and on their nerves.

      and hockey is not more physical than football because, among other things, football contains the aspect of passing. the aspect of passing the football in the air over the course of 50 yards makes the hits all that much more violent. hockey players are not threatened by as many blind side hits or guys leaving their feet at full on sprints in order to launch their bodies into another human being as hard as they possibly can.

      that's why NFL teams play 16 games a season and NHL teams play 82.

      that's why NFL teams play 1 game a week and NHL teams play 3 or 4.

      hockey is very physical and demanding, but it is not nearly as hard on the body or as violent as football.
      Last edited by Tailback U; 10-29-2009, 10:20 PM.

      Comment

      • mfbmike
        Goat****er
        • Nov 2008
        • 4793

        #48
        Firsttimer, stop trolling.

        Comment

        • killgod
          OHHHH WHEN THE REDSSSSS
          • Oct 2008
          • 4714

          #49
          what most non hockey fans don't seem to realize is that these "goon" players were probably quality scorers at the junior level...sometimes it just doesn't pan out but if you can fill another role to get yourself a job...why not.

          Comment

          • Tailback U
            No substitute 4 strength.
            • Nov 2008
            • 10282

            #50
            Originally posted by killgod
            what most non hockey fans don't seem to realize is that these "goon" players were probably quality scorers at the junior level...sometimes it just doesn't pan out but if you can fill another role to get yourself a job...why not.
            it's just illogical to think that you can have goal scorers on every line. non-hockey fans don't understand the importance of having checkers, grinders, and enforcers/pests on every team.

            Comment

            • Tailback U
              No substitute 4 strength.
              • Nov 2008
              • 10282

              #51
              Originally posted by Heelsox
              exactly. I personally think chemistry is more important in hockey than any other sport. You can't put 3 guys that want to be 50 goal scorers on the same line and even sniff success.
              Agreed, a prime example of that is the New Jersey Devils in the 90s. Guys like Scott Stevens and Claude Lemieux were essential to those Stanley Cup teams but they weren't goal scorers.

              Comment

              Working...