Does having Joe Rogan as the color analyst hurt MMA's credibility?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Liquidrob
    Izzy is a bum
    • Feb 2009
    • 11785

    #31
    This is not an anti-rogan thread, or Joe should be replaced, I have already said that Rogan does a good job

    Rogan basically calls out moves, he knows names which the majority of people train know, but Joe is a fan first, he picks sides and loves bjj, he makes it exciting because he thinks like a fan, but you dont need a fan being the main analyst IMO

    Now think about when Tito and Chuck fight....again, would you rather here Rogan calling them 'world class' all fight and talk about there 'bad blood' or here from Randy who doesnt care who wins and has fought them both

    I'm just saying go with a 3 man booth all the time, Goldberg is awful and can shill and sell shit all broadcast long, Rogan is the super fan who knows bjj and than an actually fighter who knows what it is like to fight from experience, not from watching a bunch of fights
    Liquidrob's Top 10 Fighters Rankings


    The 10 Fighters Who Changed The Game

    Comment

    • KINGOFOOTBALL
      Junior Member
      • Feb 2009
      • 10343

      #32
      Originally posted by EmpireWF
      The top guys mentioned are play by play guys. We're talking color men.
      As I said before. There was play by play and analysts. The distinction is isnt there anymore the way it used to be.

      3 man booths and throwing in not related to the sport guys has become common place. None of those guys I listed are pure play by play guys anymore and haven't been for decades.
      Best reason to have a license.

      Comment

      Working...