UFC PPV numbers don't make sense

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Liquidrob
    Izzy is a bum
    • Feb 2009
    • 11785

    #16
    Those numbers do not come out, they are 'estimates', the UFC is a private company, PPV numbers are not verifiable, live gate is, attendence is

    These PPV numbers are estimates of what Dana White tells people to say

    Dana White and Zuffa have manipulated every part of the MMA world, if you don’t believe that you are crazy

    The MMA media is on egg shells, they will pull your credentials in a second, Dana equals access, that’s what the media wants, so if you blast the UFC or White, you are out

    Sponsors have been bullied, you deal with Fedor like RVCA and Tapout you will not be able to sponsor fighters in the UFC

    Fighters have been threatened, you sign with EA you will never be in the UFC, you don’t sign away your likeness rights, you and your team will be kicked out of the UFC

    So you think these numbers have not been inflated? Lol, so every part of the Zuffa/UFC world gets manipulated but for some reason a unverifiable number like PPV’s buys isn’t a part of it, yeah, ok
    Liquidrob's Top 10 Fighters Rankings


    The 10 Fighters Who Changed The Game

    Comment

    • Warner2BruceTD
      2011 Poster Of The Year
      • Mar 2009
      • 26142

      #17
      You sound like a 9/11 thruther.

      You're right rob, Dana White has every member of the media, every cable/sat company, and every television trade journal/media person under his thumb, collectively manipulating ppv numbers to his liking. And with all the enemies he has made over the years, nobody has blown a whistle or challenged this diabolical scheme. You've figured it out.

      Worst thread ever.

      Comment

      • EmpireWF
        Giants in the Super Bowl
        • Mar 2009
        • 24082

        #18
        Originally posted by Liquidrob
        Those numbers do not come out, they are 'estimates', the UFC is a private company, PPV numbers are not verifiable, live gate is, attendence is

        These PPV numbers are estimates of what Dana White tells people to say

        So you think these numbers have not been inflated? Lol, so every part of the Zuffa/UFC world gets manipulated but for some reason a unverifiable number like PPV’s buys isn’t a part of it, yeah, ok
        Guess we jut disagree then.

        Obviously UFC's PPV #s are not exact because there is no official release of them.

        However, it's not as if Dana White tells EVERYONE..."hey guys, 100 did 2 million buys" and all the reports follow his word as gospel.

        For example:

        Meltzer's WON from December 2009:
        After four straight disappointing numbers, UFC 107 shocked pretty much everyone, affirming the value of a great pre-game show as it did, based on the latest estimates, more than 620,000 buys. That will end up probably tripling Survivor Series’ North American buys that took place the next day.
        And also...this one is from January 2009
        There were a lot of people shocked when Dana White this past week told ESPN: The Magazine that UFC 92 (Forrest Griffin vs. Rashad Evans for light heavyweight title; Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira vs. Frank Mir for interim heavyweight title; Wanderlei Silva vs. Quinton Jackson) 12/27 beat UFC 91 (Brock Lesnar vs. Frank Mir) by 150,000 to 175,000 buys. Using his own numbers, although he declined in that interview to give a number, that would indicate 1.16 million to 1.185 million buys for a show that even internally before the show, those inside the company were talking about numbers barely more than half of that.

        When it comes to PPV numbers, there are surprises to a degree, but never anything like this. While everyone expected UFC to do big numbers on 11/15, 12/27 and again on 1/31, the 12/27 show had figured to be the weakest of the three. When you talk all of the biggest buy numbers in the history of any genre, while predicting the actual numbers wasn’t always the easiest, every record setting show was known in advance it would likely set the record. In 2006, it was obvious Chuck Liddell vs. Randy Couture would set a record beforehand, as it was with Royce Gracie vs. Matt Hughes, Tito Ortiz vs. Ken Shamrock and Ortiz vs. Liddell. While in most cases, the actual numbers exceeded pre-show expectations, they were expected to set a new mark each time. The exception was Ortiz vs. Liddell, where the 1 million buy figure and even larger figures were thrown around beforehand. Since that show, nobody had expected any show to approach the Ortiz-Liddell level except the Couture vs. Brock Lesnar match, which appears to have finished in the same ballpark, but maybe very slightly underneath. There were expectations that the 1/31 show with Georges St. Pierre vs. B.J. Penn would do 600,000 to 800,000 buys even before the Lesnar numbers came in, but after the last two numbers have come in, White has already publicly claimed it would break the new record.

        Immediately, when White said the number, it was met with mass skepticism, particularly within the boxing community which has always claimed UFC isn’t doing what is claimed. While they don’t always correlate, the fact UFC had to give away more than 4,000 tickets to fill the MGM Grand Garden Arena for the live event is hardly an indication of a show that supposedly did more buys than any Wrestlemania (based on North America) or the biggest UFC fights, and all but three non-heavyweight boxing matches in history.

        Within the company, which never publicly releases numbers, we were told they were estimating 1.1 million to 1.2 million as the total buys, which would be only slightly below what Oscar De La Hoya vs. Manny Pacquiao did, and would have been the biggest non-boxing PPV event ever in North America, as no Wrestlemania has ever done 1 million buys in North America. It’s almost impossible to believe, given no pre-show factors indicated anything like that and how big De La Hoya vs. Pacquiao was mainstream compared to the media hype this event received.. There was no great momentum, in the sense of UFC ratings were slightly down when it came to the two specials on Spike in the weeks before the show, although using TV ratings to predict how PPV’s or overall business is doing when it comes to wrestling, MMA or boxing rarely yields much of a correlation. It’s also a number that almost nobody outside the UFC office seems to be anything but skeptical of.

        The one thing that every cable source as well as trending patterns to indicate is the show was a huge success and blew away pre-show expectations. And even if it did very slightly less than UFC 91, which was the worst numbers that were out independently, that’s still a gigantic success. The show was either No. 1 or No. 2 for the year, and at worst, No. 3 of all-time.

        Cable sources indicate the show did about the same numbers as UFC 91, perhaps very slightly lower. That show has been estimated at 1.01 million buys.

        The indications are the show did not to anything close to record numbers in Canada, looking at being only fifth for 2008 in that country behind the shows headlined by Georges St. Pierre and Lesnar.

        In comparing trending patterns, which usually are almost dead-on when it comes to predicting PPV numbers (except when Brock Lesnar fights for some reason), one set indicates, like the cable sources, almost identical numbers to UFC 91, and another indicates the numbers UFC claimed, numbers beating UFC 91 by a solid 10% or more and being the biggest UFC show of all-time. So the show almost surely did great, and there is at least some evidence this could be true.

        It seems to be a lock that UFC in 2008 has set the all-time single year PPV record for any company. If the figures listed by White are accurate, the final North American PPV gross would be in the $290 million range for the year, breaking the WWE worldwide record mark of $260 million set in 2001 and the domestic mark of $255 million set last year by HBO Boxing. Even if we are conservative and say the show did slightly less than UFC 91, you are still talking in the $270 million range for the year. Keep in mind the company itself will see less than half that figure.

        Based on trending patterns, the Rashad Evans vs. Forrest Griffin match was the top draw, with Quinton Jackson vs. Wanderlei Silva second and Frank Mir vs. Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira, even with the 13 weeks of television building it up, a distant third. It’s pretty clear it was the combination of the three main events, as opposed to any singular match, that was the reason for the draw, as none of the matches (nor any match in UFC history) had close to the interest level based on trending numbers as Lesnar vs. Couture (which blew it out of the water as far as single match trending interest) or De La Hoya vs. Pacquiao.


        Comment

        • CrimsonGhost56
          True Blue
          • Feb 2009
          • 5981

          #19
          apparently franks retirement has hit rob a little harder then we thought...

          Comment

          • Liquidrob
            Izzy is a bum
            • Feb 2009
            • 11785

            #20
            Originally posted by Warner2BruceTD
            You sound like a 9/11 thruther.

            You're right rob, Dana White has every member of the media, every cable/sat company, and every television trade journal/media person under his thumb, collectively manipulating ppv numbers to his liking. And with all the enemies he has made over the years, nobody has blown a whistle or challenged this diabolical scheme. You've figured it out.

            Worst thread ever.
            The only guy who really reports PPV numbers is Meltzer, all the 'MMA Media' just link to him for there numbers, the MMA media if you want to even call them that is trash, a rumor or report goes on 1 website, than 100 other sites link to it and it becomes a story

            Why do you keep thinking the cable/sat companies release numbers? They don't, the UFC is a private company, they don't release numbers either

            The only real numbers are live gate, attendence and TV ratings (somewhat)

            You are so defensive of Meltzer
            Liquidrob's Top 10 Fighters Rankings


            The 10 Fighters Who Changed The Game

            Comment

            • Liquidrob
              Izzy is a bum
              • Feb 2009
              • 11785

              #21
              lol @ sources, trending patterns and estimates being official numbers

              so basically estimates of estimates from sources who from other sources who trend patterns of estimated numbers, sounds good to me
              Last edited by Liquidrob; 07-15-2010, 12:37 PM.
              Liquidrob's Top 10 Fighters Rankings


              The 10 Fighters Who Changed The Game

              Comment

              • Warner2BruceTD
                2011 Poster Of The Year
                • Mar 2009
                • 26142

                #22
                Meltzer refutes Dana's numbers all the time, but yeah, he's just another guy under the thumb like everyone else.

                Its also funny how Meltzer gets his estimates for WWE from the same sources he gathers his UFC estimates, and they are usually dead on to what the WWE eventually announces in their quarterly repors.

                Comment

                • Warner2BruceTD
                  2011 Poster Of The Year
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 26142

                  #23
                  Originally posted by Liquidrob
                  The only guy who really reports PPV numbers is Meltzer, all the 'MMA Media' just link to him for there numbers, the MMA media if you want to even call them that is trash, a rumor or report goes on 1 website, than 100 other sites link to it and it becomes a story

                  Why do you keep thinking the cable/sat companies release numbers? They don't, the UFC is a private company, they don't release numbers either

                  The only real numbers are live gate, attendence and TV ratings (somewhat)

                  You are so defensive of Meltzer
                  Cable/sat companies do release numbers, those are the SOURCES where the numbers come from. The reason the numbers are called estimates, is because you have to gather the info from 1,000 different companies and piece it together. That's why you never see "official" figures, because nobody takes the time months later to add it all up, they just estimate based on trends, etc for slow reporting companies and the like.

                  Its not just Meltzer, tv trade jurnals cover this stuff too, so do ppv trade journals, they all estimate the same way, and none of them give two shits about keeping Dana happy, even if you believe he controls everyone else (which is silly too).

                  Comment

                  • LiquidLarry2GhostWF
                    Highwayman
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 15429

                    #24
                    Originally posted by CrimsonGhost56
                    apparently franks retirement has hit rob a little harder then we thought...
                    His world is crumbling beneath his feet.

                    Comment

                    Working...